A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE COLONIAL DECLINE OF THE INDIAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY AND ITS REVIVAL UNDER THE SWADESHI MOVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i10.2025.6445Keywords:
Textile Industry, Swadeshi Movement, Deindustrialization, Colonial Policies, Economic Nationalism, Khadi, BoycottAbstract [English]
This paper presents a comparative analysis of the causes of the colonial decline of the Indian textile industry and its revival efforts under the Swadeshi Movement. The main argument of this study is that British discriminatory tariff policies and free trade pushed Indian weavers into a severe phase of deindustrialization, placing immense pressure on the rural economy. In contrast, the Swadeshi Movement, which began after 1905, offered ideological resistance to this decline, particularly through the political symbolism of the spinning wheel and khadi. Although Swadeshi efforts did not completely reverse the damage to the rural economy, they strengthened national identity and boosted the Indian mill industry. This research establishes that the textile industry, rather than being merely an economic commodity, became a political weapon of resistance for Indian nationalism, laying the foundation for a limited but significant economic revival in the face of colonial devastation.
Downloads
References
Bagchi, A. K. (1976). Deindustrialisation in India in the Nineteenth Century: Some Theoretical Implications (डीइंडस्ट्रियलाइज़ेशन इन इंडिया इन द नाइन्टीन्थ सेंचुरी: सम थ्योरेटिकल इम्प्लीकेशन्स). The Journal of Development Studies, 12(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220387608421565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220387608421565
Chandra, B. (1966). The Rise and Growth of Economic Nationalism in India: Economic Policies of Indian National Leadership, 1880–1905 (द राइज़ एंड ग्रोथ ऑफ़ इकोनॉमिक नेशनलिज्म इन इंडिया: इकोनॉमिक पॉलिसीज़ ऑफ़ इंडियन नेशनल लीडरशिप, 1880–1905). People's Publishing House, 126.
Dutt, R. C. (1904). The Decline of the Textile Industry and Tariff Policies: A Major Analysis (वस्त्र उद्योग के पतन और टैरिफ़ नीतियों पर प्रमुख विश्लेषण). The Economic History of India in the Victorian Age, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Company, 120.
Dutt, R. P. (1947). A Marxist View on De-industrialisation and British Exploitation (वि-औद्योगीकरण और ब्रिटिश शोषण पर मार्क्सवादी दृष्टिकोण). India Today, People's Publishing House, 110.
Indian Industrial Commission. (1918). Report of the Indian Industrial Commission, 1916–18 (रिपोर्ट ऑफ़ द इंडियन इंडस्ट्रियल कमीशन, 1916–18). Superintendent Government Printing.
Naoroji, D. (1901). Poverty and Un-British Rule in India. London (पोवर्टी एंड अन-ब्रिटिश रूल इन इंडिया. लंदन). Swan Sonnenschein and Company, 212.
Parel, A. J. (1997). Gandhi on the Political and Philosophical Symbolism of the Spinning Wheel and Khadi (चरखे और खादी के राजनीतिक और दार्शनिक प्रतीकवाद पर गांधी के विचार). In Hind Swaraj and Other Writings, Cambridge University Press, 60–68.
Sarkar, S. (1983). Strategies and Socio-political Impact of the Swadeshi Movement (स्वदेशी आंदोलन की रणनीतियाँ और सामाजिक-राजनीतिक प्रभाव). Modern India, 1885–1947, Macmillan India, 120.
Srivastava, S. P. (1979). The De-industrialisation of India in the 19th Century: A Reappraisal (द डी-इंडस्ट्रियलाइज़ेशन ऑफ़ इंडिया इन द 19th सेंचुरी: ए रिअप्रेज़ल). The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 16(1), 119–137.
Whitley Commission. (1931). Report of the Royal Commission on Indian Labour. London (रिपोर्ट ऑफ़ द रॉयल कमीशन ऑन इंडियन लेबर. लंदन). H.M. Stationery Office.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Bablu Kumar Jayswal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.















