PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR ART GALLERY MANAGEMENT

Authors

  • Dr. Sarita Mohapatra Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • Dr. Sarita Mohapatra Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • Ms. Aarsi Kumari Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Applications, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • Komal Parashar Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura- 140417, Punjab, India
  • Ramneek Kelsang Bawa Assistant Professor, School of Business Management, Noida International University, India
  • Gayathri D Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), Tamil Nadu, India
  • Pradnya Yuvraj Patil Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering Vishwakarma Institute of Technology, Pune, Maharashtra, 411037, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i4s.2025.6843

Keywords:

Predictive Analytics, Art Gallery Management, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Visitor Forecasting

Abstract [English]

The study examines how an efficient and intelligent art gallery management can be developed using predictive models that integrate both data-driven decision-making and creativity and curatorial work. Contemporary art spaces are increasingly struggling with the issue of predicting visitor behavior, arranging the layout of the artwork, controlling the environment, and making sales predictions. In order to deal with such complexities, the work applies machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and statistical modeling methods to the problem of working with multi-source data, such as visitor logs, artwork metadata, pricing history, and ambient sensor measurements. To be able to predict visitor attendance accuracy, schedule exhibitions dynamically, and base their approaches on data analysis, the proposed predictive framework combines time-series forecasting, regression modeling, and classification analysis. The study assesses the accuracy of models in relation to different datasets and the interpretability of the models through feature engineering, and validation measures like RMSE, MAE, and R 2. Besides, the system focuses on real-time flexibility, which allows the galleries to be proactive in reacting to the fluctuating audience dynamics and market demands. The models that were obtained exhibit considerable enhanced operational efficiency, visitor attitude and sales prediction accuracy, providing a platform to digitalize the management of the gallery.

References

Ajorloo, S., Jamarani, A., Kashfi, M., Haghi Kashani, M., and Najafizadeh, A. (2024). A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Methods in Software Testing. Applied Soft Computing, 162, Article 111805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.111805

Aubry, M., Kraeussl, R., Manso, G., and Spaenjers, C. (2023). Biased Auctioneers. The Journal of Finance, 78(2), 795–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13203

Barglazan, A.-A., Brad, R., and Constantinescu, C. (2024). Image Inpainting Forgery Detection: A Review. Journal of Imaging, 10(2), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging10020042

Borisov, V., Leemann, T., Seßler, K., Haug, J., Pawelczyk, M., and Kasneci, G. (2022). Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 35(6), 7499–7519. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3229161

Chen, G., Wen, Z., and Hou, F. (2023). Application of Computer Image Processing Technology in Old Artistic Design Restoration. Heliyon, 9(11), Article e21366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21366

Dobbs, T., and Ras, Z. (2022). On Art Authentication and the Rijksmuseum Challenge: A Residual Neural Network Approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 200, Article 116933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116933

Gómez, S., Tascon, M., Martínez, J., and Elad, M. (2020). SVD entropy: An Image Quality Measure Based on Singular Value Decomposition. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 81, 49–53.

Leonarduzzi, R., Liu, H., and Wang, Y. (2018). Scattering Transform and Sparse Linear Classifiers for Art Authentication. Signal Processing, 150, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2018.03.012

Liu, C. (2022). Prediction and Analysis of Artwork Price Based on Deep Neural Network. Scientific Programming, 2022, Article 7133910. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7133910

Ma, M. X., Noussair, C. N., and Renneboog, L. (2022). Colors, Emotions, and the Auction Value of Paintings. European Economic Review, 142, Article 104004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.104004

Schaerf, L., Postma, E., and Popovici, C. (2024). Art Authentication with Vision Transformers. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(18), 11849–11858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08864-8

Smith, J. D., and Johnson, A. B. (2020). Improving Predictive Accuracy in art Market Models using Ensemble Methods. Journal of Art and Artificial Intelligence, 15, 102–118.

Zehtab-Salmasi, A., Feizi-Derakhshi, A. R., Nikzad-Khasmakhi, N., Asgari-Chenaghlu, M., and Nabipour, S. (2021). Multimodal Price Prediction. Annals of Data Science, 10(4), 619–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-021-00326-z

Zeng, Z., Zhang, P., Qiu, S., Li, S., and Liu, X. (2024). A Painting Authentication Method Based on Multi-Scale Spatial–Spectral Feature Fusion and Convolutional Neural Network. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 118, Article 109315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109315

Downloads

Published

2025-12-25

How to Cite

Mohapatra, D. S., Mohapatra, S., Kumari, A., Parashar, K., Bawa, R. K., D, G., & Patil, P. Y. (2025). PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR ART GALLERY MANAGEMENT. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 6(4s), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v6.i4s.2025.6843