MACHINE VISION AND ITS IMPACT ON ART CRITICISM

Authors

  • Nidhi Tewatia Assistant Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, India
  • Dr. Sudeshna Sarkar Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Arka Jain University, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
  • Ms. Sanika Sahastrabuddhae Assistant Professor, Department of Interior Design, Parul Institute of Design, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • B. S. Seshadri Professor of Practice, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), Tamil Nadu, India
  • Dr. Alakananda Tripathy Associate Professor, Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • Kajal Sanjay Diwate Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune 411037, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6893

Keywords:

Machine Vision, Computational Aesthetics, Art Criticism, Visual Interpretation, Deep Learning, Curatorial Analytics

Abstract [English]

Machine vision has become a revolution in the art criticism of the present time whereby computational tools have been presented to extend, challenge, and redefine long-standing conventions of aesthetic criticism or assessment. The fact that artworks are becoming multimodal and digitized and even hybrid in nature has increased what the algorithms can detect, encode style, and analyze the compositional structures, which has widened the scope of interpretive inquiry. This paper explores the research of using machine vision enabled by neural networks of convolutional convolution, transformers, and vision-language models to model visual information systematically, including texture, color harmony, spatial depth, symbolic and narrative hints. The paper puts AI-driven criticism into a wider framework of seeking the meaning and the role of viewers and machines by applying cognitive theories of perception as well as philosophical approaches to perception and authorship. The methodology consists of the carefully selected collections of paintings, sculptures and digital works of art, as well as the powerful preprocessing pipelines to extract features and perform multimodal embedding. Results show that machine vision improves already existing systems of critique by the quantification of aesthetic qualities, the discovery of latent stylistic similarities, and the multi-layered patterns of interpretation not always evident to human viewers. In addition, AI methods are impacting curatorial practice, providing insights in the form of data to plan an exhibition, research the provenance, and engage the audience. The argument also points out the negative and positive aspects of computational aesthetics, noting the necessity of both human-AI interpretive ecosystems which allow cultural sensitivity but are friendly to people.

References

Ajorloo, S., Jamarani, A., Kashfi, M., Haghi Kashani, M., and Najafizadeh, A. (2024). A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Methods in Software Testing. Applied Soft Computing, 162, Article 111805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111805

Barglazan, A.-A., Brad, R., and Constantinescu, C. (2024). Image Inpainting Forgery Detection: A Review. Journal of Imaging, 10(2), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10020042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10020042

Brauwers, G., and Frasincar, F. (2023). A General Survey on Attention Mechanisms in Deep Learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(4), 3279–3298. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3126456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2021.3126456

Chen, G., Wen, Z., and Hou, F. (2023). Application of Computer Image Processing Technology in Old Artistic Design Restoration. Heliyon, 9(10), Article e21366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21366

Cheng, M. (2022). The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in Art. Proceedings, 81(1), Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110

Dobbs, T., and Ras, Z. (2022). On Art Authentication and the Rijksmuseum Challenge: A Residual Neural Network Approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 200, Article 116933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116933

Guo, D. H., Chen, H. X., Wu, R. L., and Wang, Y. G. (2023). AIGC Challenges and Opportunities Related to Public Safety: A Case Study of ChatGPT. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 4(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001

Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). AI on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Detection. ASM Science Journal, 20, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918

Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). Ethical Design of AI for Education and Learning Systems. ASM Science Journal, 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917

Lou, Y. Q. (2023). Human Creativity in the AIGC Era. Journal of Design, Economics and Innovation, 9(4), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002

Messer, U. (2024). Co-Creating Art with Generative Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Artworks and Artists. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2, Article 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100056

Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., and Savela, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Fine Arts: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1, Article 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004

Schaerf, L., Postma, E., and Popovici, C. (2024). Art Authentication with Vision Transformers. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 11849–11858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08864-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08864-8

Shao, L. J., Chen, B. S., Zhang, Z. Q., Zhang, Z., and Chen, X. R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) in Medicine: A Narrative Review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 21(2), 1672–1711. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073

Zaurín, J. R., and Mulinka, P. (2023). Pytorch-Widedeep: A Flexible Package for Multimodal Deep Learning. Journal of Open Source Software, 8(82), Article 5027. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.05027

Zeng, Z., Zhang, P., Qiu, S., Li, S., and Liu, X. (2024). A Painting Authentication Method Based on Multi-Scale Spatial-Spectral Feature Fusion and Convolutional Neural Network. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 118, Article 109315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109315

Downloads

Published

2025-12-28

How to Cite

Tewatia, N., Sarkar, S., Sahastrabuddhae, S. ., B. S. Seshadri, Tripathy, A., & Diwate, K. S. (2025). MACHINE VISION AND ITS IMPACT ON ART CRITICISM. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(5s), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i5s.2025.6893