PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR DANCE COMPETITION JUDGING

Authors

  • Shikha Verma Kashyap Professor, AAFT University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh-492001, India
  • Kirti Gupta Professor, Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship Development, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India
  • Anitha M Assistant Professor, Meenakshi College of Arts and Science, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600093, India
  • Subhash Kumar Verma Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, Greater Noida, 203201, India
  • Priyanka Shashikant Kshirsagar Department of Chemical Engineering, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037, India
  • Sarika Ghamforia Department of Civil Engineering, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Professional Management and Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2026.7090

Keywords:

Dance Competition Judging, Multimodal Performance Analysis, Predictive Modeling, Temporal Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Decision Support Systems

Abstract [English]

Judging dance competitions is dependent on the subjective judgment of highly multimodal dances, which is very likely to be subjective and unequal. The paper will present a predictive modeling architecture of dance competition judging based on the multimodal performance analytics and decision support algorithms built on machine learning. The representation of dance performances with synchronized visual movement, audio rhythm, and spatial trajectory properties is supervised learning ECs, which are recorded in criterion-wise and aggregate scores of judges. Various predictive methods, such as gradient boosted decision trees, recurrent and convolutional temporal modeling, and transformer-based models are reviewed within either regression- or ranking-based formulation. The experimental findings indicate that learning based models significantly enhance the accuracy of score prediction and ranking alignment than a linear baseline with deep temporal models performing optimally. Moreover, inter-judge consistency test proves that model-assisted judging can decrease the variations of scores and increase the stability of the evaluation. The suggested framework puts AI into a status of a human-in-the-loop analytical instrument that facilitates justice, openness, and uniformity of competitive dance judging settings.

References

Chen, W. (2022). Intelligent Music Teaching System Based on Virtual Reality. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 7832306. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7832306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7832306

Choi, M. (2023). AI-Based Music Creation Class. Korean Journal of Research in Music Education, 52, 211–237. https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.52.4.211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30775/KMES.52.4.211

Cui, K. (2023). AI and Creativity in Piano Teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7017–7028. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2059520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2059520

Giraldo, S., et al. (2018, May). Automatic Assessment of Violin Performance. In Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Izmir, Turkey. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2018.8404556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SIU.2018.8404556

Gaikwad, R. R., and Damodaran, D. (2024). The Rise of Predictive Analytics in Management Accounting: From Descriptive to Prescriptive. ShodhAI: Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v1.i1.2024.54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v1.i1.2024.54

Luo. (2022, August). AI and VR in Online Course Education. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computer Applications (AEECA), Dalian, China.

Miao, F., and Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.

Murtaza, M., et al. (2022). AI-Based Personalized E-Learning Systems. IEEE Access, 10, 81323–81342. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938

Olea, C., et al. (2024, June). Evaluating Persona Prompting. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (AIS), Sydney, Australia.

Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Son, J., Ružić, B., and Philpott, A. (2023). AI Technologies for Language Learning. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning.

Wang, Q. (2021, January). Multi-Intelligence Music Classroom Using Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM), Xiamen, China.

Xu, B. (2024, April). Music Intelligent Education System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Computing and Electrical Circuits and Electronics (ICDCECE), Ballari, India.

Zhang, L. (2023). Fusion Artificial Intelligence Technology in Music Education. Journal of Electrical Systems, 19(2), 178–195. https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/jes.631

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Kashyap, S. V., Gupta, K., Anitha M, Verma, S. K., Kshirsagar, P. S., & Ghamforia, S. (2026). PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR DANCE COMPETITION JUDGING. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 7(1s), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2026.7090