JUDICIAL RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN INDIA: A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF LAWS, ENFORCEMENT AND REFORMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1.2026.8401Keywords:
Domestic Violence, Judiciary, Judicial Response, Pwdva 2005, Section 498a, Gender Justice, IndiaAbstract [English]
Domestic violence persists as a significant obstacle to gender justice, constitutional morality and human rights in India, although the presence of numerous legislative protections and institutional safeguards. It impacts women from diverse social, economic, educational and cultural backgrounds, resulting in extensive physical, psychological, emotional and economic repercussions. Historically regarded as a private familial issue, domestic violence has increasingly been acknowledged through court intervention and legal reforms as a breach of fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India. In this setting, the judiciary is essential for interpreting domestic abuse legislation, protecting victims' rights, guaranteeing perpetrator accountability and reconciling social realities with constitutional principles of equality, dignity and justice. This article rigorously analyzes the legal reaction to domestic abuse in India, emphasizing the interpretation, enforcement and execution of legislation such as the Protection of Women from Domestic abuse Act, 2005 and Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. The study examines the changing role of Indian courts in broadening victim protection via constitutional interpretation and significant judicial rulings. It further evaluates procedural challenges, judicial delays, reconciliation-oriented approaches and concerns regarding accessibility of justice for women, especially those belonging to rural, economically weaker and marginalized communities. The paper addresses controversies around the purported abuse of domestic violence legislation and analyzes the impact of these issues on judicial perspectives and enforcement methodologies. The study underscores institutional deficiencies, including the absence of gender-sensitive methodologies, insufficient victim support systems and protracted case resolutions that undermine the efficacy of court remedies. The article ultimately recommends reforms to enhance judicial sensitivity, improve institutional coordination, expedite justice, expand legal aid and rehabilitation services and foster a victim-centered, rights-based legal framework for addressing domestic violence in India.
References
Chattopadhyay, S. (2017). Gendering Legal Discourse: A Critical Feminist Analysis of Domestic Violence Adjudication in India. The Journal of Law, Social Justice and Global Development, 20(b). https://doi.org/10.31273/LGD.2017.2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31273/LGD.2017.2017
Ganguli, P. (2024). Legal Responses to Domestic Violence: Efficacy and Challenges. LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, 2, 279. https://doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.17
Ghosh, B. (2013). How does the Legal Framework Protect Victims of Dowry and Domestic Violence in India? A Critical Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.04.002
Ghosh, B., and Choudhuri, T. (2011). Legal Protection Against Domestic Violence in India: Scope and Limitations. Journal of Family Violence, 26(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9369-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9369-1
Hu, S., and Conrad, C. R. (2020). Monitoring Via the Courts: Judicial Oversight and Police Violence in India. International Studies Quarterly, 64(3), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa039
Kumar, A. (2024). Examining the Role of the Judicial System in Upholding Women’s Human Rights: A Critical Analysis of the Trial Process. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4840646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4840646
Kumar, G. (2025). Gendered Power in Law Enforcement and the Justice System in India. Indian Journal of Social Research, 66.
Motiani, J., and Vora, K. (2025). Sexual Offences Against Women in India: A Critical Analysis of Legal Frameworks, Judicial Trends, and Societal Impact. VIDYA: A Journal of Gujarat University, 4(2), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.47413/tvcwxq11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47413/tvcwxq11
Neha, M., and Sangwan, V. (2026). Judicial Response and Administrative Challenges Under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005: A Study of Panipat District. International Journal of Advanced Research and Multidisciplinary Trends, 3(1), 85–96.
Peterson, V. (2016). Speeding up Sexual Assault Trials: A Constructive Critique of India’s Fast-Track Courts. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 18, 59.
Rodrigues, D. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Domestic Violence Legislation in India and the United States: Understanding Protection of Women Against Violence Act 2005 and Violence Against Women Act 1994.
Sharma, A., and Maharshi, D. A. (2025). Evolving Dimensions of Criminal Justice and Legal Reforms: A Critical Analysis of the Indian Legal Framework. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S8), 1745–1755.
Shrivastava, A., and Jabeen, F. (2025). Domestic Violence Against Women: A Socio Legal Perspective. LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, 3, 2380. https://doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.227
Singh, S. (2021). The Indian Judiciary, Domestic Violence and the Delusion of Rampant Misuse. NLUJ Law Review, 8, 185.
Uma, S. (2019). South Asian Feminist Engagements with Law: Some Explorations in the Context of Violence Against Women. Jindal Global Law Review, 10(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-019-00097-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-019-00097-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ms. Raheen Mirza, Dr. Manisha Matolia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.






















