DIGITAL BODIES AND SOCIAL PROTECTION: VISUAL CULTURE, GENDERED CYBER THREATS, AND POLICING NARRATIVES AMONG UNIVERSITY YOUTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2026.7191Keywords:
Gendered Cyber Threats, University Youth, Social Protection, Cyber Harassment, Visual Mediation, Policing Narratives, Digital Vulnerability, Youth Agency, Online SafetyAbstract [English]
The blistering development of digital spaces of visual media has transformed the experience and presentations of bodies, identities, and vulnerabilities on the Internet, especially through young people in universities. This paper focuses on analyzing the gendered cyber threats against women in light of visual culture and social protection, which concerns the perception and formation of policing narratives in online space. Based on the answers of Gen Z female university students, the study examines the experience of cybercrimes against women, its perception, and visualization in the social media, online platforms, and mediated discourse. The paper makes cyber harassment a part of modern visual culture in which images, acts of subjectivity and the relationship in the Internet help produce vulnerability and resistance. It also examines how the law enforcement is depicted in digital discourse, identifying the disjunction between protection mechanisms carried out by the institutions and how the youth understand safety. The integration of visual studies, gender studies, and cultural analysis perspectives will give the research a step forward to predict the nature of cybercrime visually by performatively, as well as in representational aspects. The results indicate that visual stories have a strong impact on awareness, reporting behavior, and trust in the policing structures. The present research is an addition to an emerging framework of literature on digital bodies and social protection by providing information about the utilization of visual culture with the help of preventive measures, awareness-raising activities and creative interventions to tackle gendered cyber threats in the current youth cultures.
References
Angrish, K., Oshana, D., and Gammage, K. L. (2024). Flex Friday: A Content Analysis of Men’s Fitspiration on Instagram. Body Image, 48, Article 101651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101651
Bhandari, A., and Bimo, S. (2020). TikTok and the “Algorithmized Self”: A New Model of Online Interaction. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11172
Biradar, D. M., Shaikh, T., and Upadhyay, D. (2025). Deepfake Detection Using Deep Learning. International Journal of Recent Advances in Engineering and Technology, 14(2s), 66–69.
Bucher, T., and Helmond, A. (2017). The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In J. Burgess, A. Marwick, and T. Poell (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Media (233–253). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n14
Evans, A., and Ringrose, J. (2024). More-Than-Human, More-Than-Digital: Postdigital Intimacies as a Theoretical Framework for Intimate Therapeutics and Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence. Social Media and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251317779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251317779
Goodyear, V., Andersson, J., Quennerstedt, M., and Varea, V. (2021). #Skinny Girls: Young Girls’ Learning Processes and Health-Related Social Media. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 14, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2021.1888152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2021.1888152
Ringrose, J., Milne, B., Mishna, F., Regehr, K., and Slane, A. (2022). Young People's Experiences of Image-Based Sexual Harassment and Abuse in England and Canada: Toward a Feminist Framing of Technologically Facilitated Sexual Violence. Women’s Studies International Forum, 93, Article 102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102615
Schellewald, A. (2023). Understanding the Popularity and Affordances of TikTok through User Experiences. Media, Culture and Society, 45, 1568–1582. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221144562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221144562
Seguin, D., Kuenzel, E., Morton, J. B., and Duerden, E. G. (2021). School’s out: Parenting Stress and Screen Time Use in School-Age Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders Reports, 6, Article 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100217
Sheth, A., Shalin, V. L., and Kursuncu, U. (2022). Defining and Detecting Toxicity on Social Media: Context and Knowledge are Key. Neurocomputing, 490, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.095
Whitehead, S., and Ringrose, J. (2021). Memetic Masculinities: Exploring Racialized Homosociality and Networked Misogynoir in Teen Boys’ Instagram Social Media Diaries. In F. Blaikie (Ed.), Global Perspectives on Youth and Young Adults: Situated, Embodied and Performed Ways of Being, Engaging and Belonging ( 99–121). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003055822-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003055822-8
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eram Rizvi, Dr. Kaushik Mishra, Dr. Aparna Vajpayee, Ankit Kumar, Dr. Vishal Sharma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























