ART MARKET PREDICTIONS THROUGH DEEP LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i4s.2025.6847Keywords:
Art Market Prediction, Deep Learning, Multimodal Fusion, CNN-LSTM Model, Price Forecasting, Cultural AnalyticsAbstract [English]
The international art market lends complex dynamics that interact with aesthetic perception, the cycle of economic activities and the mood of the investor, making it a difficult task to forecast prices. The paper presents a deep learning architecture that combines visual, contextual, and temporal data to predict the valuations of artworks with further accuracy. The study proposes a data engineering pipeline that is multimodal that includes curated image collections and structured information, including artist background, sales history, medium, and dimensions. A convolutional neural network (CNN) is used to produce high-level structure of artistic style and quality, whereas transformer and Long Short-Memory (LSTM) structures discover the temporal dynamics of price tendencies in the past. These modalities are amalgamated into a single embedding that is a combination of both visual and economic cues a fusion layer. This model is hyperparameter tuned and transferred learned with the help of pretrained encoders to optimize prediction accuracy and prevent overfitting with regularization measures. Findings indicate better performance compared to traditional econometric and regression models and better correlation with the real market trends and overall generalization across genres and time series. In addition to predictive ability, the framework offers interpretable information suggesting the impact of artistic qualities on valuation trends, therefore, linking computational intelligence to the art economics. The suggested system provides possible solutions in market analytics, auction prediction, and digital art investment platforms, which add to the development of data-driven decision-making in the creative economy.
References
Cheng, M. (2022). The Creativity of Artificial Intelligence in Art. Proceedings, 81, Article 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081110
Chod, J., and Lyandres, E. (2021). A Theory of ICOs: Diversification, Agency, and Information Asymmetry. Management Science, 67, 5969–5989. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3754
Cong, L. W., Li, X., Tang, K., and Yang, Y. (2023). Crypto Wash Trading. Management Science, 69, 6427–6454. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.02709
Cong, L. W., Li, Y., and Wang, N. (2020). Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation. Review of Financial Studies, 34, 1105–1155. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa089
Ferreira, D., Li, J., and Nikolowa, R. (2022). Corporate Capture of Blockchain Governance. Review of Financial Studies, 36, 1364–1407. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhac051
Griffin, J. M., and Shams, A. (2020). Is Bitcoin Really Untethered? The Journal of Finance, 75, 1913–1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12903
Gryglewicz, S., Mayer, S., and Morellec, E. (2021). Optimal Financing with Tokens. Journal of Financial Economics, 142, 1038–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.004
Guo, D. H., Chen, H. X., Wu, R. L., and Wang, Y. G. (2023). AIGC Challenges and Opportunities Related to Public Safety: A Case Study of ChatGPT. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 4, 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2023.08.001
Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). AI on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism Detection. ASM Science Journal, 20, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1918
Leong, W. Y., and Zhang, J. B. (2025). Ethical Design of AI for Education and Learning Systems. ASM Science Journal, 20, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32802/asmscj.2025.1917
Lou, Y. Q. (2023). Human Creativity in the AIGC Era. Journal of Design Economics and Innovation, 9, 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2024.02.002
Malinova, K., and Park, A. (2023). Tokenomics: When Tokens Beat Equity. Management Science, 69, 6568–6583. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4882
Oksanen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., and Savela, N. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Fine Arts: A systematic Review of Empirical Research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1, Article 100004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004
Pinto-Gutiérrez, C., Gaitán, S., Jaramillo, D., and Velasquez, S. (2022). The NFT Hype: What Draws Attention to Non-Fungible Tokens? Mathematics, 10, Article 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030335
Shao, L. J., Chen, B. S., Zhang, Z. Q., Zhang, Z., and Chen, X. R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) in Medicine: A Narrative Review. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 21(2), 1672–1711. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2024073
Sockin, M., and Xiong, W. (2023). A Model of Cryptocurrencies. Management Science, 69, 6684–6707. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4756
Taylor, S. J., and Letham, B. (2018). Forecasting at Scale. The American Statistician, 72, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2017.1380080
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sayantani De; Sadhana Sargam, Pratik Shrivastava, Jayapriya Mahesh, Dr. Podilapu Hanumantha Rao, Nimesh Raj, Payal Sunil Lahane

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.























