FROM FUN TO ADDICTION: HOW MICROTRANSACTIONS AND LOOT BOXES CONTRIBUTE TO GAMING DISORDER AND MENTAL HEALTH CHALLENGES IN FEMALE ADOLESCENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.3835Keywords:
Microtransactions;, Online, Gaming, Adolescents, FemaleAbstract [English]
The monetisation of gaming platforms has been researched over the period of time highlighting its limitations involving proper regulation. There are also investigations based on psychological effects that might generate interesting results. The study here attempted to investigate 600 female adolescent gamers from India who are actively a part of the online gaming world. These respondents belong to either government or private schools and colleges equally distributed over the sample. The investigation is undertaken using various statistical tools that help in identifying the perception of these gamers towards such microtransactions. The results showed that the female gamers have a lower level of engagement in real monetary transactions occurring in the virtual world. Majority of them are not involved in any kind of such transactions whereas the minimum of them agree to have bought a loot box. The perception towards such transactions among the gamers are found to be highly aware of the potential risk it might carry and always having a limitation to the spends on them. The gamers are found to be highly conscious of the financial consequences that can occur as a result of participating in such transactions and agree on adhering to them. There are no differences observed in the perception about microtransactions based on them att
References
Akbari, M., Bahadori, M. H., Bouruki Milan, B., Caselli, G., & Spada, M. M. (2021). Metacognitions as a predictor of online gaming in adolescents: Psychometric properties of the metacognitions about online gaming scale among Iranian adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 118, 106904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106904
Beltagui, A., Schmidt, T., Candi, M., & Roberts, D. L. (2019). Overcoming the monetization challenge in freemium online games. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(6), 1339–1356. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0350
Clement, J. (2024, June 5). Gaming monetization - Statistics & Facts. Statista .
Gibson, E., Griffiths, M. D., Calado, F., & Harris, A. (2023). Videogame player experiences with micro-transactions: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107766 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107766
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hunt, D. (2023). Microtransaction spending and problematic gambling of UK university call of duty gamers. International Gambling Studies, 23(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2022.2046843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14459795.2022.2046843
Jones, A. B. (2019). Personality and Dark Gaming: The relationships between Perfectionism, the Dark Triad, and Anti-Social Online Gaming Behaviour.
King, D. L., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2019). Video Game Monetization (e.g., ‘Loot Boxes’): a Blueprint for Practical Social Responsibility Measures. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(1), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0009-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-0009-3
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Small-Sample Techniques. The NEA Research Bulletin, 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Kristiansen, S., & Severin, M. C. (2020). Loot box engagement and problem gambling among adolescent gamers: Findings from a national survey. Addictive Behaviors, 103, 106254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106254
Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Internet Gaming Addiction: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 10(2), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-011-9318-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-011-9318-5
Leahy, D. (2022). Rocking the Boat: Loot Boxes in Online Digital Games, the Regulatory Challenge, and the EU’s Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. Journal of Consumer Policy, 45(3), 561–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09522-7
McCaffrey, M. (2019). The macro problem of microtransactions: The self-regulatory challenges of video game loot boxes. Business Horizons, 62(4), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.03.001
McLean, L., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Female Gamers’ Experience of Online Harassment and Social Support in Online Gaming: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(4), 970–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9962-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9962-0
Mistry, K. (2019). P(L)aying to Win: Loot Boxes, Microtransaction Monetization, and a Proposal for Self-Regulation in the Video Game Industry. 71 Rutgers U.L. Rev. , 537.
Neely, E. L. (2021). Come for the Game, Stay for the Cash Grab: The Ethics of Loot Boxes, Microtransactions, and Freemium Games. Games and Culture, 16(2), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019887658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019887658
Nicklin, L. L., Spicer, S. G., Close, J., Parke, J., Smith, O., Raymen, T., Lloyd, H., & Lloyd, J. (2021). “It’s the Attraction of Winning That Draws You in”—A Qualitative Investigation of Reasons and Facilitators for Videogame Loot Box Engagement in UK Gamers. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(10), 2103. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102103
Nwanosike, C. L., Ujoatuonu, I. V. N., Kanu, G. C., Ike, O. O., & Okeke, T. J. (2022). Social Bullying Among Undergraduates: The Roles of Internet Gaming Disorder, Risk-Taking Behavior, and Internet Addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.830794
Palmeira, M. (2021). The interplay of micro-transaction type and amount of playing in video game evaluations. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106609
Petrovskaya, E., & Zendle, D. (2022). Predatory Monetisation? A Categorisation of Unfair, Misleading and Aggressive Monetisation Techniques in Digital Games from the Player Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 181(4), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04970-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04970-6
Pratiwi, R., & Karneli, Y. (2020). The Contribution of Online Gaming and Peer Conformity to Student Bullying Behavior. Jurnal Aplikasi IPTEK Indonesia, 4(3), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.24036/4.34375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/4.34375
Puiras, E., Oliver, C., Cummings, S., Sheinin, M., & Mazmanian, D. (2022). Motives to engage with or refrain from gambling and loot box content: an exploratory qualitative investigation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 39(2), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10116-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-022-10116-8
Statista Research Department. (2024). Online Games - Worldwide. Statista.
Tomić, N. Z. (2019). Economic model of microtransactions in video games. Journal of Economic Science Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30564/jesr.v1i1.439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/jesr.v1i1.439
Zendle, D., Meyer, R., & Ballou, N. (2020). The changing face of desktop video game monetisation: An exploration of exposure to loot boxes, pay to win, and cosmetic microtransactions in the most-played Steam games of 2010-2019. PLOS ONE, 15(5), e0232780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232780 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232780
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Richa Yadav
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
