SUSTAINABILITY, ETHICAL CAPITAL, AND INVESTMENT BEHAVIOUR: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM ESG MUTUAL FUND PREFERENCES IN CULTURAL AND CREATIVE INDUSTRIES

Authors

  • Purnima Negi Research Scholar, PhD (Finance),School of Management and Commerce Studies (SMCS), Shri Guru Ram Rai University, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand-248001, India
  • Dr. Mini Srivastava Associate Professor, School of Management and Commerce Studies (SMCS), Shri Guru Ram Rai University, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, Uttarakhand-248001, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2026.7194

Keywords:

Esg Mutual Funds, Sustainable Investing, Ethical Capital, Investment Behaviour, Cultural and Creative Industries, Behavioural Finance

Abstract [English]

The accelerated growth of the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing has altered capital allocation trends, especially in cultural and creative industries (CCI) in which sustainability and ethical capital play a major role in investor sentiment. Nonetheless, there is a weak empirical research concerning the impact of sustainability perceptions and ethical orientation on ESG mutual fund choices in this industry. The fundamental issue in this study is that there is not quantitative knowledge on the drivers of behaviour in ESG investment choices among investors that are involved in CCI-related funds. The study incorporates a behavioural finance model that incorporates the sustainability consciousness, ethical capital perception, risk tolerance and expected return orientation. A questionnaire was given out to 420 retail and institutional investors in a structured form, and then it was empirically analyzed in terms of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and logistic regression. The findings indicate that sustainability awareness can have a positive impact on ESG mutual fund preference by 48 percentage points whereas perceived ethical capital can be used to determine investment likelihood by 37 percentage points. As compared to traditional motives of return maximization, which explain 18 percent of the decision variance, risk-adjusted expectations of returns explain 29 percent of the variance. Moreover, the demographic moderation analysis showed that the millennial investors have a preference of 52% higher in ESG allocation than other age groups do. The general model accounts 64 percent of variance in the selection behavior in ESG mutual funds. The results affirm the fact that sustainability-oriented ethical considerations are much more important than the pure financial aspects of investment decisions in the cultural and creative industries. These findings are empirical evidence in favour of the incorporation of ethical capital measures into the portfolio strategy planning and policy-making of sustainable development of finance.

References

Alhazemi, A. (2025). Integrating ESG Framework With Social Sustainability Metrics: A Dual SEM-PLS Formative-Reflective Model Perspective. Sustainability, 17(6), 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062566 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062566

Arajpure, V. G., Banspal, V., Dasariya, R., Verma, M., and Kuhike, G. (2025, May). Design of Integrated Multifunctional Robotic Arm With AGVs for Smart Industrial Automation. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 14(1), 24–27.

Arvidsson, S., and Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG Reporting Quantity, Quality and Performance: Where to Now for Environmental Policy and Practice? Business Strategy and the Environment, 31, 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937

Chandan, A., John, M., and Potdar, V. (2023). Achieving UN SDGs in Food Supply Chain Using Blockchain Technology. Sustainability, 15, 2109. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032109

De Carlos Fraile, L., Crespo-Cebada, E., Mirón-Sanguino, Á. S., and Díaz-Caro, C. (2023). Is Investor Behavior on Sustainable Products Heterogeneous? The Case of Spanish Investors on Investment in SGDs. Economics and Business Letters, 12(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.12.2.2023.115-120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17811/ebl.12.2.2023.115-120

Delle Foglie, A., and Keshminder, J. S. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities of SRI Sukuk Toward Financial System Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(10), 3202–3225. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2022-0601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-04-2022-0601

Dervi, U. D., Khan, A., Saba, I., Hassan, M. K., and Paltrinieri, A. (2022). Green and Socially Responsible Finance: Past, Present and Future. Managerial Finance, 48(8), 1250–1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2021-0561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-11-2021-0561

He, B., and Ma, C. (2024). Can the Inclusiveness of Foreign Capital Improve Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance? Evidence From China. Sustainability, 16, 9626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229626

Islam, Q., and Ali Khan, S. M. (2024). Assessing Consumer Behavior in Sustainable Product Markets: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach With Partial Least Squares Analysis. Sustainability, 16, 3400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083400

Kocmanová, A., Dočekalová, M. P., Meluzín, T., and Škapa, S. (2020). Sustainable Investing Model for Decision Makers (Based on Research of Manufacturing Industry in the Czech Republic). Sustainability, 12(20), 8342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208342

Leong, Y. R., Tajudeen, F. P., and Yeong, W. C. (2021). Bibliometric and Content Analysis of the Internet of Things Research: A Social Science Perspective. Online Information Review, 45(6). https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0358

Marzuki, A., Nor, F. M., Ramli, N. A., Basah, M. Y. A., and Aziz, M. R. A. (2023). The Influence of ESG, SRI, Ethical, and Impact Investing Activities on Portfolio and Financial Performance—Bibliometric Analysis/Mapping and Clustering Analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(7), 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16070321

Muñoz-Muñoz, E., Crespo-Cebada, E., Corchado, J. C., and Diaz-Caro, C. (2025). Behavior and Sustainable Finance: A Bibliometric Approach. Administrative Sciences, 15(7), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15070270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15070270

Raipure, N., Shukla, M., Dhapodkar, B., Borkar, L., and Sahastrabuddhe, S. (2025, May). Analysis of Carbon Footprint in Product Lifecycle. International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, 14(1), 5–8.

Talukder, S. C., Lakner, Z., and Temesi, Á. (2025). Exploring the Research Landscape of Impact Investing and Sustainable Finance: A Bibliometric Review. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(10), 578. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18100578

Yang, K., Zhang, T., and Ye, C. (2024). The Sustainability of Corporate ESG Performance: An Empirical Study. Sustainability, 16(6), 2377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062377

Zhou, R., Lou, J., and He, B. (2025). Greening Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Impact of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot Policy on Listed Companies. Sustainability, 17, 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030963

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Negi, P., & Srivastava, D. M. (2026). SUSTAINABILITY, ETHICAL CAPITAL, AND INVESTMENT BEHAVIOUR: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM ESG MUTUAL FUND PREFERENCES IN CULTURAL AND CREATIVE INDUSTRIES. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 7(1s), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2026.7194