FROM CONTEXTUAL NEED TO DESIGN SOLUTION: A NOVEL CHAIR DESIGN FOR INDIAN DESIGN STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i2s.2026.7164Keywords:
Chair Design, Design Students, Indian Cross-Legged, Multipurpose Chair, PālathīAbstract [English]
In many Eastern cultures (like India), floor sitting, particularly in postural instances like Indian cross-legged position (locally known as pālathī), has been deeply rooted in daily life. However, as global lifestyles evolve and the influence of Western furniture design spreads, there has been an increasing shift towards the use of chairs. This transition has created a unique challenge in designing seating that accommodates both traditional floor-based postures and modern chair-based postures. However, current seating options generally cater to either elevated sitting or ground-based activities but rarely offer a solution that seamlessly integrates both. This gap is particularly evident in environments such as design classrooms, where versatile seating is crucial. This study reinforces the discussed gap by investigating the literature, market, patents, and through an observational study among design classrooms. Further, A novel chair design is conceptualized for the design students in the Indian context which facilitates conventional sitting as well as Indian cross-legged sitting postures, while allowing multiple seating options like- stool, floor seating, elevated seating along with features like- storage and carry on. The proposed chair is also analyzed using Ansys software for structural robustness under various load tests. Thus, the new design with several benefits and advantages, holds immense potential for introduction in the design classrooms and studios. The solution is also scalable to offices which are now encouraging employee-centric seating preferences; and within household contexts with remote work culture on the rise.
References
Banerjee, S., Goel, K. M., Chakrabarti, D., and Das, A. (2005). An Approach to Specify Informal Sitting in Classroom. Humanizing Work and Work Environment (HWWE). Guwahati.
Brodeur, C. C. (2005). United States Patent No. US7628455B2.
Dutta, S., and Dhara, P. C. (2012). Evaluation of Different Sitting Postures of Rural Primary School Boys in the Classroom. Journal of Ergonomics, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7556.1000105
Edelson, N. (1990). United States Patent No. US5029350A.
Fahrni, W. H. (1975). Conservative Treatment of Lumbar Disc Degenration. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 6, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898%2820%2931204-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31204-9
Goonetilleke, R. S. (1998). Designing to Minimize Discomfort. Ergonomics in Design, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/106480469800600304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106480469800600304
Gurr, K., Straker, L., and Moore, P. (1998). Cultural Hazards in the Transfer of Ergonomics Technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 22, 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141%2897%2900094-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(97)00094-2
Kohli, P., Patel, P., Waybase, H., Gore, S., and Nadkarni, S. (2019). The Value of Cross Legged Sitting: Virtue or Vice for Health. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 607–610. https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i3k.1596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i3k.1596
Kullmann, C. (2020). The Monobloc Chair: Democratising the Practice of Sitting. International Research Journal of Furniture and Designed Objects, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.17811/rm.9.11.2020.1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17811/rm.9.11.2020.1-18
Mallampalli, K. C., and Karmakar, S. (2025). Ergonomic Design Interventions to Minimize Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Female Workers in Cashew Kernel Separating Activity: A Participatory Approach. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2025.2493817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2025.2493817
Matthews, J. P. (2009). United States Patent No. US8616651B2.
McClintock, D. C. (2017). United States Patent No. US20190082848A1.
Muktibodhananda, S. (2006). Hath Yoga Pradipika. Yoga Publications Trust.
Mulholland, S. J., and Wyss, U. P. (2001). Activities of Daily Living in Non-Western Cultures: Range of Motion Requirements for Hip and Knee Joint Implants. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 24(3), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200109000-00004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200109000-00004
NPTEL. (2013). Anthropometry: Squatting and Cross-Legged Postures [Video]. YouTube.
Nagrajan, A., and Dsouza, S. A. (2017). Using the Newly Developed Floor-Sitting Movement Analysis Proforma to Study the Effect of Age and Activity on Floor-Sitting in Indian Adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-016-9310-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-016-9310-4
Noro, K., Lueder, R., Yamada, S., Fujimaki, G., Oyama, H., and Hashidate, Y. (2006). Revisiting Sitting Cross-Cultural Aspects of Seating. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, 814–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000704
Salazar, N. M. (2021). United States Patent No. US20220354263A1.
Saraswati, S. N. (1992). Gheranda Samhita. Yoga Publication Trust.
Srivastava, A., Kumar, A., and Atreya, S. (2025). Crossed Sitting, Straight Insights: Pālathī (Cross-Legged) Posture in Design Education. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Research into Design (ICoRD 2025) (99–110). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5507-6_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-5507-6_9
Srivastava, A., Kumar, S., and Atreya, S. (2026). Assessing the Musculoskeletal Discomfort of Students Practicing Cross-Legged Sitting Postures at Gurukuls. HWWE ACED BRICS 2023. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4186-4_37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4186-4_37
Srivastava, A., Paul, N., and Atreya, S. (2024). Musculoskeletal Health of (Industrial) Design Students and Their Perspectives on Seating: A Pilot Study. In A. Sharma and R. Poovaiah (Eds.), Futuring Design Education 2024 (Vol. 2, 19–28). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9210-8_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9210-8_2
Swanson, G. (2020). Educating the Designer of 2025. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.01.001
Towle, P. E. (2021). United States Patent No. US12004659B2.
Wortman, A. (1993). United States Patent No. US5374109A.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abhishek Srivastava, Nandadeep Paul, Sonal Atreya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
