INNOVATIVE TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CHANGING WORLD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.2951Keywords:
Public Schools, Private Schools, Scholarly Accomplishment, Innovative Teaching Learning Process, Educational Level of Secondary School UnderstudiesAbstract [English]
The goal of comparison, a research paper that was functionally identical was utilized in the evaluation. The objective of the evaluation was to investigate academic performance of “secondary school students” depending on their participation in Innovative teaching learning Process. One hundred pupils from high school of Anand District were chosen according to a random selection method. During the process of analyzing the data, the researcher analyzed estimates for the “mean, the standard deviation, and the t-values”. According to the data, it is advised that children who attend public & private rural schools participate in more Innovative teaching learning Process. This is the case despite the fact that these children have poor academic performance. The outcomes of the study indicated that “secondary school students” who attended urban & non-public schools had a lower engagement rate in Innovative teaching learning Process while concurrently demonstrating higher academic achievement. This was the case despite academic accomplishment being higher.
References
Arip, M. M., & Yusof, B. (2002). Co-curriculum helps to reduce social problems among adolescence. In M. S. O. Fauzee, A. Yusof, & B. Yusof (Eds.), Cocurricullum: Implication and function (pp. 62-66). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Utusan Publication. 397- 401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746- 1561.2006.00132.x.
Best, J.W & Khan J.V. (2011). Research in education (10th edition). New Delhi: PHI learning Private limited, 121.
Broh, B.A. (2002). Linking extracurricular programming to academic achievement: who benefits and why? Sociology of Education, 75, 69-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3090254
Buch H.B. (Ed), Fourth survey of research in education, national council of Educational Research and Training. Vol-II, 1983-88. pp1075.
Christopher (1998) Sports and Self-Confidence Relationship. Retrieved May 16,2003fromhttp://www.msp.sports.bn/Cocurriculum/ departments.html.
Garret, H.E.(1969). Statistics in Psychology and Education. Bombay: Vakilfeffors and Simons, Pvt. Ltd. 7. HUMID HUSSAIN, Place of Literacy and cultural teaching learning Process in Training Colleges the Progress of Education, p 203.
Guest, A., & Schneider, B. (2003). Adolescents' extracurricular participation in context: The mediating effects of schools, communities, and identity. Sociology of Education, 76(2), 89-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3090271
Joseph, N. A. (2009). Exploring the relationship amid extracurricular participation & probability of employment for high school graduates. Master’s Dissertation, Georgetown University, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2008.10590802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2008.10590802
Katozai, M. A. (2004). Preparation for the PCS screening Test of Senior English Teacher. University Publishers Shop # 8–A Afghan Market, QissaKhwani Peshawar. pp. 132-135.
Kleese, Edward J. “Student Teaching learning Process: The Third Curriculum II”. National Association of Secondary School Principals (1994).
Lewis, Charla Patrice. “The Relation amid Innovative teaching learning Process with Academic and Social Competencies in School Age Children: A MetaAnalysis”. (Doctoral Dissertation, Texas A&M University, 2004). Pro Quest Dissertations and Theses, AAT 3189504.
Manaf, E. A., & Fauzee, M. S. O. (2002). The importance of co-curricullum in education system. In M. S. O. Fauzee, A. Yusof, & B. Yusof (Eds.), Cocurricullum: Implication and function (pp. 1-7). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Utusan Publication.
Massoni, E. (2011). Positive Effects of Extra Curricular Teaching learning Process on Students. ESSAI, 9. Retrieved August 12, 2013, from http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol9/iss1/27.
Morrissey K, (2005). The relationship amid out of school teaching learning Process and positive youth development: An investigation of the influences of communities and family. Adolescence, 40, 67-85.
Mukerji. S. N (1959), School Administration and function in India, J. C. Shah Acharya Book Depot, Baroda.
Schneider, B. (2003). Strategies for Success: High School and Beyond. Brookings Paper on Education Policy, 55-79. Retrieved March 03, 2024, from http://www.brookings.edu/research/journals/2003/ brookingspapersoneducationpolicy2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pep.2003.0022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pep.2003.0022
Swaminathan (1968), Drama for child development, NIE Journal P.No.42. NCERT, New Delhi.
Vidya Sagar, The importance of Games and Sports in the School curricular The Education Ministry of India.
White, A. M., & Gager, C. T. (2007). Idle Hands and Empty Pockets? Youth Involvement in Innovative teaching learning Process, Social Capital, and Economic Status. Youth and Society, 39(1), 75-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0044118X06296906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X06296906
William G. Camp, Participation in students’ teaching learning Process and Achievement Journal of Education Research. Virginia Tech, p. 2.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Parmar Kalpana Arjunsinh, Dr. Niraliben A. Soni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
