ANTHROPOCENE AND ECOLOGICAL CONCERNS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NOVEL AND FILM DUNE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i5s.2026.7685Keywords:
Planetary Imagery, Cinematic Ecology, Anthropocene, Environmental Crisis, Posthumanism, Nonhuman Agency, Ecocriticism, Resource ExtractionAbstract [English]
The paper discusses about Dune by Frank Herbert and its film adaptation as an ecological story of Arrakis. Rather than viewing Arrakis as an unusual environment to be used as a political conflict, the article understands the desert planet as a living system that determines scarcity, violence, and biological complexity that influence social and imperial institutions built over it. Along with ecocriticism, posthumanism, and film theory, the article claims that Dune does not just show ecology as a setting but acts as a fundamental framework of narrative. The functions of power, survival of life, all come together with climate, water, sandworms, and spice. Throughout the novel, Herbert repeatedly demonstrates that environmental knowledge is related to political consequences, so that understanding of the planet is necessary to survive. The same ecological logic is presented with visualization in film through broad desert landscapes, the exposed settlements, suspended harvesting machines, and the emergence of sandworm, which repetitively demonstrates the frailty of human technology. This article will argue that Dune provides one of the most effective approaches to thinking about the Anthropocene by reading the novel and film together. Arrakis turns into a speculative reflection about contemporary extractive systems. It may be regarded as an imperial order that requires dependence on resources that it lacks the ability to generate itself and an ecology that lacks complete control. The contrast of imperial exploitation and Fremen adaptation further explains the environmental politics of the text. It implies that it is not those who attempt to dominate the planet that will survive, but those who learn to know its limits and adapt to its needs. Dune thus comes out not only as a science-fiction epic, but also as a warning on planetary life, and challenges readers and viewers to reconsider how human ambition interacts with ecological systems that sustain life.
References
Abram, D. (1996). The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World. Pantheon Books.
Balcıoğlu, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the Sands of Emotion: A Sentiment and Subjectivity Analysis of Dune (2021) Characters. SineFilozofi, 18, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.31122/sinefilozofi.1455784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31122/sinefilozofi.1455784
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Polity Press.
Bruno, G. (2002). Atlas of Emotion: Journeys in Art, Architecture, and Film. Verso.
Buell, L. (2005). The Future of Environmental Criticism: Environmental Crisis and Literary Imagination. Blackwell.
Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1086/596640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/596640
Crutzen, P. J., and Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. Global Change Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The Time-Image (H. Tomlinson and R. Galeta, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Elsaesser, T., and Hagener, M. (2015). Film Theory: An Introduction Through the Senses (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740768 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740768
Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806838
Glotfelty, C., and Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. University of Georgia Press.
Hall, M. (2011). Plants as Persons: A Philosophical Botany. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438434308 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438434308
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
Heise, U. K. (2008). Sense of Place and Sense of Planet: The Environmental Imagination of the Global. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335637.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195335637.001.0001
Heise, U. K. (2016). Imagining Extinction: The Cultural Meanings of Endangered Species. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226358338.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226358338.001.0001
Herbert, F. (1965). Dune. Chilton Books.
Iovino, S., and Oppermann, S. (2014). Material Ecocriticism. Indiana University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt16gzq85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt16gzq85
Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. Verso.
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime (C. Porter, Trans.). Polity Press.
LeMenager, S. (2014). Living Oil: Petroleum Culture in the American Century. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899425.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899425.001.0001
Lefebvre, M. (Ed.). (2006). Landscape and Film. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203959404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203959404
MacDonald, S. (2013). The Ecocinema Experience: Cinema, Environment, and Pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. Verso.
Morton, T. (2010). The Ecological Thought. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674056732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674056732
Plumwood, V. (2002). Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. Routledge.
Rigby, K. (2015). Dancing with Disaster: Environmental Histories, Narratives, and Ethics for Perilous Times. University of Virginia Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x1r8s DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt13x1r8s
Sobchack, V. (2004). Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520937826 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520937826
Sticchi, F. (2022). Desert Power: Disenchantment, Misrecognition, and Geo-Philosophy in Denis Villeneuve’s Dune: Part One. SineFilozofi, 7(13), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31122/sinefilozofi.1068959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31122/sinefilozofi.1068959
Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. Yale University Press.
Szeman, I. (2017). On Petrocultures: Globalization, Culture, and Energy. West Virginia University Press.
Villeneuve, D. (Director). (2021). Dune: Part One [Film]. Legendary Pictures; Warner Bros. Pictures.
Wander, M. G. (2022). A Genuine Messiah: The Erosion of Political Messaging in Dune (2021). Ekphrasis: Images, Cinema, Theory, Media, 28(2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.24193/ekphrasis.28.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/ekphrasis.28.4
Zapf, H. (2016). Literature as Cultural Ecology: Sustainable Texts. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474274685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474274685
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yash Dahiya, Dr. Mayur Chhikara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
