COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL NATURE OF BLOCKCHAIN AND SMART CONTRACTS: FROM PURE TECHNOLOGY TO LEGAL PERSONALITY

Authors

  • Patryk Chmielarz University of the National Education Commission, Krakow, Poland WOS: MGU-9121-2025

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i11s.2026.8283

Keywords:

Blockchain Technology, Smart Contract, Ethereum, Technical Nature, Legal Nature, Legislation, Legal Personality

Abstract [English]

Today, with the expansion of international trade, the infrastructures associated with this field have also experienced remarkable growth. Among these, two relatively emerging technologies—blockchain and the smart contracts formed on its basis—have emerged with the aim of accelerating, facilitating, and enhancing the security of financial and commercial transactions. Given the increasing pervasiveness of these technologies and their deep, potential impact on various aspects of human life and social relations, it is essential to clarify their legal and regulatory status across different domains. Achieving this goal, above all, requires a precise understanding of the nature of these two technologies. This is because, depending on the nature of each, different legal effects arise, and specific sets of rules come to govern them.On the other hand, it must be said that blockchain technology, for several reasons—including the fact that assets existing on this platform do not belong to the network itself—has not been able to acquire a legal nature and has in practice remained confined to its technical dimension. However, the situation is entirely different when it comes to smart contracts. Unlike blockchain, these contracts possess distinct legal attributes, including "legal personality." The reason for this lies both in their ability to operate independently of the contracting parties and in the existence of explicit legal provisions in this regard. This research attempts to provide a comprehensive analysis of the technical and legal nature of blockchain and smart contracts, while precisely explaining the legal issues surrounding blockchain and the smart contracts based on it.

References

Azizi, A. (2018). Daramadi bar chalesh ha ye mogharerat gozari marbot ba fanavari ye zanjireh ye blocki [An introduction to regulatory challenges related to blockchain technology]. (Report No. 1051/11/97/1397). Markaz e Pajouhesh ha ye Tose’e va Ayandeh Negari, Sazman e Barnameh va Budjeh ye Keshvar.

Chohn, A., West, T., & Parker, C. (2017). Smart after all: Blockchain, smart contracts, parametric insurance, and smart energy grids.

Clack, C. D., Bakshi, V. A., & Braine, L. (2016). Smart contracts technology: Foundations, design landscape and research directions.

Demeyer, M. (2018). Blockchain technology and smart contracts from a financial law perspective (Master’s thesis). Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University.

Feizi Chekab, G. N. (2024). Zaman e voqu e aqd az tarighe vaseteh ha ye elektronik [Time of contract conclusion through electronic intermediaries]. Pajouhesh e Hoquq va Siasat, 13.

Honarmand, M. (2011). Tejarat e elektronik va qarardad ha ye elektroniki [Electronic commerce and electronic contracts]. Mahnameh ye Dadrasi, 85.

Kissinger, H. (2019). Negarani ha ye Henry Kissinger darbare ye hush e masnooei [Henry Kissinger’s concerns about artificial intelligence] (M. Azami Maram, Trans.). Faslnameh ye Motarjem e Olum e Ensani, 4(10).

Norton Rose Fulbright. (2016a). Can smart contracts be legally binding contracts? An R3 and Norton Rose Fulbright white paper.

Norton Rose Fulbright. (2016b). Unlocking the blockchain: A global legal and regulatory guide.

Norton Rose Fulbright. (2018). Legal analysis of the governed blockchain.

Raskin, M. (2017). The law and legality of smart contract. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 1(2).

Savarayi, P. (n.d.). Tahlil e hoquqi e sanad e elektronik [Legal analysis of electronic document]. Majaleh ye Tahghighat e Hoquqi, 65.

Szabo, N. (2024). Smart contracts.

Vasali, N. (2006). Qarardad e elektronik va mabani ye e’tebar e an [Electronic contract and foundations of its validity]. Mahnameh ye Kanun, 66.

Wang, W. (2019). A survey on consensus mechanisms strategy management in blockchain networks. IEEE, 7.

Wrede, P. (2018). How technology can make insurance more inclusive (Fintech Note No. 2). World Bank Group.

Yu, Q. (2018). Design, implementation, and evaluation of blockchain enabled multi energy transaction system for district energy system (Master’s thesis). Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Chmielarz, P. (2026). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL NATURE OF BLOCKCHAIN AND SMART CONTRACTS: FROM PURE TECHNOLOGY TO LEGAL PERSONALITY. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 7(11s), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i11s.2026.8283