SACRED SPACES, INSTITUTIONAL POWER, AND PERSONAL REVOLT IN THE DA VINCI CODE AND THE FRENCH LIEUTENANT’S WOMAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7809Keywords:
Sacred Space, Institutional Religion, Personal Revolt, The Da Vinci Code, The French Lieutenant's WomanAbstract [English]
This paper offers a comparative reading of Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code (2003) and John Fowles’s The French Lieutenant’s Woman (1969), arguing that sacred spaces in both novels function as crucibles where institutional power and personal faith collide. It distinguishes between formal sacred spaces, churches, chapels, cathedrals, and symbolically sacred or liminal spaces such as The Cobb, the Undercliff, crypts, and museums. Formal sanctuaries embody institutional dogma and social control, while liminal spaces enable private epiphanies, feminist resistance, and existential self-discovery. Drawing on Kilde’s account of sacred space as culturally constructed, Van Huyssteen’s narrative theology, and existentialist perspectives from Tillich, Sartre, Beauvoir, and Taylor, the study shows how space in these narratives is never neutral but charged with theological and ideological significance. Both novels dramatise a broader cultural shift from publicly anchored, church-centred religion to privatised, experiential forms of the sacred. At the same time, the analysis acknowledges that ‘personal’ sacred spaces remain in dialogue with, and partly defined by, the religious institutions they contest. The paper argues that sacred spaces in these texts operate as ‘sites of tria’ where characters renegotiate the meaning of faith, authority, and freedom.
References
Bauer, D. M. (1999). Feminist dialogics and the "hopeful monster": Rewriting the romance in The French Lieutenant's Woman. Bryn Mawr College Institutional Repository.
Beauvoir, S. de. (2011). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). Vintage. (Original work published 1949)
Brown, D. (2003). The Da Vinci Code. Doubleday.
Cooper, P. (1991). The fiction of John Fowles: Tradition, art, and the loneliness of selfhood. UMI Research Press.
Eddins, D. (1984). John Fowles. Twayne. (Original work published 1979)
Fowles, J. (1969). The French lieutenant’s woman. Little, Brown & Company.
Ji, Q., & Li, M. (2013). Freedom in The French Lieutenant’s Woman. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2052–2060. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.11.2052-2060
Kilde, J. H. (2022). Introduction: The spatial turn in theory and practice. In The Oxford handbook of religious space. Oxford University Press.
Lynch, G. (2012). The sacred in the modern world: A cultural sociological approach. Oxford University Press.
Özdemir, D. (2024). Postmodern feminism in The French Lieutenant’s Woman: From madness to liberation. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 7(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378021319_Postmodern_Feminism_in_John_Fowles%27s_the_French_Lieutenant%27s_Woman_From_Madness_to_Liberation
Salami, A., & Soltani, H. (2023). Female liberation in John Fowles’ The French Lieutenant's Woman. Revista de Investigaciones Universidad del Quindio, 35(1), 391–403.
Sartre, J.-P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism (C. Macomber, Trans.). Yale University Press. (Original work published 1946)
Schroeder, C. T. (2021). Secular sacralities: The creation of “sacred” space in consumer culture. Journal of Contemporary Religion, 36(3), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537903.2021.1933633
Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Harvard University Press.
Tillich, P. (1952). The courage to be. Yale University Press.
Van der Tol, M., & Gorski, P. S. (2022). Secularisation as the fragmentation of the sacred and of sacred space. Religion, State & Society, 50(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2022.2122234
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gheni Kadhim Azeez Alghanim, Dr. Siti Noor Fazelah Binti Mohd Noor, Zainab Ameer Jabbar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























