SMART TECHNOLOGIES FOR RURAL TRANSFORMATION: A MULTISECTORAL STUDY OF AI, IOT, BLOCKCHAIN, AND AR/VR ADOPTION IN HEALTHCARE, FOOD SYSTEMS, AND ECO-TOURISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v3.i2.2022.5312Keywords:
Emerging Technologies, Rural Health, Fast Food, Eco-Tourism, Scalability, Survey-Based Research, SustainabilityAbstract [English]
Research evaluates the implementation and consequences of contemporary technologies in combination with telemedicine and wearable devices along with blockchain and IoT sensors and GIS and AR/VR while considering stakeholder needs centered on accessibility and scalability and sustainability. A survey of 240 rural stakeholders from Jharkhand, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh demonstrates the fundamental conclusions. The findings show that internet infrastructure directly influences telemedicine adoption since 82% of healthcare providers enabled telemedicine in areas with connected infrastructure but this rate reduced to 45% in regions with limited internet access. The high cost of wearable devices combined with their limited ability to integrate into existing healthcare systems (55% and 45% of respondents respectively) prevent wider adoption in chronic disease management. Due to data privacy concerns and a lack of specialized expertise AI-driven diagnostics achieved a 75–80% increase in diagnostic accuracy yet remained slow to gain wide acceptance. Blockchain technology adoption reached 20% in rural food systems which resulted in a 40% increase of item traceability along with a 30% decrease in food-related fraud. IoT sensors became popular with 50% of suppliers yet their adoption remained limited by both high costs which affected 70% of suppliers and insufficient technical knowledge which prevented 50% of suppliers from implementing them. Our analysis demonstrates GIS-based approaches provided :78% biodiversity benefits in Manali during this research period while areas without GIS technology achieved :48% biodiversity benefits. Sixty percent of operators reported that AR/VR adoption improved tourist engagement yet faced issues regarding expensive energy use (70%) and limited affordability (60%). Data reveals critical systemic issues which combine insufficient infrastructure with affordability problems and policy weaknesses and that require strategic financial support and capability development projects to address. This study demonstrates actionable strategies for rural technology adoption using stakeholder-relevant values of inclusivity and sustainability which supports development across health, food systems and eco-tourism through strategic gap bridging endeavors.
References
T. Haque, “Resource use efficiency in Indian agriculture,” Indian J. Agric. Econ., vol. 61, pp. 65–76, 2006.
M. Cui, Y. Guo, and J. Chen, “Influence of transfer plot area and location on chemical input reduction in agricultural production: evidence from China,” Agriculture, vol. 13, p. 1794, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13091794
A.R. Anik, S. Rahman, and J. R. Sarker, “Agricultural productivity growth and the role of capital in South Asia (1980–2013),” Sustainability, vol. 9, p. 470, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030470
R. Lencucha, N. E. Pal, A. Appau, A. M. Thow, and J. Drope, “Government policy and agricultural production: a scoping review to inform research and policy on healthy agricultural commodities,” Glob. Health, vol. 16, pp. 1–15, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-0542-2
O. Calicioglu, A. Flammini, S. Bracco, L. Bellù, and R. R. Sims, “The future challenges of food and agriculture: an integrated analysis of trends and solutions,” Sustainability, vol. 11, p. 222, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010222
T. Singh et al., “Energy balance, productivity and resource-use efficiency of diverse sustainable intensification options of rainfed lowland rice systems under different fertility scenarios,” Sustainability, vol. 14, p. 3657, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063657
M. De Zoysa, “Ecotourism development and biodiversity conservation in Sri Lanka: objectives, conflicts and resolutions,” Open J. Ecol., vol. 12, pp. 638–666, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2022.1210037
M. G. Muluneh, “Impact of climate change on biodiversity and food security: a global perspective—a review article,” Agric. Food Secur., vol. 10, pp. 1–25, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00318-5
J. P. Deguine et al., “Integrated pest management: good intentions, hard realities. A review,” Agron. Sustain. Dev., vol. 41, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00689-w
A.Bathaei and D. Štreimikiene, “A systematic review of agricultural sustainability indicators,” Agriculture, vol. 13, p. 241, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020241
A.Purvis, Y. Mao, and D. Robinson, “Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 14, pp. 681–695, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
R. Çakmakçı, M. A. Salık, and S. Çakmakçı, “Assessment and principles of environmentally sustainable food and agriculture systems,” Agric., vol. 13, pp. 1–27, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051073
E. Öhlund, M. Malmaeus, and E. Fauré, “The significance of different realms of value for agricultural land in Sweden,” Land Use Policy, vol. 96, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104714
V. C. Tavares et al., “The value of farmland and its determinants—the current state of the art,” Land, vol. 11, p. 1908, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111908
S. Jayaraman et al., “Conservation agriculture as a system to enhance ecosystem services,” Agric., vol. 11, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080718
A.Rosemarin et al., “Circular nutrient solutions for agriculture and wastewater – a review of technologies and practices,” Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., vol. 45, pp. 78–91, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.09.007
B.Amorim et al., “Food processing: an overview on links between safety, security, supply chains, and NOVA classification,” Clean. Circ. Bioeconomy, vol. 5, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcb.2023.100047
E. E. Elemike et al., “The role of nanotechnology in the fortification of plant nutrients and improvement of crop production,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 1–32, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9030499
A.Gamage et al., “Role of organic farming for achieving sustainability in agriculture,” Farming Syst., vol. 1, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100005
K. Pawlak, “The Role of Agriculture in Ensuring Food Security in Developing Countries: Considerations in the Context of the Problem of Sustainable Food Production,” 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135488
International Labour Organizations, Work. Employ. Cond. Agric. Sect. Thail., 2021.
M. Javaid et al., “Enhancing smart farming through the applications of Agriculture 4.0 technologies,” Int. J. Intell. Netw., vol. 3, pp. 150–164, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin.2022.09.004
S. K. Lowder, J. Skoet, and T. Raney, “The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide,” World Dev., vol. 87, pp. 16–29, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.041
W. Geng et al., “Digital technologies adoption and economic benefits in agriculture: a mixed methods approach,” Sustainability, vol. 16, p. 4431, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114431
J. Krebs and S. Bach, “Permaculture-scientific evidence of principles for the agroecological design of farming systems,” Sustain., vol. 10, pp. 1–24, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093218
A.Folke and J. Colding, “Traditional conservation practices,” Encycl. Biodivers. Second Ed., vol. 5, pp. 226–235, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00144-1
M. M. Anwar et al., “Quantifying the impacts of urbanization on urban agriculture and food security in the megacity Lahore, Pakistan,” Sustainability, vol. 15, p. 12143, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612143
T. Van Gerrewey et al., “Vertical farming: the only way is up?,” Agronomy, vol. 12, pp. 1–15, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010002
S. Jiang et al., “Structure and stability of agroforestry ecosystems: insights into the improvement of service supply capacity of agroforestry ecosystems under the karst rocky desertification control,” Forests, vol. 13, pp. 1–22, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13060878
U. Lisec et al., “Sustainable grassland-management systems and their effects on the physicochemical properties of soil,” Plants, vol. 13, p. 838, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13060838
K. Karlsson Green et al., “Making sense of integrated pest management (IPM) in the light of evolution,” Evol. Appl., vol. 13, pp. 1791–1805, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13067
R. Collier, “Pest insect management in vegetable crops grown outdoors in northern Europe – approaches at the bottom of the IPM pyramid,” Front. Hortic., vol. 2, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fhort.2023.1159375
R.Iqbal et al., “Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches—a review,” Bull. Natl. Res. Cent., vol. 44, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00290-3
Y.A. Yigezu et al., “Enhancing adoption of agricultural technologies requiring high initial investment among smallholders,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 134, pp. 199–206, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.006
T.M. Dahiru and H. Tanko, “The prospects of organic agriculture and yield improvement in the 21st Century,” Int. J. Innov. Agric. Biol. Res., vol. 6, pp. 40–48, 2018.
E.M. Meemken and M. Qaim, “Organic agriculture, food security, and the environment,” Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., vol. 10, pp. 39–63, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023252
C.I. D. Rodrigues et al., “Soil Carbon sequestration in the context of climate change mitigation: a review,” Soil Syst., vol. 7, p. 64, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7030064
A.Loconto et al., “The land sparing – land sharing controversy: tracing the politics of knowledge,” Land Use Policy, vol. 96, pp. 0–23, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.014
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kanika Khanna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
