ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ADDRESSING ENGLISH LEARNING DISABILITIES: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY ON DYSLEXIA, ADHD, DEAFNESS AND VISUAL IMPAIRMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7894Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Dyslexia, ADHD, Deaf Education, Blind Learners, Inclusive Education, English Language Teaching, Assistive Technology, Universal Design for LearningAbstract [English]
Background: English language acquisition, involving reading, writing, listening, and speaking, presents significant cognitive and sensory challenges for children with disabilities such as dyslexia, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), deafness, and visual impairment. Traditional pedagogical methods often assume uniform cognitive abilities, marginalizing these learners.
Objectives: This paper critically examines the role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in creating inclusive, adaptive, and personalized English learning environments for these four disability groups.
Methods: Adopting a qualitative systematic review approach, the study synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed journal articles (2018–2026), AI in education research, and assistive technology studies, grounded in Cognitive Load Theory, Baddeley’s Model of Working Memory, and Universal Design for Learning (UDL).
Findings: AI-driven technologies including Natural Language Processing (NLP), speech recognition, computer vision, and adaptive learning systems significantly enhance early diagnosis, individualized instruction, and multimodal learning. For dyslexia, AI improves phonological decoding; for ADHD, it segments content to manage attention; for deaf learners, real-time captioning bridges auditory gaps; and for blind learners, screen readers and OCR enable text access.
Conclusion: AI, when aligned with inclusive pedagogy and human-centered design, holds transformative potential for equitable English language education. However, success depends on addressing ethical concerns (data privacy, algorithmic bias), technological inequities (digital divide), and pedagogical integration (teacher training). AI should empower, not replace, educators.
References
Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Learning Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. (p. 75)
Baumann, T., & Melle, I. (2019). Evaluation of a digital UDL-based learning environment in inclusive chemistry education. Chemistry Teacher International, 1 (2), 20180026. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2018-0026
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4 (11), 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5 (1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Coppola, R., et al. (2019). Combining UDL and culturally sustaining pedagogy. [Phenomenological evidence].
DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Faisal, K., & Fortino, A. (2025). STEM With Generative AI: Fundamentals of Data Warehousing. In 2025 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEC64801.2025.11147378
Phuong, Y. H., & Berkeley, D. (2017). Adaptive equity-oriented pedagogy. [Randomized controlled trial].
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12 (2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sabin Kumar S, Dr. R. Vasuhi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























