CINEMATIC ACTS OF RESISTANCE: FEMINIST RE-IMAGININGS OF CARE WORK IN GULZAR'S AANDHI AND IJAAZAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i2s.2026.7030Keywords:
Feminist Film Theory, Emotional Labour, Care Labour, South Asian Cinema, GulzarAbstract [English]
This paper conducts a scene-by-scene qualitative study of two films by Gulzar, Aandhi (1975) and Ijaazat (1987), and explores the transformation of the emotional and care labour of women into patriarchal resistance acts. Based on feminist film theory (Mulvey and Smelik) and emotional labour framework by Hochschild, this paper discusses how the characters, Aarti Devi and Sudha, utilise caregiving, silence, presence and withdrawal to assert their agency in environments which devalue the emotional and relational labour of women.
The findings of the close textual analysis and coding of themes testify that care work in these films is not blind obedience but deliberate feminist actions. The two characters convert domestic and emotional labour to self-preservation and dignity as they negotiate their visibility and withdrawal as means of managing patriarchal control and male gaze. The paper also demonstrates how the use of emotional labour can be politically significant when executed consciously and reflectively so that apparently accommodative gestures can serve as instances of ethical and narrative power. By extending Mulvey's concept of the gaze beyond scopophilia and Hochschild's emotional labour theory within South Asian cinematic contexts, this research positions care and emotional labour as culturally specific forms of feminist agency. Thus, it contributes to transnational feminist film studies by foregrounding "quiet feminism" as an important form of resistance beyond Western models that privilege vocal or spectacular opposition.
References
Ali, R., Naz, A., and Azhar, M. (2025). Work-Life Balance, Career Motivation and Women: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda in the Indian Context. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 40(3), 467–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-01-2024-0022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-01-2024-0022
Askins, K., and Blazek, M. (2016). Feeling Our Way: Academia, Emotions and a Politics of Care. Social and Cultural Geography, 18(8), 1086–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1240224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2016.1240224
Bashir, S. (2019). Gulzar’s Aandhi. HarperCollins India.
Biltereyst, D., and Meers, P. (2016). New Cinema History and the Comparative Mode. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 11, 13–32. https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.11.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.11.01
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Capalbi, A., Fabbri, T., and Iervese, V. (2021). New Digital Cinema: How Platforms are Changing the Audiovisual Industry. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio, 8(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.2478/auscom-2021-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/auscom-2021-0002
Chakravarti, U. (2018). Gendering Caste: Through a Feminist Lens. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353287818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789353287818
Chamola, D. (2019). India of the 1970s and Gulzar’s Construction of Gender: Aandhi as a Case for Indian Women. Media Watch, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2019/v10i3/49689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15655/mw/2019/v10i3/49689
Chaudhuri, S. (2005). Contemporary World Cinema: Europe, the Middle East, East Asia, and South Asia. Edinburgh University Press.
Creswell, J. W., and Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deblasio, L. (2022). Using Reflexivity as a Tool to Validate Feminist Research Based on Personal Trauma. Sociological Research Online, 27(3), 645–661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-022-09487-5
Dudrah, R. (2012). Bollywood travels: Culture, Diaspora and Border Crossings in Popular Hindi Cinema. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203125649
Duffy, M. (2005). Reproducing Labor Inequalities: Challenges for Feminists Conceptualizing Care at the Intersections of Gender, Race, and Class. Gender and Society, 19(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204269499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204269499
Folbre, N. (2001). The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. The New Press.
Gilligan, C. (2014). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.
Gopal, S., and Moorti, S. (Eds.). (2008). Global Bollywood: Travels of Hindi Song and Dance. University of Minnesota Press.
Graham, H. (1991). The Concept of Caring in Feminist Research: The Case of Domestic Service. Sociology, 25(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038591025001004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038591025001004
Gulzar. (Director). (1975). Aandhi [Film]. Filmyug Pvt. Ltd.
Gulzar. (Director). (1987). Ijaazat [Film]. Vaishno Films Pvt. Ltd.
Gürkan, H. (2015). Feminist Cinema as Counter-Cinema: Is Feminist Cinema Counter-Cinema? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 5(3), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/2517
Hashmi, S. (2019). Gulzar’s Ijaazat. HarperCollins India.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press.
James, N. (1989). Emotional Labour: Skill and Work in the Social Regulation of Feelings. The Sociological Review, 37(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1989.tb00019.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1989.tb00019.x
Johnston, C. (1973). Women’s Cinema as Counter-Cinema. In C. Johnston (Ed.), Notes on Women’s Cinema (24–31). Society for Education in Film and Television. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474473224-005
Kishwar, M., and Vanita, R. (1987). The Labouring Woman in Hindi Films. Manushi: A Journal About Women and Society, (42–43), 62–76.
Krishna, N. R., and Sivakumar, P. (2024). Reproducing Home as a Space of Labour: The Great Indian Kitchen and Jaya Jaya Jaya Jaya Hai. Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 26, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.26.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33178/alpha.26.04
Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Mannil, B. M. (2020). The Gendered Film Worker: Women in Cinema Collective, Intimate Publics, and the Politics of Labour. Studies in South Asian Film and Media, 12(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1386/safm_00028_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/safm_00028_1
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
Mulvey, L. (2004). Looking at the Past from the Present: Rethinking Feminist Film Theory of the 1970s. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(1), 1286–1292. https://doi.org/10.1086/421883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/421883
Nagarajan, U., Lukose, R. A., and Mannur, A. (2023). Gender, Domesticity, and Feminism in The Great Indian Kitchen. Verge: Studies in Global Asias, 9(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1353/vrg.2023.a903021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/vrg.2023.a903021
Oakley, A. (1974). The Sociology of Housework. Martin Robertson.
Olmos-Vega, F. M., Stalmeijer, R. E., Varpio, L., and Kahlke, R. (2018). A Practical Guide to Reflexivity in Qualitative Research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 40(11), 1082–1090.
Phadke, S., Khan, S., and Ranade, S. (2011). Why Loiter? Women and Risk on Mumbai Streets. Penguin Books India.
Singh, J., Pathak, S., and Mishra, S. (2025). From Compliance to Defiance: Review of the Film Mrs. (2024). (Unpublished Manuscript).
Smelik, A. (1999). Feminist Film Theory. In P. Cook and M. Bernink (Eds.), The Cinema Book (2nd ed., 491–502). British Film Institute.
Steinberg, R. J., and Figart, D. M. (1999). Emotional Labour Since The Managed Heart. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561(1), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956100101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716299561001001
Subramani, S. (2019). Practising Reflexivity: Ethics, Methodology and Theory Construction. Methodological Innovations, 12(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119863276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799119863276
Surwati, C. H. D., Nurhaeni, I. D. A., Utari, P., and Hastjarjo, S. (2025). Temporal Trends in Feminist Film Scholarship: A Bibliometric Study of the Female Gaze (1987–2026). Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 8(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.08.02.576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.08.02.576
Tharu, S., and Lalita, K. (Eds.). (1993). Women Writing in India: 600 B.C. to the Present (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.
Tharu, S., and Niranjana, T. (1994). Problems for a Contemporary Theory of Gender. Social Scientist, 22(3–4), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/3517624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3517624
United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human Development Report 2023–24: Breaking the Gridlock—Reimagining Cooperation in a Polarised World. UNDP. http://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24
Vasudevan, R. S. (2000). Making Meaning in Indian Cinema. Oxford University Press.
Varghese, D., and Ranganathan, S. (2021). Juxtaposing The Great Indian Kitchen and the Kudumbashree: Women, Work and Agency in Kerala. Indian Journal of Human Development, 15(2), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/09737030211035863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09737030211035863
Velaskar, P. (2016). Gendering the Public Sphere: A Critique of Habermasian Theory from India. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(6), 43–51.
Virdi, J. (2003). The cinematic imagination: Indian Popular Films as Social History. Rutgers University Press.
Walsh, S. (2003). Individual Reflexivity and the Structure of Qualitative Data Analysis. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 315–334.
Xu, H., Wu, L., Zhang, Z., and Wang, C.-J. (2019). The Cinderella Complex: Word Embeddings Reveal Gender Stereotypes in Movies and Books. PLOS ONE, 14(11), e0225385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225385
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Niharika Bhowmik, Pradeep Mallik, Sandesh Mahajan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























