ETHICAL CONCERNS IN AI-GENERATED SCULPTURAL ART
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i4s.2025.6864Keywords:
AI-Generated Sculpture, Ethical Authorship, Cultural Sustainability, Algorithmic Bias, Creative Autonomy, Intellectual Property in ArtAbstract [English]
The accelerated development of AI-created sculptural works has set new standards of creativity, authors, and expression of material, but it also delivers some serious ethical issues, questionable by conventional artistic and cultural paradigms. As the roles of generative models, mesh networks in 3D and computational fabrication tools continue to be integrated into the sculptural ideation and production processes, questions of authenticity of the sculptural intent, the validity of the hybrid human machine authorship arises as well as the risk of losing the craft-based knowledge systems. The transparency of AI algorithms also causes ethical concerns that the algorithm might include some sort of hidden bias that form the formal aesthetics, cultural themes, or symbolic forms in a manner that unintentionally misrepresents or steals heritage traditions. Additionally, culturally significant, or proprietary art, is frequently presented as a part of a training dataset, and understandings of the intellectual property rights, permission, and ethical obligations of the creators and institutions using such systems may be disputed. The second ethical factor is that the AI-generated sculptures can be commodified and scaled at a mass level, thereby causing disruptions in the socio-economic ecosystems of sculptors, teachers, designers, and local craft communities. At the same time, the standardization of the algorithmic optimization poses a danger of homogenization of art diversity, thus reducing pluralism of expression of sculptures between cultures. Additional environmental aspects such as the energy requirements of training models as well as the material disposal of rapid prototyping makes the issue of AI-driven sculptural practices even more consequential. This abstract shows the necessity to create transparent, accountable, and culturally respectful AI models that would be able to protect human creativity, the integrity of the arts, and fair co-existence between technological innovation and ancient sculptural arts.
References
Allen, J. W., Earp, B. D., Koplin, J., and Wilkinson, D. (2024). Consent‑GPT: Is It Ethical to Delegate Procedural Consent to Conversational AI? Journal of Medical Ethics, 50, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme%E2%80%912023%E2%80%91109347
Al‑kfairy, M., Mustafa, D., Kshetri, N., Insiew, M., and Alfandi, O. (2024). Ethical Challenges and Solutions of Generative AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Informatics, 11, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030058
Avlonitou, C., Papadaki, E., and Apostolakis, A. (2025). A Human‑AI Compass for Sustainable Art Museums: Navigating Opportunities and Challenges in Operations, Collections Management, and Visitor Engagement. Heritage, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8100422
Foka, A., and Griffin, G. (2024). AI, Cultural Heritage, and Bias: Some Key Queries That Arise from the Use of GenAI. Heritage, 7, 6125–6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7110287
Kiourexidou, M., and Stamou, S. (2025). Interactive Heritage: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Museums. Electronics, 14, 1884.
Li, F., Ruijs, N., and Lu, Y. (2023). Ethics and AI: A Systematic Review on Ethical Concerns and Related Strategies for Designing with AI in Healthcare. AI, 4, 28–53. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4010003
Michel‑Villarreal, R., Vilalta‑Perdomo, E., Salinas‑Navarro, D. E., Thierry‑Aguilera, R., and Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13, 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Mossavar‑Rahmani, F., and Zohuri, B. (2024). ChatGPT and Beyond the Next Generation of AI Evolution (A Communication). Journal of Energy and Power Engineering, 18, 146–154.
Qin, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, X., and Skare, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 1736–1770.
Saihood, G. S. W., Haddad, A. T. H., and Eyada, F. (2023). Personalized Experiences Within Heritage Buildings: Leveraging AI for Enhanced Visitor Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2023 16th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), Istanbul, Turkiye, 18–20 December 2023, 474–479.
Singh, A., Kanaujia, A., Singh, V. K., and Vinuesa, R. (2023). Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals: Bibliometric Patterns and Concept Evolution Trajectories. Sustainable Development, 32, 724–754.
Siri, A. (2024). Emerging Trends and Future Directions in Artificial Intelligence for Museums: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis Based on Scopus (1983–2024). Geopolitical, Social, Security and Freedom Journal, 7, 20–38.
Suchacka, M., Muster, R., and Wojewoda, M. (2021). Human and Machine Creativity: Social and Ethical Aspects of the Development of Artificial Intelligence. Creativity Studies, 14(2), 430–443. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.14316
Zhang, P., and Kamel Boulos, M. N. (2023). Generative AI in Medicine and Healthcare: Promises, Opportunities and Challenges. Future Internet, 15, 286.
Zhou, M., Abhishek, V., Derdenger, T., Kim, J., and Srinivasan, K. (2024). Bias in Generative AI. arXiv. arXiv:2403.02726
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shilpi Sarna, Neha Arora, Rajeev Sharma, Manivannan Karunakaran, Dr. Shashikant Patil, Ranjana Tiwari, Kiran Ingale

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























