SIGNATURE VERIFICATION USING LOW TRAINING SAMPLE REGIMES

Authors

  • Dr. Vinayak A. Bharadi Information Technology Department, Finolex Academy of Management and Technology, Ratnagiri (MH), India
  • Dr. Manoj Chavan Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering Department, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Mumbai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.6032

Abstract [English]

Signature verification systems often rely on a substantial number of user-enrolled samples to achieve high accuracy. However, real-world applications such as mobile banking and forensic verification often encounter constraints that limit the availability of training data. This study investigates the performance of a signature verification system trained with only 3 to 8 genuine signatures per user. Using the SVC 2004 dataset and hybrid wavelet transform (HWT)-based features, we analyze system behavior across different enrollment sizes and evaluate Equal Error Rate (EER), False Acceptance Rate (FAR), and False Rejection Rate (FRR). Results demonstrate that with optimized preprocessing and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) configurations, acceptable accuracy can be achieved even in low-sample regimes, with an EER of 5.1% using only 5 samples. These findings suggest that signature biometrics can be effectively deployed in limited-data scenarios.

References

Jain, A. K., Flynn, P., & Ross, A. A. (2011). Introduction to Biometrics. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77326-1

Impedovo, D., & Pirlo, G. (2008). Automatic Signature Verification: State of the Art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2008.923866

Galbally, J., Marcel, S., & Fierrez, J. (2015). Biometric Antispoofing Methods: A Survey in Face, Iris, and Fingerprint Modalities. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2381273

Rattani, A., & Derakhshani, R. (2019). A Survey of Online Signature Verification. IEEE Access.

Ferrer, M. A., Galbally, J., & Alonso-Fernandez, F. (2020). Exploiting Explainable AI Techniques for Online Signature Verification. Pattern Recognition Letters.

Hassanat, A. B. A., & Jassim, S. A. (2022). A Review of Biometric Authentication Systems Using Hidden Markov Models. Expert Systems with Applications.

Kisku, D. R., & Rattani, A. (2021). Biometric Recognition: Challenges and Solutions for Lightweight Models. Springer.

Chavan, M., et al. (2017). Pressure-Driven Feature Selection in Signatures. In Proceedings of ICCUBEA.

Kekre, H. B., & Bharadi, V. A. (2014). Hybrid Wavelet Transform Construction Using Two Orthogonal Transforms. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security.

SVC 2004 Signature Dataset. http://www.cse.ust.hk/svc2004/

Yilmaz, O., et al. (2020). Improving Signature Verification with Deep Pressure Features. Computers & Security.

Bharadi, V., & Chavan, M. (2015). HWT Feature Vector Generation for Signature Verification. In IEEE Confluence.

Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and Selected Applications in Speech Recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-051584-7.50027-9

Revaud, J., Douze, M., Schmid, C., & Jegou, H. (2012). Event Retrieval in Video Using Signature Descriptors. In CVPR.

Rantzsch, H., et al. (2020). Deep Learning-Based Signature Verification Using Siamese Networks. Pattern Recognition Letters.

Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.

Bilmes, J. (1998). A Gentle Tutorial on the EM Algorithm and its Application to HMMs. University of California, Berkeley.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Vinayak A. Bharadi, & Chavan, M. (2022). SIGNATURE VERIFICATION USING LOW TRAINING SAMPLE REGIMES. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 3(2), 1394–1397. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.6032