PREDICTIVE MODELING FOR PRINTING INK CONSUMPTION

Authors

  • K. France Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Tamil Nadu, India
  • Deepak Prasad Assistant Professor, Department of Journalism & Mass Communication, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India
  • Om Prakash Associate Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, India
  • Divya Sharma Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India
  • Nishant Trivedi Assistant Professor, Department of Animation, Parul Institute of Design, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Anuja Abhijit Phadke Department of Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune 411037, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6918

Keywords:

Printing Ink Consumption, Predictive Modeling, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Print Analytics

Abstract [English]

In the current printing industries, precise forecasting of printing ink patterns is the key to cost reduction, inventory control, and environmentally friendly functioning. Conventional methods of estimation are based on coverage assumptions, which are always static and operator experience which frequently results in wastage of ink, delay in production and erratic quality. The paper provides an in-depth predictive modelling platform of ink consumption estimation based on statistical, machine learning, and deep learning methods. The proposed strategy is one that formulates ink usage prediction as a supervised regression, from which the heterogeneous inputs include the type of paper, the area covered, the color density, the print resolution, and the machine configuration parameters. The data is obtained during print job logs and in-built machine sensors and job specification files and past production logs. To increase predictive relevance and robustness, superior pre-processing methods are used, such as feature engineering of color coverage measures, ink density measures, and print complexity measures. The comparison between methods of baseline linear regression and statistical forecasting models and machine learning methods including decision trees, random forest, support vectors regression, and gradient boosting are made. Moreover, the deep learning models such as artificial neural networks, long short-term memory networks, and hybrid architectures are determined to obtain nonlinear relationships and temporal dependencies between printing workflows. Experimental evidence shows that ensemble and deep learning models are much more successful than the classical approaches, with lower error in prediction and overall generalization to a variety of print jobs.

References

Chen, F., and Xiang, Z. (2021). Experimental Analysis of Optimal Solid Ink Density for Secondary Fiber Newsprint. Printing Industry, 5, 55–59.

Fang, Y., Lu, X., and Li, H. (2021). A Random Forest-Based Model for the Prediction of Construction-Stage Carbon Emissions at the Early Design Stage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 328, 129657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129657

Janiesch, C., Zschech, P., and Heinrich, K. (2021). Machine Learning and Deep Learning. Electronic Markets, 31, 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2

Kotenko, I. V., and Saenko, I. B. (2023). Exploring Opportunities to Identify Abnormal Behavior of Data Center Users Based on Machine Learning Models. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 33, 368–372. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661823030227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661823030227

Kuehn, J., Abadie, S., Delpey, M., and Roeber, V. (2024). Super-Resolution on Unstructured Coastal Wave Computations with Graph Neural Networks and Polynomial Regressions. Coastal Engineering, 194, 104619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2024.104619

Kumano, S., and Akutsu, T. (2022). Comparison of the Representational Power of Random Forests, Binary Decision Diagrams, and Neural Networks. Neural Computation, 34, 1019–1044. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01486

Lee, S., and Kim, J. (2020). Prediction of Nanofiltration and Reverse-Osmosis-Membrane Rejection of Organic Compounds Using Random Forest Model. Journal of Environmental Engineering (ASCE), 146, 04020127. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001806 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001806

Li, H., Lin, J., Lei, X., and Wei, T. (2022). Compressive Strength Prediction of Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete Via Random Forest Algorithm. Materials Today Communications, 30, 103117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103117

Pan, M., Xia, B., Huang, W., Ren, Y., and Wang, S. (2024). PM2.5 Concentration Prediction Model Based on Random Forest and SHAP. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 38, 2452012. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001424520128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001424520128

Singh, D., and Singh, B. (2022). Feature-Wise Normalization: An Effective Way of Normalizing Data. Pattern Recognition, 122, 108307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108307

Wang, J., Hou, Z., Chen, Y., Li, G., Kan, G., Xiao, P., Li, Z., Mo, D., and Huang, J. (2025). The Acoustic Attenuation Prediction for Seafloor Sediment Based on In-Situ Data and Machine Learning Methods. Journal of Ocean University of China, 24, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-025-5783-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-025-5783-5

Wu, Y., Chen, J., Lin, C., and Li, Z. (2025). Optimization of Low-Earth Orbit Density Model Based on Support Vector Regression. Advances in Space Research, 75, 3601–3613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.062

Yang, B., Xu, J., Long, H., and Guo, L. (2020). Study on the Matching Relationship Between Minimum Color Difference and Optimal Density in Print. Digital Printing, 147–151.

Yu, C. X., Ying, S., Min, Z. X., and Feng, G. (2022). Research Progress and Trend of the Machine Learning Based on Fusion. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130701 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130701

Zhang, Y., and Li, Z. (2023). RF_Phage Virion: Classification of Phage Virion Proteins with a Random Forest Model. Frontiers in Genetics, 14, 1224665. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1103783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1224665

Zhao, S., Chen, L., and Huang, Y. (2024). ADAS Simulation Result Dataset Processing Based on Improved BP Neural Network. Data, 9, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/data9010011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/data9010011

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

K. France, Prasad, D., Prakash, O., Sharma, D., Trivedi, N., & Phadke, A. A. (2025). PREDICTIVE MODELING FOR PRINTING INK CONSUMPTION. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(5s), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6918