CHOREOGRAPHING LANGUAGE LEARNING: PERFORMATIVE DYNAMICS OF AI AND COGNITIVE PEDAGOGY IN ENGLISH TEACHING

Authors

  • Lakshmi K. Raghavan Research Scholar, Department of English, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, (Deemed University), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Dr. D. Lourdhu Mary Assistant Professor of English, Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, (Deemed University), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Mekha Sebastian Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Rajagiri College of Management and Applied Sciences, Kakkana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7409

Keywords:

AI, Cognitive Linguistics, Choreographed Pedagogy, ELT, Performative Language

Abstract [English]

The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence in education is setting the scene of dramatic change in the perception and performance of the English Language Teaching. It presents fresh opportunities of individualised studying and a pictorial rich, acting interactive involvement with language. Cognitive Linguistics studies how the language is related to human thinking and it gives us a dynamic script to this transformational combination. The article analyses the association of the cognitive linguistic theories in ELT and AI tools, with an investigation of their theatrical effects on pedagogy and learners. It uses qualitative data such as classroom observations read as performative enactments, journal entries written by students and notes made by teacher-researchers as assessment of effectiveness. The paper focuses on the following three questions: (1) What are the major benefits of using cognitive linguistic theories in ELT in the era of AI? (2) Do these staged approaches have any impact on teachers and students? (3) Are embodied cognitive linguistic methods able to deal with learning problems? The study concludes that AI that mimics the human cognitive patterns facilitates better understanding, better memory and self-directed learning, and redefines the role of the instructor as the orchestrator of advanced, performative pedagogical practices.

References

Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M. J., & Oteiza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6, 8–24.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Baker, R. S., Ocumpaugh, J., Gowda, S. M., Heffernan, N. T., & Heffernan, C. L. (2019). The impact of using off-the-shelf, grade-appropriate language and domain models on understanding and retention. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29(3), 346-370.

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Bulger, M., & Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2018). Regulating the future: Understanding the societal impacts of artificial intelligence. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Dubey, A. K., & Dubey, A. (2026). Digitalization in Teaching and Learning: Impact on Student Engagement and Academic Achievement. ShodhAI: Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 3(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v3.i1.2026.73

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press. https://www.brsu.by/sites/default/files/englang/Distance/strizhevich_evans_green_-_cognitivelinguistics-anintroduction.pdf

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin Publishing Co. https://brenocon.com/Fillmore%201982_2up.pdf

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press. https://archive.org/details/bodyinmindbodily0000john

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. https://ceulearning.ceu.edu/pluginfile.php/100337/mod_forum/attachment/9319/Metaphors%20We%20Live%20By.pdf

Levy, R., & Windmann, A. (2020). Intelligent computer-assisted language learning. In N. Van Deusen-Scholl & S. May (Eds.), Second and Foreign Language Education (pp. 449-469). Springer.

Mananay, Janet. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Language Teaching: Effectiveness, Challenges, and Strategies. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 23. 361-382. 10.26803/ijlter.23.9.19.

Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2020). Neural machine translation: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 42(9), 2262-2286.

Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

Raghavan, L. K., Mary, D. L., & Sebastian, M. (2026). CHOREOGRAPHING LANGUAGE LEARNING: PERFORMATIVE DYNAMICS OF AI AND COGNITIVE PEDAGOGY IN ENGLISH TEACHING. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 7(7s), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i7s.2026.7409