UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL STIGMA RELATED TO RELIGION AND WOMEN IN INDIA AND IDENTIFYING WAYS TO PROMOTE DEMOCRACY

Authors

  • Baijayanti Ghosh Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Krishnagar Women's College, Krishnagar, Nadia, West Bengal. PIN-741101, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v2.i1.2021.5059

Keywords:

Social Discrimination, Employment Opportunity, Indian Democracy, Religious Impact, Women Empowerment

Abstract [English]

The study has tried to connect social stigma and religion that exist in India especially among women causing their distress. Indian women suffer from discrimination in all places that restricts their contribution to society. The research has highlighted that Christian groups of women expressed a feeling of suppression and discrimination by 30% in a survey of 2020. The POSH Act fails to address the social injustice that religious scriptures impose on this patriarchal society. Thus, a secondary qualitative study has been conducted to critically examine the factors influencing social stigma and causes of insufficient democracy in India.

References

Aldersey, H. M., Kavira, S., Kiasimbua, J., Lokako, W., Miaka, P., & Monte, L. (2018). Stigma experienced by families with members with intellectual disabilities in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Intervention Journal of Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Conflict Affected Areas, 16(2), 119-128. https://journals.lww.com/invn/_layouts/15/oaks.journals/downloadpdf.aspx?an=02273348-201816020-00009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/INTV.INTV_13_18

Aswathy, P., & Kalpana, K. (2018). The ‘stigma’of paid work: capital, state, patriarchy and women fish workers in South India. Journal of International Women's Studies, 19(5), 113-128. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol19/iss5/8

Barak-Corren, N. (2017). Beyond dissent and compliance: Religious decision makers and secular law. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 6(2), 293-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwx002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwx002

BBC (2018). Sabarimala temple: India's top court revokes ban on women. BBC. Retrieved on: 7 April 2025 from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-45652182

Davis, L., & Gao, J. (2020). Preferences or patriarchy: why do religious women work less?. Social Indicators Research, 147(1), 287-310. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=3295129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02152-6

Diehl, A., Vieira, D. L., Zaneti, M. M., Fanganiello, A., Sharan, P., Robles, R., & de Jesus Mari, J. (2017). Social stigma, legal and public health barriers faced by the third gender phenomena in Brazil, India and Mexico: Travestis, hijras and muxes. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 63(5), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764017706989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764017706989

Dutt, A. (2018). Locating patriarchy in violence against women in India: Social, legal and alternative responses. PEOPLE: International journal of social sciences, 4(2), 212-228. https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.212228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.42.212228

Hansen, I. G., Jackson, V. W. Y., & Ryder, A. (2018). Religion and oppression: Cross-national and experimental investigations. Religion, brain & behavior, 8(4), 369-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1358208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1358208

Hasnain, A., & Srivastava, A. (2018). Social norms, gender roles and Time Use: Multigenerational households in India. Bridgewater Review, 37(2), 10-14. https://vc.bridgew.edu/br_rev/vol37/iss2/5

Haq, R., Klarsfeld, A., Kornau, A., & Ngunjiri, F. W. (2020). Diversity in India: Addressing caste, disability and gender. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 39(6), 585-596. DOI 10.1108/EDI-04-2020-0095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-04-2020-0095

Heise, L., Greene, M. E., Opper, N., Stavropoulou, M., Harper, C., Nascimento, M., ... & Gupta, G. R. (2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. The Lancet, 393(10189), 2440-2454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X

IGC (2020). The growing concern around violence against women in India – Where do we stand? IGC. Retrieved on: 7 April 2025 from: https://www.theigc.org/blogs/growing-concern-around-violence-against-women-india-where-do-we-stand

Kc, S., Wurzer, M., Speringer, M., & Lutz, W. (2018). Future population and human capital in heterogeneous India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8328-8333. http://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1722359115/-/DCSupplemental DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1722359115

Khaitan, T., & Norton, J. C. (2019). The right to freedom of religion and the right against religious discrimination: Theoretical distinctions. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17(4), 1125-1145. https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/17/4/1125/5710828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz087

Kothari, C., (2017). research methodology methods and techniques by CR Kothari. Published by New Age International (P) Ltd, Publishers, 91. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1358208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2017.1358208

Kumar, R., (2018). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/bitstream/handle/123456789/12576/Contents.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Mahajan, R., Gupta, P. & Singh, T., (2019). Massive open online courses: concept and implications. Indian pediatrics, 56(6), pp.489-495. https://www.indianpediatrics.net/june2019/489.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-019-1575-6

Nair, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2020). Intersectionality and relations between oppressed groups: Intergroup implications of beliefs about intersectional differences and commonalities. Journal of Social Issues, 76(4), 993-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12409

Newbigging, K., & Ridley, J. (2018). Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 219, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003

Reilly, N. (2017). Secularism, Feminism, and the Public Sphere. The Oxford Handbook of Secularism, 417-434. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988457.013.26

Sadanandan, A., (2018). Are Women in India Hampered by ‘Hindu Rate’ of Gender Discrimination? The Wire. Retrieved on: 7 April 2025 from: https://thewire.in/gender/an-unpleasant-truth-underlies-gender-discrimination-in-india

Saldanha, V., (2016). The power of religion over women in India. Global Sisters Report. Retrieved on: 7 April 2025 from: https://www.globalsistersreport.org/column/equality/power-religion-over-women-india-43236

Silva, E. O. (2019). Donald Trump's discursive field: A juncture of stigma contests over race, gender, religion, and democracy. Sociology Compass, 13(12), e12757. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12757

Vaishnav, M. (2019). The BJP in power: Indian democracy and religious nationalism. Retrieved August, 21, 2022. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/BJP_In_Power_final.pdf

Varghese, T. (2020). Women’s Political Participation and Leadership in India: Examining the Challenges. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 19(1), 111-125. https://www.vpa.ktu.lt/index.php/PPA/article/download/25228/13224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.19.1.25228

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Ghosh, B. (2021). UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL STIGMA RELATED TO RELIGION AND WOMEN IN INDIA AND IDENTIFYING WAYS TO PROMOTE DEMOCRACY. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 2(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v2.i1.2021.5059