MEASURING CREATIVITY IN CONTEMPORARY ART VIA AI MODELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6923Keywords:
Creativity Measurement, Contemporary Art, Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Learning, Art AnalyticsAbstract [English]
The process of measuring creativity in modern art has mostly been based on subjective expert opinion, cultural background and qualitative interpretations, which although they may be valuable, are usually not scalable, consistent and repeatable. As digital art practices and art datasets continue to expand at a very high rate, there is an increasing demand to have computational systems that can enable the systematic evaluation of the features of creativity without compromising artistic subtleties. In the present paper, the author suggests an AI-enabled creativity measurement framework which is a combination of computer vision, natural language processing, and multimodal learning to measure creativity in modern artworks. The framework conceptualizes creativity as a multidimensional construct that entails visual novelty, stylistic deviance, conceptual richness, narrative novelty and contextual topicality. Deep convolutional and transformer-based vision models are used to extract features of visual analysis that include color harmony, compositional complexity, variation of texture and deviation of style. The conceptual and semantic levels are represented by the use of NLP models on the texts of artists, exhibition, and critical descriptions, which allows analyzing originality, metaphor density, and coherence of the theme. Multimodal visionlanguage models also match a visual and textual representation to generate an overall creativity score, one that is holistic that captures the perceptual as well as interpretative elements of art. The suggested approach is compared to the baseline statistical and single-modality models in terms of the quantitative indicators of novelty indices, semantic divergence scores, cross-modal coherence, and accuracy in the classification of creativity.
References
Borji, A. (2023). Generated Faces in the Wild: Quantitative Comparison of Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and DALL·E 2 [Preprint]. arXiv.
Cheng, M. (2022). The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in art. Proceedings, 81, Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110
Giannini, T., and Bowen, J. P. (2023). Generative Art and Computational Imagination: Integrating Poetry and Art. In Proceedings of EVA London 2023 (211–219). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.37
Guo, D. H., Chen, H. X., Wu, R. L., and Wang, Y. G. (2023). AIGC Challenges and Opportunities Related to Public Safety: A Case Study of ChatGPT. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 4(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001
Horton, C. B., Jr., White, M. W., and Iyengar, S. S. (2023). Bias Against AI Art can Enhance Perceptions of Human Creativity. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 19001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3
Kannen, N., Ahmad, A., Andreetto, M., Prabhakaran, V., Prabhu, U., Dieng, A. B., and Bhattacharyya, P. (2024). Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Models [Preprint]. arXiv.
Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). AI on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Detection. ASM Science Journal, 20, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918
Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). Ethical Design of AI for Education and Learning Systems. ASM Science Journal, 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917
Liu, B., Wang, L., Lyu, C., Zhang, Y., Su, J., and Shi, S. (2024). On the Cultural Gap in Text-to-Image Generation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 392, 930–937. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240581
Lou, Y. Q. (2023). Human Creativity in the AIGC Era. Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, 9(4), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002
Marcus, G., Davis, E., and Aaronson, S. (2022). A Very Preliminary Analysis of DALL·E 2 [Preprint]. arXiv.
Rhem, J. A. (2023). Ethical use of Data in AI Applications. IntechOpen.
Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B. (2022). High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) ( 10684–10695). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042
Santoni de Sio, F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Mapping the Ethical Issues. Journal of Ethics, 28(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-024-09493-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-024-09493-6
Shao, L. J., Chen, B. S., Zhang, Z. Q., Zhang, Z., and Chen, X. R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) in Medicine: A Narrative Review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 21(2), 1672–1711. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073
Wei, M., Feng, Y., Chen, C., Luo, P., Zuo, C., and Meng, L. (2024). Unveiling Public Perception of AI Ethics: An Exploration on Wikipedia Data. EPJ Data Science, 13, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00462-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00462-5
Westermann, C., and Gupta, T. (2023). Turning Queries into Questions: For a Plurality of Perspectives in the Age of AI and Other Frameworks with Limited (mind)Sets. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00106_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00106_2
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ashish Verma, YuvrajSinh Sindha, Rashmi Manhas, R. Elankavi, Saudagar Subhash Barde, Dr. Kunal Meher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























