DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF A LIFE SKILLS ASSESSMENT SCALE (LSAS-21)

Shumila Fatma Naqvi; Ritu Chandra

doi:10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7914

Authors

Shumila Fatma Naqvi Research Scholar, Institute of Education Research, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University , Village-Hadauri, Post-Tindola, Lucknow -Deva Road, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India
Dr. Ritu Chandra Principal, Institute of Education Research, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Village-Hadauri, Post-Tindola, Lucknow –Deva Road, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7914

Keywords:

Life Skills, Scale Development, Standardization, Psychosocial Competence, Assessment Scale

Abstract [English]

The present study focuses on the development and standardization of a Life Skills Assessment Scale (LSAS-21) designed to measure essential psychosocial competencies required for effective functioning in daily life. Life skills such as self-awareness, communication, resilience, empathy, participation, critical thinking, creativity and problem-solving, decision-making, and negotiation play a crucial role in personal, social, and academic adjustment.
The initial item pool was developed after an extensive review of literature and existing life skills frameworks. The scale was prepared using a Likert-type format and evaluated by subject experts for content validity. A pilot study was conducted on a sample of N = 30, and the reliability was found to be high (α = 0.953). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated a multidimensional structure of the scale.
The main standardization study was conducted on a sample of N = 400, and the reliability of the final scale was α = 0.702. Construct validity was examined using correlation analysis and factor analysis. Pearson’s correlation showed positive and significant relationships among items, indicating a common underlying construct. Further, Principal Component Analysis with Varimax rotation supported the suitability of the data for factor analysis. The KMO value was 0.755, and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was significant (χ² = 837.690, df = 210, p < .001), confirming adequacy for factor analysis.
The final LSAS-21 consists of 21 items covering nine dimensions: Self-Awareness, Communication, Resilience, Empathy, Participation, Critical Thinking, Creativity and Problem Solving, Decision Making, and Negotiation. The scale demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties and can be effectively used by researchers, counselors, and educators for assessing life skills.

References

Bandura, A., & Hall, P. (2018). Albert Bandura and social learning theory. Learning theories for early years, 78, 35-36.

Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various χ 2 approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 296-298.

Beck, A. T. (1979). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. Penguin.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Cronin, L., Allen, J., Ellison, P., Marchant, D., Levy, A., & Harwood, C. (2021). Development and initial validation of the life skills ability scale for higher education students. Studies in Higher Education, 46(6), 1011-1024.

Ellis, A. (1962). Reason and emotion in psychotherapy.

Erikson, E. (1982). Psychosocial development.

Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Sage Publications Inc.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. New York.

Ndirangu, A. N., Wamue–Ngare, G., & Wango, G. (2013). Gender factors in implementation of life skills education in secondary schools in Nairobi, Kenya. International Journal of education and research, 1(5), 1-18.

Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd edition (MacGraw-Hill, New York).

Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: Oxford university press. London, UK [Google Scholar].

Richard Jessor, P. D. (1991). Risk behaviour in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal, Of Adolescent Health, 12, 597-605.

Rogers, C. R. (1995). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Subasree, R., Nair, A. R., & Ranjan, R. (2014). The Life Skills Assessment Scale: the construction and validation of a new comprehensive scale for measuring Life Skills. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(1), 50-58.

UNICEF, I. (2019). Comprehensive life skills framework. New Delhi: UNICEF.

World Health Organization. (1994). Life skills education for children and adolescents in schools. Pt. 1, Introduction to life skills for psychosocial competence. Pt. 2, Guidelines to facilitate the development and implementation of life skills programmes (No. WHO/MNH/PSF/93.7 A. Rev. 2). World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (1997). Life skills education in schools: Programme on mental health. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2003). Skills for health: Skills-based health education including life skills: An important component of a child-friendly/health-promoting school. World Health Organization.