GENERATIVE DESIGN FOR CONCEPTUAL INSTALLATIONS

Authors

  • Pooja Yadav Assistant Professor, School of Business Management, Noida international University 203201
  • Shikhar Gupta Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, Solan, 174103, India
  • Sahil Suri Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Dr. Yogesh Jadhav Associate Professor, uGDX School of Technogy, ATLAS SkillTech University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Dr. Srinivasan T R Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Presidency University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Dr. Nirmalrani V Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3.2025.6672

Keywords:

Generative Design, Computational Creativity, Algorithmic Aesthetics, Interactive Installations, Machine Intelligence

Abstract [English]

Generative design is a huge shift in the manner of thinking out conceptual works by integrating the computer processes with the artistic instincts. The essay examines the role of computer systems in assisting artists in producing shifting, flexible, and information-driven physical experiences that exceed the common boundaries of art. Generative design involves the use of factors, chance, and rule-based reasoning, to generate forms that look like they were not written by a person. It is grounded on computer creativity and algorithmic aesthetics. Through AI and machine learning technologies as well as software applications, such as Grasshopper, Processing, and Houdini, designers have the opportunity to perform repeated research and feedback processes to simulate how things grow, move, and interact in nature. The analysis investigates how generative strategies transform the work of the designer as an entity that makes to one that maintains things running. It also puts into the limelight the interaction between human knowledge and machine intelligence. Case studies of popular generative installations demonstrate the way in which such works form interesting interactive environments that evolve according to the interaction of people with them and the information regarding the surrounding environment. Besides considering how things appear, the issues that are raised in this study include psychological and ethical questions regarding authorship, unpredictable, and the sustainability of computer art over time. The given study demonstrates that generative design can transform the process of creating future conceptual art by addressing such issues as technological restrictions, control over chance and material concerns. Generative design is perceived as a form of creation and a form of thinking of how art, technology, human experience combine to form new modes of expressing ourselves and telling stories in space.

References

Bölek, B., Tutal, O., and Özbaşaran, H. (2023). A Systematic Review on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Architecture. DRArch, 4, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4i1085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4i1085

Chen, J., Wang, D., Shao, Z., Zhang, X., Ruan, M., Li, H., and Li, J. (2023). Using Artificial Intelligence to Generate Master-Quality Architectural Designs from text descriptions. Buildings, 13(9), Article 2285. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13092285

Ennemoser, B., and Mayrhofer-Hufnagl, I. (2023). Design Across Multi-Scale Datasets by Developing a Novel Approach to 3DGANs. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 21(3), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231168231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231168231

Fu, B., Gao, Y., and Wang, W. (2023). Dual Generative Adversarial Networks for Automated Component Layout Design of Steel Frame-Brace Structures. Automation in Construction, 146, Article 104661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104661

Fu, B., Wang, W., and Gao, Y. (2024). Physical Rule-Guided Generative Adversarial Network for Automated Structural Layout Design of Steel Frame-Brace Structures. Journal of Building Engineering, 86, Article 108943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108943

Li, C., Zhang, T., Du, X., Zhang, Y., and Xie, H. (2025). Generative AI Models for Different Steps in Architectural Design: A Literature Review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 14, 759–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.10.001

Limkar, S., Ashok, W. V., Singh, S., Singh, A., Wagh, S. K., and Ajani, S. N. (2023). A Mechanism to Ensure Identity-Based Anonymity and Authentication for IoT infrastructure using cryptography. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 26(5), 1597–1611. https://doi.org/10.47974/JDMSC-1827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47974/JDMSC-1827

Lystbæk, M. S. (2025). Machine Learning-Driven Processes in Architectural Building Design. Automation in Construction, 178, Article 106379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106379 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106379

Nalawade, P. V., Bhandare, S., Bhole, S., Bhongale, V., and Ghayal, M. (2025). Acadlinker: Design and Evaluation a Skill-Based Student Network with a Touch of AI. International Journal of Research in Advanced Engineering and Technology (IJRAET), 14(2), 57–61.

Qi, Y., Yuan, C., Li, P., and Kong, Q. (2023). Damage Analysis and Quantification of RC Beams Assisted by Damage-T Generative Adversarial Network. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 117, Article 105536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105536

Qian, W., Yang, F., Mei, H., and Li, H. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Designer for High-Rise Building Sketches with user Preferences. Engineering Structures, 275, Article 115171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115171

Song, Z., Zhang, C., and Lu, Y. (2024). The Methodology for Evaluating the Fire Resistance Performance of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns by Integrating Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks and Random Oversampling. Journal of Building Engineering, 97, Article 110824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110824

Sun, C., Zhou, Y., and Han, Y. (2022). Automatic Generation of Architecture Facade for Historical Urban Renovation using Generative Adversarial Network. Building and Environment, 212, Article 108781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108781

Veloso, P., and Krishnamurti, R. (2023). Spatial Synthesis for Architectural Design as an Interactive Simulation with Multiple Agents. Automation in Construction, 154, Article 104997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104997

Zhuang, X., Ju, Y., Yang, A., and Caldas, L. (2023). Synthesis and Generation for 3D Architecture Volume with Generative Modeling. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 21(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231168233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771231168233

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Yadav, P., Gupta, S., Suri, S., Jadhav, Y., Srinivasan T R, & Nirmalrani V. (2025). GENERATIVE DESIGN FOR CONCEPTUAL INSTALLATIONS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i3.2025.6672