A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF WORD ORDER OF KASHMIRI AND SHINA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.6054Keywords:
Gurez Valley, Kashmiri, Gurezi Shina, Word Order, Dardic Languages, Sov, V2Abstract [English]
This paper compares the clause-level word order of two Dardic (Indo-Aryan) varieties spoken in India’s Gurez Valley: Kashmiri spoken in Kashmir and Gurezi Shina in Gurez Valley (UT) of Jammu and Kashmir. We report on fieldwork eliciting parallel sentences in each language, categorising them by syntactic (simple, compound, complex) and semantic types (negative, imperative, interrogative, declarative, exclamatory). Our findings show that Gurezi Shina maintains a rigid SOV structure in nearly all contexts. In contrast, Kashmiri exhibits a more flexible, verb-second (V2) pattern with surface SVO or OSV orders in main clauses (as noted by Bhatt). We highlight how Kashmiri’s underlying SOV order surfaces differently in subordinate clauses (consistent with Bhatt’s observations), while Gurezi Shina consistently places the finite verb clause-finally. These contrasts have implications for typology (rigid vs. flexible OV/VO alignment), linguistic history (Dardic vs. Indo-Aryan features), and processing (different subject placement strategies). Our results confirm that Gurezi Shina aligns with the common SOV typology of Himalayan languages, whereas Kashmiri remains an Indo-Aryan anomaly with Germanic-like V2 behaviour.
References
Ahmed, M. (2017). A description of phrase structure in Gurezi Shina. Interdisciplinary Journal of Linguistics, 10, 55–72.
Ahmed, M. (2019). A descriptive grammar of Gurezi Shina. SIL International.
Adam, N., & Hölzl, A. (2024). Subjects in word order and alignment typology. In A. Alexiadou, D. Georgi, F. Heck, G. Müller, & F. Schäfer (Eds.), Gisbert Fanselow’s Contributions to Syntactic Theory (Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 96, pp. 311–322). Universität Leipzig.
Bhatt, R. M. (1995). Verb movement in Kashmiri. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 1–14.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/AD0616323
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of subject, object, and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved from https://wals.info/chapter/81
Grierson, G. A. (1906). The Piśāca languages of north-western India. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 2(1), 1–30.
Hook, P. E., & Koul, O. N. (1997). Kashmiri: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. Katha.
Koul, O. N. (2006). Linguistic studies of Kashmiri. In R. Singh (Ed.), Studies in Indo-Aryan Linguistics (pp. 145–151). Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110186611.145
Masica, C. P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge University Press.
Pandit, R. S. (1935). The Saga of the Kings of Kashmir (Ranjit Sitaram Pandit, Trans.). Sahitya Akademi.
Wali, K., & Koul, O. N. (1987). Kashmiri: A cognitive-descriptive grammar. Routledge.
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), WALS Online (Version 2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sheeba Hassan , Tahseen Hassan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.