THE URBAN HETEROTOPIA CONSTRUCT IN SELECTED BRITISH TRAVEL WRITING ABOUT CHINA IN EARLY 20TH CENTURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1.2026.8333Keywords:
Heterotopia, British Travel Writing, Colonial Space, Beijing, ShanghaiAbstract [English]
This paper investigates how early twentieth-century British travel writing constructs Chinese urban space as heterotopia, focusing on representations of Beijing and Shanghai in selected texts by Juliet Bredon and Christopher New. While existing scholarship has examined Orientalist discourse and narrative strategies in Western travel writing, it has rarely treated urban space as a structured, meaning-producing field. This study addresses that gap by operationalizing Michel Foucault’s concept of heterotopia through two key functions—spatial isolation and spatial juxtaposition—to analyze how these cities are not simply described but actively produced as ideological spaces. Drawing on post-Foucauldian spatial theory and postcolonial criticism, the paper demonstrates that Beijing is constructed as a heterotopia of ritualized isolation, while Shanghai emerges as a heterotopia of colonial juxtaposition. The study argues that spatial heterotopia functions as a narrative technology through which British travel writing organizes imperial vision, cultural difference, and political hierarchy.
References
Bacon, E. N. (1976). Design of Cities. Penguin Books.
Bredon, J. (1922). Peking: A Historical and Intimate Description of Its Chief Places of Interest. Shanghai: Kelly & Walsh, limited.
Chen, S. G., & Jin, Y. Y. (2025). Wartime “Border Towns” and the Literary Construction of Ecological “Heterotopia”: On the Imagination of Kunming in Wang Zengqi’s 1940s Novels. Southern Cultural Forum, (03), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.14065/j.cnki.nfwt.2025.03.020
Clifford, N. J. (2001). "A Truthful Impression of the Country": British and American Travel Writing in China, 1880-1949. University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17395
Dehaene, M. & De Cauter, L. (2008). Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Postcivil Society. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203089415
Du, W. W. (2020). The Construction of Urban Space in Modern and Contemporary Chinese Epidemic Writing. Jinan Journal (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 42(08), 122–132.
Du, W. W. (2023). Albanian Complex, Heterotopia, and Spatialization of Time—The Spatial Construction Path of a World Vision in Chen He’s Novels. Literary Contention, (04), 170–176.
Foucault, M. (1986). Of Other Spaces. diacritics, 16(1), 22-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/464648
Genocchio, B. (1995). Discourse, Discontinuity, Difference: the Question of ‘Other’ Spaces. Postmodern Cities and Spaces, 35-46.
He, C. (2013). “Picturesque” Gaze: The Image of America in the Eyes of 19th-Century British Travelers. Foreign Literature Studies, 35(03), 158–164. doi:10.19915/j.cnki.fls.2013.03.020
Huang, L. J. (2021). Writing about Mobile Space: The Genealogy of Travel Literature Criticism and Its Interdisciplinary Interpretation. Foreign Literature, (02), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.16430/j.cnki.fl.2021.02.015
Huang, M. (2021). Urban Heterotopia Space and the “Other” Consciousness in Pinter’s Plays [Master’s Thesis, Guangxi Normal University]. https://link.cbki.net/doi/10.27036/d.cnki.ggxsu.2021.001141
Jesus, D. D., & Catchuela, L. C. (2026). Status Of Selected Local Universities and Colleges In Metro Manila: Basis For Proposed Intervention Measures. ShodhGyan-NU: Journal of Literature and Culture Studies, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhgyan.v4.i1.2026.80 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhgyan.v4.i1.2026.80
Jiang, K. J. (2022). Urban Space Writing in the Song Dynasty from the Perspective of Heterotopia. Popular Literature and Art, (22), 13–15.
Johnson, P. (2006). Unravelling Foucault’s ‘different spaces’. History of the human sciences, 19(4), 75-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106069669
Lethbridge, H. J. (1983). All about Shanghai. Oxford University Press.
Liu, H. (2022). On the Urban Heterotopia in New-Century Migrant Worker Novels. Urban Culture Studies, (01), 112–126.
Luo, H. (2024). Travel Writing in African American literature: Rethinking Ethnicity and Reconstructing the Spiritual Homeland. Academic Exploration, (07), 75–83.
New, C. (1985). Shanghai. epubli GmbH, Berlin. www.epubli.de.
Strand, D. (1989). Rickshaw Beijing: City people and Politics in the 1920s. Univ of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520913875
Sur, S. (2022). Visualising Heterotopias in Urban Spaces in Select South Asian English Fiction. Asiatic: IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature, 16(2), 134-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31436/asiatic.v16i2.2653
Tian, J. W. (2021). Beijing in Eighteenth-Century British Travel Literature: The Reversal from Utopia to Anti-Utopia. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies,32(05),64-75.
Tian, J., & Chen, Y. (2018). Oriental Utopia—The Image of Beijing in European Medieval Travel Literature. Foreign Language and Literature, 34(01), 45–51.
Xiang, J. S. (2021). Heterotopia and Heterogeneous Images: the Other Space in Shanghai Dreams. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), (02), 144–151.
Zeng, J. K. (2023). Heterotopia and City Space in Sister Carrie. [Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University]. https://link.cnki.net/doi/10.27786/d.cnki.gzjlg.2023.001699
Zhang, C. (2022). The Construction of the Other in Naipaul’s Colonial Social Space. Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy & Social Science Edition), 43(04), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.19563/j.cnki.sdzs.2022.04.017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ding Meijie, Yvonne Michelle Campbell

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.






















