FAIR AND TRANSPARENT STUDENT PLACEMENT PREDICTIONS: A MACHINE LEARNING AND EXPLAINABLE AI (XAI) APPROACH

Authors

  • Anjali Jindia Department of Computer Science and Applications, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
  • Sonal Chawla Department of Computer Science and Applications, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.5996

Keywords:

Career Path Prediction, Explainable Ai (Xai), Machine Learning, Bias Mitigation, Lime, Shap

Abstract [English]

Career path prediction plays a vital role in guiding students towards successful careers by offering personalized recommendations based on academic performance, skills, interests, and market trends. Early career path identification allows students to develop relevant skills and gain necessary experience, increasing their competitiveness in the job market. This study aims to ensure fair and transparent predictions by leveraging Machine Learning (ML) and Explainable AI (XAI) techniques on student career dataset. Initially, ML algorithms were applied to predict placement status, followed by an assessment of the model for bias using XAI. Upon detecting bias, mitigation strategies were implemented to enhance fairness. The use of XAI techniques improved model transparency and trustworthiness, allowing stakeholders to understand and trust the decision-making process. The methodology involved identifying and addressing dataset imbalances that could skew predictions. By applying oversampling techniques, the dataset was balanced, leading to significant improvements in model performance. The initial model showed poor performance metrics due to data imbalance, but after oversampling, the F1 score improved. Further application of XAI techniques, such as Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapely Additive exPlanation (SHAP), provided deeper insights into the model's decision-making process. This analysis highlighted specific features that, when oversampled, further enhanced the F1 score. The study emphasizes the importance of using XAI to not only improve mod el performance but also provide a trustworthy framework for stakeholders. By evaluating models using metrics like recall, precision, accuracy, and F1 score, the study demonstrated that integrating fairness and transparency into predictive models is achievable and beneficial for ensuring equitable student placement outcomes.

References

"Predicting College Students’ Placements Based on Academic Performance Using Machine Learning Approaches", Mukesh Kumar, Nidhi Walia, Sushil Bansal, Girish Kumar, Korhan Cengiz, International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), Vol.15, No.6, pp. 1-13, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2023.06.01

“Student Placement Analyzer: A Recommendation System Using Machine”, Apoorva Rao R, Deeksha K C, Vishal Prajwal R, Vrushak K, Nandini, JETIR, Volume 7, Issue 5, May 2020.

“Placement Prediction using Various Machine Learning Models and their Efficiency Comparison”, Irene Treesa Jose, Daibin Raju, Jeebu Abraham Aniyankunju, Joel James, Mereen Thomas Vadakke International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, Volume 5, Issue 5, May – 2020.

Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., & Asoh, H. Fairness-aware learning through regularization approach. In Proceedings of the 16th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 643-654, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2011.83

Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. "Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135-1144, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

D. G. Kleinbaum and M. Klein, Logistic Regression: A Self-Learning Text, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1742-3

Wickramasinghe, I., Kalutarage, H. Naive Bayes: applications, variations and vulnerabilities: a review of literature

with code snippets for implementation. Soft Comput 25, 2277–2293, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05297-6

Quinlan, J.R. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn 1, 81–106, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022643204877

Couronné, R., Probst, P. & Boulesteix, AL. Random forest versus logistic regression: a large-scale benchmark experiment. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 270, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2264-5

T. Cover and P. Hart, "Nearest neighbor pattern classification," in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21-27, Jan. 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Jindia, A., & Chawla, S. (2024). FAIR AND TRANSPARENT STUDENT PLACEMENT PREDICTIONS: A MACHINE LEARNING AND EXPLAINABLE AI (XAI) APPROACH. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(4), 2082–2094. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.5996