NARRATIVES OF JUSTICE AND POWER: A LAW AND LITERATURE ANALYSIS OF LEGAL CONSCIOUSNESS IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH TEXTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i11s.2026.8275Keywords:
Law and Literature, Legal Consciousness, Justice, Power, Judicial NarrativesAbstract [English]
The interrelation of law and literature provides a critical approach towards the legal texts as narrative and cultural texts and not as documents only. This paper explores the way justice and power are constructed narratively in the current English law books, especially the Supreme Court decisions. The proposed study with the qualitative and interpretive research design is based on the idea of narrative analysis, discourse analysis, and legal consciousness theory to examine the influence of judicial language on the formation of meanings of power, rights, and legitimacy. They were analysed with thematic coding, and a purposive sample of judgments was identified with the use of thematic coding. The results indicate that judicial rulings can be understood as narratives in a structured form in which justice is viewed as a dynamic and situational process, and it is usually based on constitutional and moral arguments. Power is expressed as a complicated interrelation of state power and judicial control, where the law serves as a source of legitimization of as well as the regulation of institutional control. Moreover, the analysis proves that legal texts themselves are also an active participant in the development of legal consciousness that shapes the perceptions and attitudes of individuals towards legal systems. The analysis of legal judgments in terms of law and literature highlights the value of the study of legal discourse as a cultural and interpretive practice that is situated in the wider socio-political framework. The study adds to the important debates of justice, inequality, and governance and is consistent with current academic endeavours to analyse law as a narrative construction site and social meaning.
References
Acar, I. (2023). Narratives on Traumatic Lived Experiences as Pathways to Decolonization of Gender: A Study of Vulnerability, Risk and Agency of Iraq’s Yazidi (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University (Turkey)).
De Hart, B., & Besselsen, E. (2021). ‘Everything went according to the rules’. Female citizen sponsors’ legal consciousness, intimate citizenship and family migration law. Identities, 28(1), 37-55.
Ergashev, I. A. (2025). Civil Society and Legal Culture: Shaping Legal Consciousness Through Semantic Signs: EI Abdurasulovich. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 38(7), 2155-2180.
Feddersen, M., Wilenmann, J., Cavieres, J., & Gambardella, M. (2024). “The state is something that disappoints”: legal consciousness amid institutional dissatisfaction. Law & Society Review, 58(1), 69-94.
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2020). Communicating dissent in judicial opinions: A comparative, genre-based analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 33(2), 381-401.
Griffin, D. (2024). Considering legal English. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 31(1), 77-98.
Hilbink, L., & Ramos, V. S. (2024). Citizen awakening? Exploring legal consciousness in a context of mass political mobilization. Law & Society Review, 58(2), 243-269.
Hilson, C. (2022). The role of narrative in environmental law: The nature of tales and tales of nature. Journal of Environmental Law, 34(1), 1-24.
Manderson, D. (2019). Danse Macabre: temporalities of law in the visual arts. Cambridge University Press.
Marini, G. (2025). The Politics of Space, the Space of Politics in Comparative Law: G. Marini. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 38(7), 2137-2153.
Paskey, S. (2021). Reframing Law's Domain: Narrative, Rhetoric, and the Forms of Legal Rules. Narrative, 29(2), 178-191.
Stern, S. (2025). Reading and writing race in law and literature. European Journal of English Studies, 29(1), 171-177.
Young, K. M., & Billings, K. R. (2020). Legal consciousness and cultural capital. Law & Society Review, 54(1), 33-65.
Zhang, C., & Wang, Z. (2025). Meaning transformation and recontextualization: from multimodal courtroom discourse to legal judgments. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-14.
Vxrun.sonii. (2026). LEGAL-Text-Supreme Court Judgments (India) [Data set]. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/vxrunsonii/supreme-court-judgments-txt
Dzüvichü, K., & Chong, S. T. (2026). Mesopotamian Kingship in the Bronze Age as Portrayed in Sumerian & Babylonian Literature. ShodhGyan-NU: Journal of Literature and Culture Studies, 4(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhgyan.v4.i1.2026.87
Belov, M. (2022, July). Constitutional Consciousness: Finding a Black Cat in a Dark Room Through Semiotic Epistemology of Imprints in ‘Shadow Constitutionalisms’. In IVR World Congress (pp. 237-258). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Hage, J. (2022, July). Legal consciousness and the internal aspect of rules. In IVR World Congress (pp. 201-222). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Holtermann, J. V. H., Krešić, M., & Novak, M. (2022, July). Introduction to Legal Consciousness. In IVR World Congress (pp. 1-25). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Krešić, M. (2022, July). Taking legal consciousness seriously. In IVR World Congress (pp. 29-50). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Novak, M. (2022, July). Legal consciousness revisited: Ross Meeting Jung, and beyond. In IVR World Congress (pp. 73-85). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Olsen, H. P., & Toddington, S. (2022, July). Legal Consciousness and the Understanding of Legal Reason. In IVR World Congress (pp. 223-236). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Sardo, A., & Grillo, A. (2022, July). Mapping legal consciousness in comparative law: An essay on methodology. In IVR World Congress (pp. 99-121). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Tasneem Sultana, Dr. Kiran Mamgain, Dr. Seema Surendran, Dr. Gayathri N M, Bineet Singh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.






















