DIGITAL CLAY MODELING WITH AI-ASSISTED FEEDBACK

Authors

  • Tarun Kapoor Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India
  • Neha Assistant Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Subramanian Karthick Department of Computer Engineering, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune 411037, Maharashtra, India
  • Dr. S. Prince Mary Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. Simonthomas Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Kajal Thakuriya Professor, Department of Design, Vivekananda Global University, Jaipur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6899

Keywords:

AI-Assisted Sculpting, Digital Clay Modeling, Geometry-Aware Neural Networks, 3D Shape Analysis, Interactive Feedback Systems, Creative AI Tools

Abstract [English]

Digital clay modeling has become a paradigm shift in sculptural design in that the users are able to work with digital materials in a way never before possible, with control and fluidity never seen. Many conventional digital sculpture has a workflow, however, that does not provide smart feedback, which facilitates refining, aesthetic refinement, and technical precision. In this paper, a proposal of an AI-based digital clay modeling system will be presented, encompassing geometry-sensitive neural networks, multimodal feature detection, and user-AI feedback mechanisms that can be used to strengthen the process of sculptural creation. The 3D mesh, voxel and implicit surface representations are included in the system architecture to enable the feedback engine to assess deformable geometries in real time. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), graph neural networks (GNNs), and implicit models are used to capture structural, topological and stylistic representations that are required to provide accurate feedback. The proposed feedback engine considers three major dimensions: (1) identification of sculpting anomalies including asymmetry, instability, and unintentional deformations; (2) aesthetic guidance based on maximization of proportion, balance, flow of curvature and stylistic consistency; and (3) adaptive guidance according to skill level of the user where the beginner, intermediate, and expert users have the ability to receive context-sensitive guidance. It is evaluated by benchmark 3D modeling datasets and own sequences of clay deformation and it shows better accuracy of anomaly detection and higher modeling fluency.

References

Aldashti, A. A. (2025). How Artificial Intelligence (AI) is Being Utilized in Structural Engineering. International Journal of Novel Research in Engineering and Science, 12, 14–19.

Bucher, M. J. J., Kraus, M. A., Rust, R., and Tang, S. (2023). Performance-Based Generative Design for Parametric Modeling of Engineering Structures Using Deep Conditional Generative Models. Automation in Construction, 156, 105128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105128

Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., and Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital Transformation and Environmental Sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 13, 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530

Gondia, A., Moussa, A., Ezzeldin, M., and El-Dakhakhni, W. (2023). Machine Learning-Based Construction Site Dynamic Risk Models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122347

İnan, T., Narbaev, T., and Hazir, Ö. (2022). A Machine Learning Study to Enhance Project Cost Forecasting. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55, 3286–3291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.10.127

Koya, B. P., Aneja, S., Gupta, R., and Valeo, C. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Different Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Mechanical Properties of Concrete. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 29, 4032–4043. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1917021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1917021

Lagos, C. I., Herrera, R. F., Mac Cawley, A. F., and Alarcón, L. F. (2024). Predicting Construction Schedule Performance with Last Planner System and Machine Learning. Automation in Construction, 167, 105716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105716

Laksmiwati, P. A., Lavicza, Z., Cahyono, A. N., Alagic, M., and Mumcu, F. (2024). When Engineering Design Meets STEAM Education in Hybrid Learning Environment: Teachers’ Innovation Key Through Design Heuristics. Asia-Pacific Journal of Education. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2373226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2373226

Lee, J., Cho, W., Kang, D., and Lee, J. (2023). Simplified Methods for Generative Design that Combine Evaluation Techniques for Automated Conceptual Building Design. Applied Sciences, 13, 12856. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312856

Özeren, Ö., Özeren, E. B., Top, S. M., and Qurraie, B. S. (2023). Learning-By-Doing Using 3D Printers: Digital Fabrication Studio Experience in Architectural Education. Journal of Engineering Research, 11, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100135

Sun, H., Burton, H. V., and Huang, H. (2021). Machine Learning Applications for Building Structural Design and Performance Assessment: State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816

Thai, H. (2022). Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review. Structures, 38, 448–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003

Wang, F., Huang, J., Zheng, X. L., Wu, J. Q., and Zhao, A. P. (2024). STEM Activities for Boosting Pupils’ Computational Thinking and Reducing their Cognitive Load: Roles of Argumentation Scaffolding and Mental Rotation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2398504

Waqar, A. (2024). Intelligent Decision Support Systems in Construction Engineering: An Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 249, 123503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123503

Yunianto, W., Cahyono, A. N., Prodromou, T., El-Bedewy, S., and Lavicza, Z. (2024). CT Integration in STEAM Learning: Fostering Students’ creativity by Making Batik Stamp Pattern. Science Activities: Projects and Curriculum Ideas in STEM Classrooms. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2024.2378860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2024.2378860

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Kapoor, T., Neha, Karthick, S., Mary, S. P., S. Simonthomas, & Thakuriya, K. (2025). DIGITAL CLAY MODELING WITH AI-ASSISTED FEEDBACK. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(5s), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6899