THE EVOLUTION OF CLASSICAL POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: FROM PLATO TO MACHIAVELLI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i1.2023.3845Keywords:
Classical Political Theory, Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine, Machiavelli, Idealism, Realism, Political Ethics, Governance, Power, AuthorityAbstract [English]
Examining the evolution of classical political theories with respect to the contributions made by eminent political philosophers from Plato to Machiavelli, this study emphasising the importance of pragmatic administration, virtue, and constitutional government, contrasts Aristotle's political realism with Plato's idealism focused in the idea of philosopher-king and his vision of a desirable society. The study then moves to the Middle Ages, underlining the impact of St. Augustine's Christian political philosophy, which offered a dualistic perspective of heavenly and earthly government, therefore affecting the interaction between church and state. At last, the research revolves on Niccolò Machiavelli, who broke with the moralistic approaches of his contemporaries to advocate political pragmatism and realism. Machiavelli's ideas on power, leadership, and the division of ethics from politics in The Prince and Discourses on Livy placed modern political realism starting with statecraft and survival above idealistic elements. By means of a comparison of these thinkers, the research reveals how the idealistic notions of Plato gave way to Machiavelli's pragmatic approach whereby power and adaptability were vital for political success. The study also examines the different ways during these centuries power, morality, and authority influenced political systems. The study underlines how still today classical political philosophy shapes contemporary political institutions and methods. It finishes with highlighting the continuous relevance of these ideas in contemporary political discourse and provides suggestions for next study on the evolving character of political philosophy. This analogy highlights the basic contributions made by every thinker as well as the procedures guiding the foundation of present political philosophy.
References
Abbasi, A. N. (2021). Political Requisite of a Republic Apropos of Classical and Modern Theorist of Mixed Government. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 3(5), 375-392.
Aristotle (2021) Politics New Delhi: Fingerprint Publishing.
Baccelli, L. (2017). Political Imagination, Conflict and Democracy: Machiavelli’s Republican Realism. In D. Johnston et.al. Machiavelli on Liberty and Conflict. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 352-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226429441.003.0015
Barthas, J. (2010). Machiavelli in Political Thought from the Age of Revolutions to the Present. The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, 256-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521861250.017
Barthas, J. (2017). Machiavelli, The Republic and the Financial Crisis. In Johnston et. al. Machiavelli on Liberty and Conflict. 257-279. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. 257-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226429441.003.0011
Bartlett, R. C. (1994). Aristotle's science of the best regime. American Political Science Review, 88(1), 143-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944887
Brown, A. (2017). The intersection of religion and politics in medieval Europe. Academic Press.
Burnell, P. J. (1992). The Status of Politics in St. Augustine’s “City of God.” History of Political Thought, 13(1), 13–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26214187
Burns, A. (2021). Augustine on Administration: The Politics of Social Institutions in The City of God. The European Legacy, 26(1), 22-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2020.1793959
Davis, P. (2019). Plato’s ideal state: Philosophical foundations of governance. Routledge.
Fine, G. (1993). On ideas: Aristotle's criticism of Plato's theory of forms. Clarendon Press.
Foster, M. B. (1951). On Plato's Conception of Justice in the Republic. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 1(3), 206-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2217247
Harris, K. (2020). Aristotle’s mixed government: A blueprint for constitutional democracy. Oxford University Press.
Hueglin, T. O. (2008). Classical debates for the 21st century: Rethinking political thought. University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442606845
Johnson, C. (1988). Aristotle's polity: Mixed or middle constitution?. History of political thought, 9(2), 189-204.
Johnson, M. (2016). The impact of power and authority in political systems. Cambridge University Press.
Keyt, D. (2011). Plato on Justice. In Socratic, platonic and Aristotelian studies: Essays in honor of Gerasimos Santas (pp. 255-270). Dordrecht. Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1730-5_15
Machiavelli, Niccolò (2018). Discourses on Livy. Tr. Ninian Hill Thomson. India. Digireads.com.
Machiavelli, Niccolò. (2015). The Prince. New Delhi. Fingerprint Publishing.
Mommsen, T. E. (2017). St. Augustine and the Christian idea of progress: The background of the City of God. In Augustine and Modern Law (pp. 299-327). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315096735-14
Mulieri, A. (2021). Machiavelli, Aristotle and the Scholastics. The origins of human society and the status of prudence. Intellectual History Review, 31(4), 495-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2020.1766810
o'Daly, G. (2020). Augustine's City of God: a reader's guide. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841241.001.0001
Plato (2015). The Republic. New Delhi. Fingerprint Publishing.
Rahe, P. A. (2017). Aristotle and Modern Politics. The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 62(1), 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/aux010
Roberts, V. E., & Ogle, V. (2021). Politics and the earthly city in Augustine's City of God. Cambridge University Press.
Saint Augustine (2015). The City of God .Tr. Marcus Dods, Moscow: Roman Roads Media.
Santas, G. (2018). Economic inequalities and justice: Plato and Rawls. Philosophical Inquiry, 42(3), 2-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philinquiry2018423/411
Santas, G. (2018). Plato on inequalities, justice, and democracy. Democracy, Justice, and Equality in Ancient Greece: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives, 161-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96313-6_7
Scott, D. (2000). Plato's critique of the democratic character. Phronesis, 45(1), 19-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852800510108
Sedley, D. (2016). An introduction to Plato's theory of forms. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 78, 3-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246116000333
Smith, J. (2015). The role of civic virtue in democratic governance. Princeton University Press.
Taylor, A. (2013). Plato: The Man and His Work (RLE: Plato). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203101377
Taylor, L. (2018). Machiavelli’s realism: Power and pragmatism in The Prince. Harvard University Press.
Theodosiadis (2021). M. Niccolo Machiavelli: The Founder of Modern Political Thought. Serie iunie. Vol IX, Nr. 3 (33). 25.
Tvedt, O. E. W. (2021). Plato's Republic on Democracy: Freedom, Fear and Tyrants Everywhere (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University).
Vavouras, E. (2021). Machiavelli: Natural right and historicism. Polis. Journal of Political Science, 9(3 (33)), 5-24.
Woods, C. (2014). The Limits of Citizenship in Aristotle's Politics. History of Political Thought, 35(3), 399-435.
Zeitlin, I. M. (1997). Rulers and ruled: an introduction to classical political theory from Plato to the Federalists. University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442679498
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Durgesh Verma

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.