PRESSURE DYNAMICS AS A KEY FEATURE IN ONLINE SIGNATURE BIOMETRICS

Authors

  • Dr. Vinayak A. Bharadi Information Technology Department, Finolex Academy of Management and Technology, Ratnagiri (MH), India
  • Dr. Manoj Chavan Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering Department, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Mumbai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i1.2022.6030

Abstract [English]

Online signature verification has gained prominence as a behavioral biometric modality due to its non-intrusive acquisition and inherent individual variability. Among several dynamic parameters captured during the signing process—pressure, azimuth, altitude, and timing—this study identifies pressure as the most discriminative feature. Through systematic experimentation using the SVC 2004 dataset and Hybrid Wavelet Transform (HWT) based feature extraction, we compare classification performance using individual and combined features. The results demonstrate that pressure alone achieves higher accuracy and lower Equal Error Rate (EER) than azimuth or timing features. Statistical analysis confirms pressure’s superior consistency, discriminatory power, and robustness against forgery.

References

Jain, A. K., et al. (2011). Introduction to Biometrics. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77326-1

Impedovo, D., & Pirlo, G. (2008). Automatic Signature Verification: The State of the Art. IEEE Trans. SMC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2008.923866

Ferrer, M. A., et al. (2020). Signature Verification Based on Dynamic Characteristics. Pattern Recognition Letters.

Galbally, J., et al. (2015). Biometric Antispoofing Methods: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2381273

Plamondon, R., & Srihari, S. N. (2000). Online and Off-line Handwriting Recognition: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE PAMI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/047134608X.W5508

Fierrez, J., et al. (2018). A Perspective on Signature Biometrics. ACM Computing Surveys.

Kholmatov, A., & Yanikoglu, B. (2005). Identity Authentication Using Improved Online Signature Verification. PRL. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.04.017

Rattani, A., & Derakhshani, R. (2019). A Survey of Online Signature Verification. IEEE Access.

Hassanat, A., & Jassim, S. (2022). Efficient HMM Parameter Estimation for Biometric Sequence Modeling. Expert Systems with Applications.

[Galbally, J., Marcel, S., & Fierrez, J. (2020). Biometric Quality: Review and Applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

SVC 2004 Signature Dataset. http://www.cse.ust.hk/svc2004/

Kekre, H. B., & Bharadi, V. A. (2014). Hybrid Wavelet Transform Using Orthogonal Pairs. IJCSIS.

Bharadi, V., & Chavan, M. (2015). Pressure-Driven Feature Selection in Signatures. In Proceedings of ICCUBEA.

Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer.

Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A Tutorial on Hidden Markov Models. IEEE Proceedings. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/5.18626

Yilmaz, O., et al. (2021). Pressure Analysis for Writer Identification on Tablets. Computers & Security.

Marzinotto, S., et al. (2011). User-Centric Evaluation of Signature Biometrics on Mobile Devices. IEEE BTAS.

Rantzsch, H., et al. (2020). Deep Signature Matching Using Siamese Networks. Pattern Recognition Letters.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Bharadi, V. A., & Chavan, M. (2022). PRESSURE DYNAMICS AS A KEY FEATURE IN ONLINE SIGNATURE BIOMETRICS. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 3(1), 1142–1144. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i1.2022.6030