AI-GENERATED LEARNING RESOURCES FOR CREATIVE FIELDS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2025.7080Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence in Education, Generative AI, Creative Learning Resources, Personalized Learning, Multimodal Content Generation, Creative PedagogyAbstract [English]
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, the production and distribution of educational material have changed, especially in such creative industries as art, design, music, media, and architecture. The paper explores how AI-generated learning tools can be used to improve creative education through offering adaptive, multimodal, and personalized teaching resources. In contrast to more conventional tools of a static nature, generative AI systems have the capability to create tutorials, design prompts, visual exemplars, musical exercises, and reflective critiques in a dynamic fashion based on the profile of a specific learner. The article can be seen to provide a well-developed conceptual framework based on the advances in artificial intelligence in education, generative models, and creativity-support tools to describe how AI may support the development of technical skills as well as creative exploration. A system architecture that is modular is suggested, which includes creative knowledge repositories, model training/fine-tuning pipelines, and personalization mechanisms that occur based on the learner behavior and performance data. The methodology specifies the combination of quantitative measures of learning effectiveness and creativity with the qualitative user studies with the involvement of students and educators associated with various creative fields. The need to compare results shows that the engagement, conceptual knowledge, and efficiency of practice have increased and can be measured when AI-generated resources are used in addition to traditional teaching resources. Nevertheless, it is also possible to note that the study critically analyzes such issues as the alignment of the pedagogy, its quality assurance, the cultural bias, and the threat of over-reliance on the auto-generation of the content.
References
Alzubi, A. A. F., Nazim, M., and Alyami, N. (2025). Do AI-Generative Tools Kill or Nurture Creativity in EFL Teaching and Learning? Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15147–15184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13409-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13409-8
Caporusso, N. (2023). Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Emergence of Creative Displacement Anxiety: A Review. Research in Psychology and Behavior, 3, Article 10795. https://doi.org/10.53520/rdpb2023.10795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53520/rdpb2023.10795
Chahal, J., Dagar, V., and Shoukat, M. H. (2025). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Examining Stimulus–Organism–Response to the Nexus of Environment, Education, and Motivation. Management Decision, 63(6), 1391–1416. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2024-0845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2024-0845
Chandrasekera, T., Hosseini, Z., and Perera, U. (2025). Can Artificial Intelligence Support Creativity in Early Design Processes? International Journal of Architectural Computing, 23(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771241254637 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771241254637
Chi, Y. N., Chi, O., & Ngo, C. (2025). Exploring Public Views on Oceanic and Shoreline Ecosystem Threats Through Machine Learning. ShodhAI: Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 2(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v2.i1.2025.27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhai.v2.i1.2025.27
Chen, L. (2025). Unlocking the beat: How AI Tools Drive Music Students’ Motivation, Engagement, Creativity, and Learning Success. European Journal of Education, 60, Article e12823. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12823
Cheng, Y.-M. (2023). How Different Categories of Gamified Stimuli Affect Massive Open Online Courses Continuance Intention and Learning Performance? Mediating Roles of Internal Experiences. Social Science Computer Review, 41(2), 495–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221111928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221111928
Cheng, Y.-M. (2024). What Makes Learners Enhance Learning Outcomes in MOOCs? Exploring the Roles of Gamification and Personalization. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2023-0097
Epstein, Z., and Hertzmann, A. (2023). The Investigators of Human Creativity: Art and the Science of Generative AI. Science, 380(6650), 1110–1111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh4451
Gasaymeh, A.-M. M., Beirat, M. A., and Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024). University Students’ Insights of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Writing Tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), Article 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101062
Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., and Thorne, E. (2024). How Does Generative Artificial Intelligence Impact Student Creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34, Article 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072
Hazzan-Bishara, A., Kol, O., and Levy, S. (2025). The Factors Affecting Teachers’ Adoption of AI Technologies: A Unified Model of External and Internal Determinants. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 15043–15069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z
Hsiao, C.-H., and Tang, K.-Y. (2025). Beyond Acceptance: An Empirical Investigation of Technological, Ethical, Social, and Individual Determinants of GenAI-Supported Learning in Higher Education. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 10725–10750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13263-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13263-0
Kanont, K., Pingmuang, P., Simasathien, T., Wisnuwong, S., Wiwatsiripong, B., Poonpirome, K., Songkram, N., and Khlaisang, J. (2024). Generative AI, a Learning Assistant? Factors Influencing Higher Education Students’ Technology Acceptance. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 22(6), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.6.3196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.22.6.3196
Kim, M., Kim, J., Knotts, T. L., and Albers, N. D. (2025). AI for Academic Success: Investigating the Role of Usability, Enjoyment, and Responsiveness in ChatGPT Adoption. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 14393–14414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13398-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13398-8
Oc, Y., Gonsalves, C., and Quamina, L. T. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education Assessments: Examining Risk and Tech-Savviness on Students’ Adoption. Journal of Marketing Education, 47(2), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241302459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02734753241302459
Tsidylo, I. M., and Chele, E. S. (2023). Artificial Intelligence as a Methodological Innovation in the Training of Future Designers: Midjourney Tools. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 97(5), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v97i5.5338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v97i5.5338
Zheng, Y., Chang, C.-H., Huang, S.-H., Chen, P.-Y., and Picek, S. (2024). An Overview of Trustworthy AI: Advances in IP Protection, Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning, Security Verification, and GAI Safety Alignment. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 14(4), 582–607. https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2024.3477348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2024.3477348
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Kunal Dhaku Jadhav, Ananta Narayana, Leena Bharat Chaudhari, Monisha J., Vishal Ambhore, Ganesh Chandrabhan Shelke
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
