MANAGING CONTEMPORARY ART INSTITUTIONS WITH PREDICTIVE INSIGHTS

Authors

  • Khushboo Assistant Professor, School of Fine Arts and Design, Noida International University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Ramu K Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Tamil Nadu, India
  • M S Pavithra Department of Master of Computer Applications, ATME College of Engineering, Mysuru 570028, Karnataka, India
  • Sathyabalaji Kannan Department of Engineering, Science and Humanities, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune 411037, Maharashtra, India
  • Akhilesh Kalia Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India
  • Shardul Phansalkar Assistant Professor, Department of Product Design, Parul Institute of Design, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6922

Keywords:

Predictive Analytics, Arts Management, Decision Support Systems, Visitor Demand Forecasting, Cultural Institutions, Artificial Intelligence

Abstract [English]

Modern art organizations are becoming more and more active in unstable cultural, economic, and digital conditions that require evidence-based decision making, not based on intuitions and ex-post reporting. This paper suggests a predictive analytics system to be used in strategic and operational management of museums, galleries, and hybrid cultural institutions. Combining nonhomogeneous data flows visitor attendance and mobility traces, engagement and ticketing logs, exhibition performance indicator, sales and acquisition and digital interaction signals of websites, social media, and virtual exhibitions the framework allows making a forward-looking decision regarding programming, finance, and resource allocation. The data preprocessing and harmonization, feature engineering to capture temporal, behavioral, and contextual dynamics, deployment of machine learning and time-series models to predict visitor demand, predict engagement, and estimate revenue are all part of the methodology. Optimization modules convert predictions into actions to be taken by the staff, exhibition schedule, marketing expenditure and collection plans. A case study shows how it is applied in the context of a modern art organization, including the nature of its datasets, deployment of the model and its connection to managerial processes. Quantitative analysis demonstrates the better accuracy of the forecasts in terms of attendance and revenues, the minimization of operational inefficiency, and a more suitable exhibition planning, whereas qualitative reciprocation demonstrates increased managerial confidence and decision processing transparency. According to the results, predictive insights can help to balance artistic vision and sustainable management by balancing cultural impact and financial viability.

References

Abramovich, F., and Pensky, M. (2019). Classification with Many Classes: Challenges and Pluses. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 174, Article 104536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2019.104536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2019.104536

Barath, C.-V., Logeswaran, S., Nelson, A., Devaprasanth, M., and Radhika, P. (2023). AI in Art Restoration: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Case Studies, Challenges, and Future Directions. International Research Journal of Modern Engineering Technology and Science, 5, 16–21.

Cecotti, H. (2022). Cultural Heritage in Fully Immersive Virtual Reality. Virtual Worlds, 1(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds1010006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds1010006

Chang, L. (2021). Review and Prospect of Temperature and Humidity Monitoring for Cultural Property Conservation Environments. Journal of Cultural Heritage Conservation, 55, 47–55.

Dobbs, T., and Ras, Z. W. (2022). On Art Authentication and the Rijksmuseum Challenge: A Residual Neural Network Approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 200, Article 116933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116933

Dobbs, T., Benedict, A., and Ras, Z. W. (2022). Jumping into the Artistic Deep End: Building the Catalogue Raisonné. AI and Society, 37(3), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01370-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01370-2

Kim, S., Park, S. M., Bak, S., Kim, G. H., Kim, C. S., Kim, C. E., and Kim, K. (2021). Advanced Art Authentication in Oil Paintings Using Precise 3D Morphological Analysis of Craquelure Patterns. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-583044/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-583044/v1

Lee, H., Jung, T. H., tom Dieck, M. C., and Chung, N. (2020). Experiencing Immersive Virtual Reality in Museums. Information and Management, 57(5), Article 103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103229

Leonarduzzi, R., Liu, H., and Wang, Y. (2018). Scattering Transform and Sparse Linear Classifiers for Art Authentication. Signal Processing, 150, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.03.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.03.012

Łydżba-Kopczyńska, B. I., and Szwabiński, J. (2022). Attribution Markers and Data Mining in Art Authentication. Molecules, 27(1), Article 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010070

Powell, L., Gelich, A., and Ras, Z. W. (2021). How to Raise Artwork Prices Using Action Rules, Personalization and Artwork Visual Features. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 57(3), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-021-00660-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-021-00660-x

Shi, K., Su, C., and Lu, Y.-B. (2019). Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Necessary Tool for the Future Development of Museums. Science and Technology of Museums, 23, 29–41.

Tennent, P., Martindale, S., Benford, S., Darzentas, D., Brundell, P., and Collishaw, M. (2020). Thresholds: Embedding Virtual Reality in the Museum. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 13(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3369394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3369394

tom Dieck, M. C., and Jung, T. H. (2017). Value of Augmented Reality at Cultural Heritage Sites: A Stakeholder Approach. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 6(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.03.002

Verhulst, I., Woods, A., Whittaker, L., Bennett, J., and Dalton, P. (2021). Do VR and AR Versions of an Immersive Cultural Experience Engender Different user Experiences? Computers in Human Behavior, 125, Article 106951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106951 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106951

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Khushboo, Ramu K, M S Pavithra, Kannan, S., Kalia, A., & Phansalkar, S. (2025). MANAGING CONTEMPORARY ART INSTITUTIONS WITH PREDICTIVE INSIGHTS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(5s), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6922