THE IMPACT OF LOVE ATTITUDES ON MATE PREFERENCES: A STUDY ON EMERGING ADULTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.5286Abstract [English]
This study examines the role of love attitudes in shaping mate preferences among 300 emerging adults aged 18–25 from urban and semi-urban India. Using Lee’s Love Styles framework, the research explores how love orientations—Agape, Eros, Storge, Pragma, Ludus, and Mania—predict preferences for traits such as kindness, attractiveness, religiosity, and intelligence. Participants completed the Love Attitudes Scale and a Mate Preference Scale.
The findings reveal significant relationships between love attitudes and mate preferences. Agape and Storge predicted preferences for kindness and dependability, reflecting the importance of selflessness and companionship in fostering long-term relational stability. Eros was associated with preferences for physical attractiveness and sexuality, aligning with evolutionary theories on immediate compatibility. Pragma predicted preferences for religiosity, chastity, and status, influenced by cultural norms in collectivist societies. Agape also predicted preferences for education and intelligence, emphasizing intellectual compatibility.
These results highlight the interplay of emotional orientations, cultural values, and gender dynamics in partner selection. By providing a culturally contextualized understanding of mate preferences, the study contributes to relationship counseling and personal development. Future research should explore these dynamics across diverse populations and longitudinal contexts to further validate these findings
References
Buss, D. M. (1985). Human mate selection. American Scientist, 73(1), 47–51.
Cottrell, C. A., Neuberg, S. L., & Li, N. P. (2007). What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.208
Fisher, H. E. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. Henry Holt and Company.
Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.76.1.72
Gebauer, J. E., Leary, M. R., & Neberich, W. (2012). Big Two personality and Big Three mate preferences: Similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(12), 1579–1593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212456300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212456300
Gonzaga, G. C., Keltner, D., Londahl, E. A., & Smith, M. D. (2001). Love and the commitment problem in romantic relations and friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.2.247
Goodwin, R. (1999). Personal relationships across cultures. Routledge.
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1995). Men’s and women’s preferences in mates: A tale of two genders. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772531
Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. S. (1998). The Love Attitudes Scale: Short Form. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598152001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598152001
Jonason, P. K., & Kavanagh, P. (2010). The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 606–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.030
Kuperberg, A., & Padgett, J. E. (2016). The role of culture in mate preferences and marital satisfaction. Marriage & Family Review, 52(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2016.1184216
Lamy, L., Fischer-Lokou, J., & Guéguen, N. (2020). Friendship and attraction: The mediating role of love styles in relationships. Interpersona, 14(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v14i1.371
Lee, J. A. (1973). Colours of Love: An Exploration of the Ways of Loving. New Press.
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the trade-offs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.947 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.947
Li, Y. J., Zhang, W., & Su, W. (2013). Cultural differences in mate preferences: Values and traditions shaping romantic choices. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 810–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.001
Marchi, A., Csajbók, Z., & Jonason, P. K. (2023). 24 ways to be compatible with your relationship partners: Sex differences, context effects, and love styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 209, 111177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.111177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112134
Meskó, N., Zsidó, A. N., Láng, A., & Karádi, K. (2021). Sex and relationship differences on the Short Love Attitude Scale: Insights from the Hungarian adaptation. Sexuality & Culture, 25(4), 1249–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09854-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09830-z
Nascimento, B. S., Little, A. C., Monteiro, R. P., Hanel, P. H., & Vione, K. C. (2022). Attachment styles and mate-retention: Exploring the mediating role of relationship satisfaction. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 16(4), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000272
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, F. S., & Cate, R. (2000). Partner preferences: What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term and long-term romantic partners? Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_01
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.49.1.95
Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023
Sprecher, S., & Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056439
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (1998). Passionate and companionate love in courting and young married couples. Sociological Inquiry, 68(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00460.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1998.tb00459.x
Sprecher, S., & Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A cross-cultural comparison of mate preferences among university students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 531–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005001
Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(6), 1074–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.6.1074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.6.1074
Wojciszke, B., Abele, A. E., & Baryla, W. (1998). Two dimensions of interpersonal attitudes: Liking depends on communion, respect depends on agency. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(1), 97–114.
Zhao, Z., & Wright, C. (2020). Personality traits and love attitudes as predictors of mate retention strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(3), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000300
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Arpit Sharma, Prof. (Dr.) Anjum Mahdi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
