AUTOMATED EDITING TOOLS FOR MEDIA STUDENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Authors

  • Dr. Ragini Kunal Jadhav Assistant Professor, Prin. L. N. Welingkar Institute of Management Development and Research, PGDM, India
  • Shalini E Assistant Professor, Meenakshi College of Arts and Science, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai 600078, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Mahesh Kurulekar Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune 411037, Maharashtra, India
  • Pooja Goel Associate Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, Greater Noida 203201, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Urvashi Bhat Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Dr. Manisha Upadhyay Assistant Professor, Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, Mangalayatan University, Aligarh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2026.7075

Keywords:

Automated Editing, Media Education, AI-Assisted Creativity, Human–AI Collaboration, Creative Automation

Abstract [English]

Purpose: To assess automated editing tools applied in the media education on the basis of technical and pedagogical terms.
Methodology: Four categories of automated editing tools were evaluated based on a multi-dimensional model based on the level of automation, usability, creative control, pedagogical compatibility, and workflow efficiency. A student case study based on tasks was added to quantitative scoring.
Results: The results show that high automation is more efficient and accessible, yet less creative transparency and conceptual comprehension. Equipment with balanced automation has better learning results.
Implications: The study suggest that an automated editing tool should be integrated in the media education stages on the basis of a blended approach, depending on the stage.
Originality: The article offers a comparative educational theory of evaluating AI-assisted editing tools.

References

Alier, M., Camba, J., and García‑Peñalvo, F. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: From Deceptive to Disruptive. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.011

Almassaad, A., Alajlan, H., and Alebaikan, R. (2024). Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Investigating Utilization, Benefits, and Challenges in Higher Education. Systems, 12(10), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12100385

Almulla, M. A. (2023). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Students' Critical Thinking, Creativity, and Problem Solving to Affect Academic Performance in Higher Education. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2172929. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2172929

Al‑Zahrani, A. M. (2024). Unveiling the Shadows: Beyond the Hype of AI in Education. Heliyon, 10, e30696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30696

Brako, D. K., and Mensah, A. K. (2023). Robots Over Humans? The Place of Artificial Intelligence in the Pedagogy of Art Direction in Film Education. Emerging Technologies, 3(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.57040/jet.v3i2.484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57040/jet.v3i2.484

Bulut, O., Cutumisu, M., and Yilmaz, M. (2024). Ethical Challenges in AI‑Based Educational Measurement (arXiv:2406.18900). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18900

Chaudhry, A., Wolf, J., and Gervasio, M. (2022). A Transparency Index for AI in Education (arXiv:2206.03220). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.03220

Chinta, R., Qazi, M., and Raza, M. (2024). FairAIED: A Review of Fairness, Accountability, and Bias in Educational AI systems (arXiv:2407.18745). arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18745

Deng, R., Yang, Y., and Shen, S. (2024). Impact of Question Presence and Interactivity in Instructional Videos on Student Learning. Education and Information Technologies, 1-29.

Desai, T. S., and Kulkarni, D. C. (2022). Assessment of Interactive Video to Enhance Learning Experience: A Case Study. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 35(1), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22011

Gouseti, A., James, F., Fallin, L., and Burden, K. (2024). The Ethics of Using AI in K-12 Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 161-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601

Licht, F. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Why the "Banning Approach" to Student use is Sometimes Morally Justified. Philosophy & Technology, 37(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00799-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00799-9

Luan, H., et al. (2020). Challenges and Future Directions of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 580820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.580820

Matsiola, M., Spiliopoulos, P., and Tsigilis, N. (2022). Digital Storytelling in Sports Narrations: Employing Audiovisual tools in Sport Journalism Higher Education Course. Education Sciences, 12(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010051

Munro, R. (2023). Co‑Creating Film Education: Moments of Divergence and Convergence on Queen Margaret University's Introduction to Film Education Course. Film Education Journal, 6(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.06.1.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/FEJ.06.1.04

O'Connor. (2022). Constructivism, Curriculum and the Knowledge Question: Tensions and Challenges for Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 412-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1750585

Pawlaszczyk, D., Engler, P., Bodach, R., Michel, M., and Zimmermann, R. (2025). Automated Data Population for Ios Devices with Autopodmobile. Journal of Digital Security and Forensics, 2(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.29121/digisecforensics.v2.i1.2025.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29121/digisecforensics.v2.i1.2025.46

Susanti, A., Suyatna, A., and Herlina, K. (2023). Development of H5P Moodle‑Based Interactive STEM‑loaded Videos to Grow Performance Skills as an Effort to Overcome Learning Loss in Electrical Measuring Materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(4), 6974-6984. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3546

Tiernan, P., Costello, E., Donlon, E., Parysz, M., and Scriney, M. (2023). Information and Media Literacy in the Age of AI: Options for the future. Education Sciences, 13(9), 906. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090906

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., and Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies and Practices: Digital Technologies and Distance Education During the Coronavirus Emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

Zhai. (2024). AI‑Generated Content and its Impact on Student Learning and Critical Thinking: A Pedagogical Reflection. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 12.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Jadhav, R. K., Shalini E, Kurulekar, M., Goel, P., Bhat, U., & Upadhyay, M. (2026). AUTOMATED EDITING TOOLS FOR MEDIA STUDENTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 7(1s), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i1s.2026.7075