PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS BRACING SYSTEMS IN RESISTING LATERAL LOADS: A LIMIT STATE DESIGN PERSPECTIVE

Authors

  • Dhaval P. Advani Assistant Professor at Applied Mechanics Department, S. S. Engineering College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
  • Himmat K Sarvaiya Assistant Professor at Applied Mechanics Department, S. S. Engineering College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India
  • Mihir B. baldania Assistant Professor at Applied Mechanics Department, L. E. College Morbi, Gujarat, India
  • Pratik B. Somaiya Assistant Professor at Applied Mechanics Department, GEC, Rajkot, Gujarat, India
  • Nayan P. Soni Assistant Professor at Civil Engineering Department, S. S. Engineering College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.5584

Keywords:

Bracing System, Limit State Philosophy, Lateral Load, Steel Section

Abstract [English]

This paper presents a comparative study on the effectiveness of various bracing systems in multi-story steel buildings, a critical aspect of structural design given the significant influence of lateral loads. While bracing systems are globally recognized as a superior solution for resisting lateral forces, their comparative performance across different configurations requires detailed investigation. The study models a 20-story steel building with a uniform layout, incorporating four distinct bracing types: knee, Z, X, and V bracings along with bare frame model. Using the commercial software Staad Pro V8i for analysis, the comparison measures the crucial performance indicators such as top story displacement, and the axial force, bending moment, and shear forces experienced by columns. All structural sections are designed in accordance with IS 800:2007, integrating the Limit State Design philosophy. The findings aim to demonstrate the impact of these different bracing configurations on the structural response of multi-story steel buildings under lateral loads.

References

Books and Manuals:

Taranath, B. S. (n.d.). Wind and earthquake resistant buildings: Structural analysis and design.

Subramanian, N. (n.d.). Design of steel structures: Based on limit state method of design as per IS 800:2007.

Bentley Systems. (2013). STAAD.Pro user’s manual. Bentley Software.

Standards (Indian Standards - IS Codes):

Bureau of Indian Standards. (2007). IS 800:2007 – General construction in steel – Code of practice. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

Bureau of Indian Standards. (2016). IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016 – Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

Bureau of Indian Standards. (1987). IS 875 (Part 1): 1987 – Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures: Dead loads. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

Bureau of Indian Standards. (1987). IS 875 (Part 2): 1987 – Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures: Imposed loads. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

Bureau of Indian Standards. (1987). IS 875 (Part 3): 1987 – Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures: Wind loads. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

Journal Articles:

Dhokane, P. M., & Pathak, V. N. (2016). A study on the effectiveness of bracing systems in soft storey steel buildings. Journal of Today’s Ideas – Tomorrow’s Technologies (JOTITT), 4(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.15415/jotitt.2016.42006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15415/jotitt.2016.42006

Kaveh Nezamisavojbolaghi (2019). Using concentric and zipper steel braces by comparison of effect on improved seismic performance level of concrete moment frame structures with moderate ductility. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1879-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1879-0

Chen, X., Hu, Y., & Zhou, T. (2022). Research on safety risk management of a steel bracing system based on catastrophe theory. Sustainability, 14(8), 4879. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084879

Patel, P. P., & Joshi, D. D. (2022). Mitigation of progressive collapse of multi-storey steel building by providing Chevron bracings. In B. Kondraivendhan et al. (Eds.), Sustainable Building Materials and Construction (pp. 495–508). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7397-9_36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7397-9_36

Hassan, R. M., & Shrestha, P. B. (2023). Unveiling the seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames: A comprehensive review. Buildings, 13(3), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030567

Singh, R., Verma, P., & Sharma, N. (2023). Reliability of steel structures with chevron bracing systems under seismic loading. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 70(1), 112–124. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s44147-023-00127-z

Acosta, A., Martinez, L., & Ramirez, J. (2024). Seismic performance of steel buildings with eccentrically braced frame systems with different configurations. Structures, 48, 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.11.059

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Advani, D. P., Sarvaiya, H. K., baldania, M. B., Somaiya, P. B., & Soni, N. P. (2024). PERFORMANCE OF VARIOUS BRACING SYSTEMS IN RESISTING LATERAL LOADS: A LIMIT STATE DESIGN PERSPECTIVE. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(4), 1876–1884. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.5584