IMMERSIVE TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN HEALTHCARE: READINESS, BARRIERS, AND PATIENT OUTCOMES

Authors

  • Reetika Taneja Research Scholar, Department of Business Management, University School of Business, Chandigarh University, Mohali- 140413, Punjab, India
  • Dr. Hitakshi Dutta Professor and Associate Director- IQAC, Chandigarh University, Mohali- 140413, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7915

Keywords:

Immersive Technology, Healthcare Institutions, Digital Health Transformation, Clinical Innovation, Patient engagement

Abstract [English]

Purpose: The incorporation of Immersive Technologies, namely, AR (Augmented Reality), VR (Virtual Reality) and MR (Mixed Reality) is increasing rapidly across all the business sectors. Healthcare institutions are also integrating these technologies to strengthen clinical treatment, patient care, medical training and patient interaction. This study makes an effort to assess how healthcare institutions understand, adopt, and experience the integration of Immersive Technologies, more especially emphasizing on perceived value, implementation challenges and institutional readiness.


Methodology: A quantitative as well as qualitative analysis of questionnaires, discussions and interrogations with doctors, hospital administrators, and technology staff employed at healthcare institutions that are using or exploring immersive technologies like VR, AR, and MR. The interviews and responses provided a report on the different methods by which these institutions implement technology, as well as the upsides and downsides they have witnessed. The responses were thoroughly reviewed to find prevalent themes and patterns.


Findings: Immersive technology is an effective tool to enhance overall patient satisfaction and outcomes. The technology improves the treatment through personalized care and interactive visuals. Despite its numerous benefits, concerns about implementation costs, ethicality, time constraints, and the requirement for specialized training for the healthcare providers involved in the treatment procedure remains a significant challenge. Among 60 participants in this study, 41.7% identified that their institutions were sufficiently equipped to handle these technologies, while 33.3% disagreed and 25% were uncertain. 90% of the doctors had some awareness about immersive technologies in healthcare, with 41.7% confident and 48.3% having merely basic knowledge, and only 10% were entirely unaware. A significant number of doctors indicated time constraints (75% agreed, 11.7% strongly agreed) and cost (76.7% agreed, 16.7% strongly agreed) as significant barriers, while over 80% acknowledged ethical challenges. Furthermore, 80% of doctors believed immersive technologies could make healthcare more patient-centered and engaging, enhancing interactions between patients and providers, though 16.7% were uncertain and only a small fraction (3.3%) disagreed. 


Research Limitations: This study includes views from a few healthcare institutions, so the results may not be representative of all types of hospitals or clinics. Longitudinal studies on the changes in the patterns of adoption and challenges to implementation of immersive technology can be studied in future research.


Practical Implications: The findings are relevant to healthcare service providers in terms of effective implementation of immersive technology. By addressing concerns related to cost, training, and ethical issues, healthcare institutions can improve their effectiveness of implementation and integrate immersive technologies to enhance patient care and treatment procedures.


Originality: With emphasis on real word implications and institutional readiness, this study provides a distinctive institution-centered viewpoint on immersive technology in healthcare.  It provides basis for further research and practical frameworks to harness immersive innovations in healthcare institutions.

References

Analysis, M. (2019). GLOBAL IMMERSIVE TECHNOLOGY IN.

Antoniou, P. E., Varella, A., Pickering, J. D., Chatzimallis, C., Moumtzi, V., & Bamidis, P. D. (2024). Thematic analysis of stakeholder perceptions for co-creative healthcare XR resource design and development; traversing a minefield of opportunities. Frontiers in Digital Health, 6(April). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1341349

Bui, T., Ruiz-Cardozo, M. A., Dave, H. S., Barot, K., Kann, M. R., Joseph, K., Lopez-Alviar, S., Trevino, G., Brehm, S., Yahanda, A. T., & Molina, C. A. (2024). Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality Applications for Surgical Rehearsal, Operative Execution, and Patient Education in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review. Medicina (Lithuania), 60(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60020332

Chung, O. S., Robinson, T., Johnson, A. M., Dowling, N. L., Ng, C. H., Yücel, M., & Segrave, R. A. (2022). Implementation of Therapeutic Virtual Reality Into Psychiatric Care: Clinicians’ and Service Managers’ Perspectives. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12(January), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.791123

Coelho, G., Rabelo, N. N., Vieira, E., Mendes, K., Zagatto, G., de Oliveira, R. S., Raposo-Amaral, C. E., Yoshida, M., de Souza, M. R., Fagundes, C. F., Teixeira, M. J., & Figueiredo, E. G. (2020). Augmented reality and physical hybrid model simulation for preoperative planning of metopic craniosynostosis surgery. Neurosurgical Focus, 48(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.FOCUS19854

Glegg, S. M. N., & Levac, D. E. (2018). Barriers, Facilitators and Interventions to Support Virtual Reality Implementation in Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review. PM and R, 10(11), 12371251.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.07.004

Iqbal, A. I., Aamir, A., Hammad, A., Hafsa, H., Basit, A., Oduoye, M. O., Anis, M. W., Ahmed, S., Younus, M. I., & Jabeen, S. (2024). Immersive Technologies in Healthcare: An In-Depth Exploration of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Enhancing Patient Care, Medical Education, and Training Paradigms. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241293311

Jain, S., Lee, S., Barber, S. R., Chang, E. H., & Son, Y. J. (2020). Virtual reality based hybrid simulation for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 10(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2019.1692263

Javvaji, C. K., Reddy, H., Vagha, J. D., Taksande, A., Kommareddy, A., & Reddy, N. S. (2024). Immersive Innovations : Exploring the Diverse Applications of Virtual Reality ( VR ) in Healthcare. 16(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56137

Khlaif, Z., Salama, N., Hamamra, B., & Mousa, A. (2025). Factors Influencing Educators ’ Perspectives on Accepting Extended Reality in Health Care Education : Qualitative Study Corresponding Author : 11, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2196/65042

Kouijzer, M. M. T. E., Kip, H., Bouman, Y. H. A., & Kelders, S. M. (2023). Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implementation Science Communications, 4(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2

Liu, Z., Ren, L., Xiao, C., Zhang, K., & Demian, P. (2022). Virtual Reality Aided Therapy towards Health 4.0: A Two-Decade Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental

Research and Public Health, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031525

Mallari, B., Spaeth, E. K., Goh, H., & Boyd, B. S. (2019). Virtual reality as an analgesic for acute and chronic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pain Research, 12, 2053–2085. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S200498

Mondal, H., & Mondal, S. (2025). Adopting augmented reality and virtual reality in medical education in resource-limited settings: constraints and the way forward. Advances in Physiology Education, 49(2), 503–507. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00027.2025

Yang, E. (2023). Implications of immersive technologies in healthcare sector and its built environment. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 5(September). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2023.1184925

Yap, K. Y. (2024). Navigating the Healthcare Metaverse : Immersive Technologies and Future Perspectives. 368–383.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Taneja, R., & Dutta, H. (2026). IMMERSIVE TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN HEALTHCARE: READINESS, BARRIERS, AND PATIENT OUTCOMES. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 7(7s), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7915