MEASURING CREATIVITY IN CONTEMPORARY ART VIA AI MODELS

Authors

  • Ashish Verma Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India
  • YuvrajSinh Sindha Assistant Professor, Department of Interior Design, Parul Institute of Design, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Rashmi Manhas Assistant Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, India
  • R. Elankavi Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Tamil Nadu, India
  • Saudagar Subhash Barde Department of Information Technology, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune 411037, Maharashtra, India
  • Dr. Kunal Meher Assistant Professor, UGDX School of Technology, ATLAS Skill Tech University, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6923

Keywords:

Creativity Measurement, Contemporary Art, Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Learning, Art Analytics

Abstract [English]

The process of measuring creativity in modern art has mostly been based on subjective expert opinion, cultural background and qualitative interpretations, which although they may be valuable, are usually not scalable, consistent and repeatable. As digital art practices and art datasets continue to expand at a very high rate, there is an increasing demand to have computational systems that can enable the systematic evaluation of the features of creativity without compromising artistic subtleties. In the present paper, the author suggests an AI-enabled creativity measurement framework which is a combination of computer vision, natural language processing, and multimodal learning to measure creativity in modern artworks. The framework conceptualizes creativity as a multidimensional construct that entails visual novelty, stylistic deviance, conceptual richness, narrative novelty and contextual topicality. Deep convolutional and transformer-based vision models are used to extract features of visual analysis that include color harmony, compositional complexity, variation of texture and deviation of style. The conceptual and semantic levels are represented by the use of NLP models on the texts of artists, exhibition, and critical descriptions, which allows analyzing originality, metaphor density, and coherence of the theme. Multimodal visionlanguage models also match a visual and textual representation to generate an overall creativity score, one that is holistic that captures the perceptual as well as interpretative elements of art. The suggested approach is compared to the baseline statistical and single-modality models in terms of the quantitative indicators of novelty indices, semantic divergence scores, cross-modal coherence, and accuracy in the classification of creativity.

References

Borji, A. (2023). Generated Faces in the Wild: Quantitative Comparison of Stable Diffusion, Midjourney and DALL·E 2 [Preprint]. arXiv.

Cheng, M. (2022). The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in art. Proceedings, 81, Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110

Giannini, T., and Bowen, J. P. (2023). Generative Art and Computational Imagination: Integrating Poetry and Art. In Proceedings of EVA London 2023 (211–219). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2023.37

Guo, D. H., Chen, H. X., Wu, R. L., and Wang, Y. G. (2023). AIGC Challenges and Opportunities Related to Public Safety: A Case Study of ChatGPT. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 4(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001

Horton, C. B., Jr., White, M. W., and Iyengar, S. S. (2023). Bias Against AI Art can Enhance Perceptions of Human Creativity. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 19001. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3

Kannen, N., Ahmad, A., Andreetto, M., Prabhakaran, V., Prabhu, U., Dieng, A. B., and Bhattacharyya, P. (2024). Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Models [Preprint]. arXiv.

Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). AI on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Detection. ASM Science Journal, 20, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918

Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). Ethical Design of AI for Education and Learning Systems. ASM Science Journal, 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917

Liu, B., Wang, L., Lyu, C., Zhang, Y., Su, J., and Shi, S. (2024). On the Cultural Gap in Text-to-Image Generation. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 392, 930–937. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240581

Lou, Y. Q. (2023). Human Creativity in the AIGC Era. Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, 9(4), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002

Marcus, G., Davis, E., and Aaronson, S. (2022). A Very Preliminary Analysis of DALL·E 2 [Preprint]. arXiv.

Rhem, J. A. (2023). Ethical use of Data in AI Applications. IntechOpen.

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., and Ommer, B. (2022). High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) ( 10684–10695). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042

Santoni de Sio, F. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Mapping the Ethical Issues. Journal of Ethics, 28(4), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-024-09493-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-024-09493-6

Shao, L. J., Chen, B. S., Zhang, Z. Q., Zhang, Z., and Chen, X. R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) in Medicine: A Narrative Review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 21(2), 1672–1711. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073

Wei, M., Feng, Y., Chen, C., Luo, P., Zuo, C., and Meng, L. (2024). Unveiling Public Perception of AI Ethics: An Exploration on Wikipedia Data. EPJ Data Science, 13, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00462-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00462-5

Westermann, C., and Gupta, T. (2023). Turning Queries into Questions: For a Plurality of Perspectives in the Age of AI and Other Frameworks with Limited (mind)Sets. Technoetic Arts: A Journal of Speculative Research, 21(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00106_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00106_2

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Verma, A., Sindha, Y., Manhas, R., R. Elankavi, Barde, S. S., & Meher, K. (2025). MEASURING CREATIVITY IN CONTEMPORARY ART VIA AI MODELS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(5s), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6923