A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS, UNIVERSAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES, AND IMPLEMENTATION GAPS IN THE INDIAN URBAN PUBLIC OPEN SPACES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i11s.2026.8282Keywords:
Inclusive Public Spaces, Universal Design, Accessibility Standards, Prisma Systematic Review, India, Sustainability FrameworkAbstract [English]
While inclusive public open spaces are essential to equitable living in the city, they are not always achieved using accessibility standards and universal design principles, especially in fast-growing cities in the Global South. The aim of this SLR is to identify findings from current research on inclusive public open spaces, particularly in relation to the incorporation of accessibility standards and universal design principles into urban design practice. According to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, articles were identified in Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases, 1247 articles were found, 78 were included for full-text analysis. Seven themes emerged from the review: the shift from architectural to urban scale of universal design; operationalization of the seven universal design principles in the context of public open space; the limitations of existing accessibility audit methodologies; intersectional perspectives on gender, age, disability and class; gaps in the policy arena of developing countries; participatory and co-design approaches; and the emerging integration of universal design and sustainability frameworks. The challenges that still need to be addressed are the lack of representation of South Asian urban contexts, lack of incorporating multi-dimensional aspects of universal design with the environmental sustainability aspects, lack of enforcement of accessibility legislations in India, and lack of validated multi-dimensional evaluation frameworks which are specifically calibrated to Indian metropolitan public spaces. Based on the above, the review suggests a holistic framework of universal design, sustainability and user experience, which has four dimensions, and has direct implications for the rollout of the Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT 2.0 and SDG 11 in Indian cities.
References
Abdel-Razek, S. A., Barakat, H. A.-R., & Ibrahim, S. M. S. Z. (2024). Universal and Inclusive Design in Public Open Spaces for Wellbeing-Oriented Cities: Design Strategies for the Case of Alexandria Public Beach. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(6), 2037–2049. doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190604 https://
Achilleos, G. A. (2011). The Inverse Distance Weighted interpolation method and error propagation mechanism – creating a DEM from an analogue topographical map. Journal of Spatial Science, 56(2), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2011.623348
Bakken, S., Arcia, A., & Woollen, J. (2020). Promoting Latino Self-Management Through Use of Information Visualizations: A Case Study in New York City. In Health Literacy in Clinical Practice and Public Health (pp. 153–160). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI200029
Banda-Chalwe, M., Nitz, J. C., & De Jonge, D. (2014). Impact of inaccessible spaces on community participation of people with mobility limitations in Zambia. African Journal of Disability, 3(1), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v3i1.33
Basha, R. (2015). Disability and Public Space – Case Studies of Prishtina and Prizren. International Journal of Contemporary Architecture The New ARCH, (5), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.14621/tna.20150406
Beebeejaun, Y. (2017). Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2016.1255526
Carmona, M. (2010). Contemporary Public Space: Critique and Classification, Part One: Critique. Journal of Urban Design, 15(1), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800903435651
Chen, P., Yu, J., Wu, Y., Wang, L., Guo, H., & He, Y. (2024). Development of preferred sizes for building integrated lighting units (BILUs). Building and Environment, 263, 111879. j.buildenv.2024.111879 https://doi.org/10.1016/
Cohen, D. A., Marsh, T., Williamson, S., Derose, K. P., Martinez, H., Setodji, C., & McKenzie, T. L. (2010). Parks and physical activity: Why are some parks used more than others? Preventive Medicine, 50, S9 S12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.08.020
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) | Division for Inclusive Social Development (DISD). (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2026, from https://social.desa.un.org/issues/disability/crpd/ convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-crpd
Curt, C., Goc, M. L., Torres, L., & Fakhfakh, I. (2017). Multimodel-Based Diagnosis of Hydraulic Dams. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(5), 04017024. https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000670
Dane, G., Evers, S., van den Berg, P., Klippel, A., Verduijn, T., Wallgrün, J. O., & Arentze, T. (2024). Experiencing the future: Evaluating a new framework for the participatory co-design of healthy public spaces using immersive virtual reality. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 114, 102194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2024.102194
Day, K. (2006). Being Feared: Masculinity and Race in Public Space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 38(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37221
Depian, T., Li, G., Nöllenburg, M., & Wulms, J. (2023). Transitions in Dynamic Point Labeling. In R. Beecham, J. A. Long, D. Smith, Q. Zhao, & S. Wise (Eds.), 12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023) (Vol. 277, p. 2:1-2:19). Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.
Digital Technologies for Urban Metabolism Efficiency: Lessons from Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2026, from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6043
Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the Accessibility Requirements for Products and Services (Text with EEA Relevance), CONSIL, EP, 151 OJ L (2019). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/882/oj
Dupont, V. D. N. (2011). The Dream of Delhi as a Global City: The dream of Delhi as a global city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 533–554. j.1468-2427.2010.01027.x https://doi.org/10.1111/
Ewnetu, B. M., & Seo, B. K. (2025). Governance of urban informal settlements in Africa: A scoping review. Heliyon, 11(10), e43441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43441
Falú, A. (with Marman, G., & Matta, P.). (2010). Women in the city: On violence and rights. Ediciones Sur. Ghavimi, A., Schuessler, F., & Pesch, R. (2025). A framework to evaluate public green spaces with an emphasis on recreational values for sustainable urban and rural areas: A systematic review and content analysis. Heliyon, 11(2), e41553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41553
GIScience.2023.2 Dhasmana, P., Bansal, K., & Kaur, M. (2022). Assessing Gender Inclusive User Preferences: A case of Urban Public Spaces in Chandigarh. 2022 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT), 221–226. doi.org/10.1109/3ICT56508.2022.9990637 https://
Governance of Informal Settlements in Africa: Challenges, Stakeholder Roles, and Pathways to Inclusive Urban Development. (2025, July 22). African Researchers Magazine (ISSN: 2714-2787) - Premier Source for Latest African Research, Science and Scholarly News. https://www.africanresearchers.org/ governance-of-informal-settlements-in-africa-challenges-stakeholder-roles-and-pathways-to-inclusive urban-development/
Gupta, M., Ashtt, R., & Monga, A. (2025). Creating Inclusive and Safe Urban Spaces for Women A Case Study of Gender-Sensitive Urban Planning in Delhi. In A. Varma, V. Chand Sharma, & E. Tarsi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Trends in Architecture and Construction (pp. 789 807). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4988-1_43
Heylighen, A., Van Doren, C., & Vermeersch, P.-W. (2013). Enriching Our Understanding of Architecture Through Disability Experience. Open House International, 38(1), 7–19. OHI-01-2013-B0002 https://doi.org/10.1108/
Hodgetts, D., & Stolte, O. (2016). Homeless people’s leisure practices within and beyond urban socio-scapes. Urban Studies, 53(5), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015571236
Huang, Y., Ye, L., & Chen, Y. (2025). Sustainable Urban Landscape Quality: A User-Perception Framework for Public Space Assessment and Development. Sustainability, 17(9), 3992. su17093992 https://doi.org/10.3390/
Imrie, R. (2012). Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(10), 873–882. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.624250
Indoor Spatial Model and Accessibility Index for Emergency Evacuation of People with Disabilities | Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering | Vol 30, No 4. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2026, from ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CP.1943-5487.0000534 https://
IWARSSON, S., & STÅHL, A. (2003). Accessibility, usability and universal design—Positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(2), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/dre.25.2.57.66
Iwarsson, S., Wahl, H.-W., Nygren, C., Oswald, F., Sixsmith, A., Sixsmith, J., Széman, Z., & Tomsone, S. (2007). Importance of the Home Environment for Healthy Aging: Conceptual and Methodological Background of the European ENABLE–AGE Project. The Gerontologist, 47(1), 78–84. doi.org/10.1093/geront/47.1.78 https://
Kapsalis, E., Jaeger, N., & Hale, J. (2024). Disabled-by-design: Effects of inaccessible urban public spaces on users of mobility assistive devices – a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 19(3), 604–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2111723
Lassen, N., Josefsen, T., & Goia, F. (2021). Design and in-field testing of a multi-level system for continuous subjective occupant feedback on indoor climate. Building and Environment, 189, 107535. doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107535 https://
Lid, I. M. (2014). Universal Design and disability: An interdisciplinary perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36(16), 1344–1349. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.931472
Listerborn, C. (2016). Feminist struggle over urban safety and the politics of space. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 23(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815616409
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2014). Fear and safety in transit environments from the women’s perspective. Security Journal, 27(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.9
Low, S., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2013). The Politics of Public Space. Routledge. doi.org/10.4324/9780203390306 https:// Lu, G. Y., & Wong, D. W. (2008). An adaptive inverse-distance weighting spatial interpolation technique. Computers & Geosciences, 34(9), 1044–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.07.010
Malekzadeh, M., Willberg, E., Torkko, J., Korpilo, S., Hasanzadeh, K., Järv, O., & Toivonen, T. (2025, November 4). Do Street View Imagery and Public Participation GIS align: Comparative Analysis of Urban Attractiveness. arXiv.Org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05570v1
Manzini, E. (n.d.). Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Retrieved May 15, 2026, from DesignsAn-Introduction-to https://direct.mit.edu/books/book/4460/Design-When-Everybody
Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77 79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
McKenzie, T. L., Cohen, D. A., Sehgal, A., Williamson, S., & Golinelli, D. (2006). System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): Reliability and Feasibility Measures. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(s1), S208–S222. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s208
Mehta, V. (2014). Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 53–88. doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698 https://
Mitra, S. (2018). Disability, Health and Human Development. Palgrave Macmillan US. doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53638-9 https://
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pain, R. (2001). Gender, Race, Age and Fear in the City. Urban Studies, 38(5–6), 899–913. https:// https:// doi.org/10.1080/00420980120046590
Patrick, M., & McKinnon, I. (2022). Co-creating Inclusive Public Spaces: Learnings from Four Global Case Studies on inclusive Cities. The Journal of Public Space, 7(2), 93–116. jps.v7i2.1500 https://doi.org/10.32891/
Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: Different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility— historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(4), 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z
Phadke, S., Khan, S., & Ranade, S. (2011a). Why loiter? Women and risk on Mumbai streets. Penguin Books.
Pineo, H. (2022b). Towards healthy urbanism: Inclusive, equitable and sustainable (THRIVES) – an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis. Cities & Health, 6(5), 974–992. doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527 https://
Raj, S. I., Mohino, I., & Khatun, F. (2024). Socio-Economic Impact of the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) System in Dhaka: A Case Study of Mirpur Stations. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 8(2), 436–459. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n2-9
Roy, A., Ghosh, A., Bhandari, S., Sundaram, S., & Mallick, T. K. (2020). Perovskite Solar Cells for BIPV Application: A Review. Buildings, 10(7), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10070129 Section508.gov. (n.d.). Section508.Gov. Retrieved May 15, 2026, from universal-design/ https://www.section508.gov/develop/
Selanon, P., & Chuangchai, W. (2024). Improving Accessibility to Urban Greenspaces for People with Disabilities: A Modified Universal Design Approach. Journal of Planning Literature, 39(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231212662
Soltanifar, M. (with Sharafi, H., Lotfi, F. H., Pedrycz, W., & Allahviranloo, T.). (2023). Preferential Voting and Applications: Approaches Based on Data Envelopment Analysis (1st ed). Springer International Publishing AG. Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Stevens, Q. (2007). The Ludic City (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203961803
Stuck at the Front Door: Gender, Fear of Crime and the Challenge of Creating Safer Space—Carolyn Whitzman, 2007. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2026, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a38449
The Dream of Delhi as a Global City—DUPONT - 2011—International Journal of Urban and Regional Research—Wiley Online Library. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2026, from doi/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01027.x
The New Urban Agenda. (n.d.). Habitat III. Retrieved May 15, 2026, from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ https://habitat3.org/the-new-urban agenda/ Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45.
Tonkiss, F. (2014). Cities by Design (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment (pp. 85–125). Springer US. doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4 https://
Universal and Inclusive Design in Public Open Spaces for Wellbeing-Oriented Cities: Design Strategies for the Case of Alexandria Public Beach | IIETA. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190604
Vasiljevic-Tomic, D., Jerkovic-Babovic, B., & Zoric, A. (2017). Redefining space of the contemporary context of the city: Movement and perception as aspects of accessibility. Facta Universitatis - Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering, 15(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE161021015V
WHO European Healthy Cities Network. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2026, from groups/who-european-healthy-cities-network https://www.who.int/europe/
WHO. (2022). WHO Healthy Cities programme: Annual report 2022. World Health Organization.
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough.’ Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017
Wong, R. C. P., Szeto, W. Y., Yang, L., Li, Y. C., & Wong, S. C. (2017). Elderly users’ level of satisfaction with public transport services in a high-density and transit-oriented city. Journal of Transport & Health, 7, 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.10.004
World Urbanization Prospects. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2026, from https://population.un.org/wup/
Xiao, X., Ye, Q., & Dong, X. (2024). Using Importance–Performance Analysis to Reveal Priorities for Multifunctional Landscape Optimization in Urban Parks. Land, 13(5), 564. land13050564 https://doi.org/10.3390/
Yabes, R. (2000). Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50(4), 270–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00063-3
Yau, Y., Lau, W. K., & Wing Ho, D. C. (2015). Principle of Selectivity in Housing Rehabilitation Subsidies: Case Study in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 141(3), 05014019. doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000231
Zhang, J., Liu, J., Yang, H., Quan, J., Wang, L., He, Q., & Li, F. (2024). Sustainable urban landscape quality: A user-perception framework for public space assessment and development. Sustainability, 17(9), 3992.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Simran Vats, Ranganath M Singari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
