BRIDGING THE GAP: INDUSTRY-ACADEMIA COLLABORATION IN ARCHITECTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.iICoMABE.2024.2155Keywords:
University- Industry Collaboration, Employer Engagement, Live Project, Knowledge Transfer, Collaboration Gap, Architecture PedagogyAbstract [English]
This study delves into the ever-needed symbiotic relationship between industry and academia within the architecture domain, clarifying the benefits, and challenges of their collaboration. The multifaceted dimensions of industry-academia collaboration in architecture focuses on the interns' enhancing their understanding during training, fresh graduates' grasp of technical know-how at their first job, and the role of innovative industry partnerships in problem-solving and future building. Through a mixed-method research approach, the paper examines the perceptions of architectural interns and fresh graduates on the effectiveness of educational preparation, their technical know-how and their creative proficiencies encountered in their initial professional roles. Innovative partnerships between industry leaders and academic institutions are further evaluated to unveil the collaborative efforts in addressing contemporary architectural challenges and innovations. The findings suggest a significant discrepancy between academic training and industry requirements, indicating a need for curriculum reform and an enhanced framework for continuous collaboration. This study not only contributes to a deeper understanding of the transition from academic preparation to professional practice but also presents practical implications for curriculum development and strategic industry engagement.
References
Ackerman, P.L. 2009. “Individual Differences in Skill, Learning : An Integration of Psychometric and, Information Processing Perspectives.” Psychological Bulletin 102 : 3-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.102.1.3
Salama, A. M. (2008). A theory for integrating knowledge in architectural design education. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 100-128.
Brand, S. 1997. How Buildings Learn. London : Phoenix
Addis, B. (2007). Building : 3000 Years of Design Engineering and Construction. Phaidon Press.
Cameron Milton. 2004. The Jury’s Out : a Critique of the Design Review in Architectural Education. University of Canberra.
Carneiro, Alberto. 2001. The design, project of the person. Edition Drawings, Faculty of psychology and educational sciences, University of Porto.
Dovan, K. 1998. “Reliability in Context Analysis: Some Common Misconception and Recommendations.” Human Communication Research 30(3): 411-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/30.3.411
Floch, Jean-Marie. 1990. Semiotics, Marketing and Communication.Under the signs, Strategies. PUF. Col. Semiotic Forms. Paris, PUF.
OECD. 2011. Observer. 287Q : 13-14.
Papanek, V. 1985. Design for the Real World. London : Thames & Hudson
Pinto, Luis Moreira, et al. 2011. “Feeling Architecture : A way to start.” Advances in Environment, Computational Chemistry and Bioscience 328-332.
Sanders, Elizabeth B-N. and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design.” Co-Design 4.1: 05-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
Tafuri, Manfredo. 1988. Theories and History of Architecture. Texts Library University, Editorial Presence.
Teichmann, J. Ilvest Jr. 2007. “Integrated contact- and E-learning course in Managerial Psychology.” M. Iskander (Ed.), Innovations in E-learning, Instruction Technology, Assessment and Engineering Education, Springer. 243-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6262-9_42
Wines, James. 2000. Green Architecture. Tachen.
Zevi, Bruno. 1989. Know to See the Architecture. Dinalivros.
Agarwal, A. (2017). Architectural education in India: Challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Architecture, 3(1), 25-30.
Sharma, P., & Gupta, S. (2019). Growth of architectural education in India: Trends and challenges. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(9), 1217-1221.
Jain, R., & Chakrabarti, A. (2018). Architectural education in India: Addressing the gaps. Architectural Design Review, 4(2), 36-42.
Chakrabarti, A. (2020). Contextualizing architectural education in India. Journal of Architectural Education, 74(1), 89-96.
Gupta, N., & Sharma, S. (2016). Architectural education and professional practice in India: Bridging the gap. International Journal of Architectural Research, 10(2), 42-53.
Srivastava, A. (2021). The impact of globalization on architectural education in India. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 11(1), 25-32.
Bhatia, A., & Singh, J. (2020). Changing architectural vocabulary in India: Influences of globalization. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 32(2), 117-126.
Jain, S., & Gupta, R. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for architectural professionals in India. Indian Journal of Architectural Research, 5(1), 39-46.
Verma, S., & Gupta, A. (2018). Emerging technologies and their impact on architectural practice in India. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(3), 209-217.
Sharma, R., & Mishra, S. (2021). Skill development for architects in India: A roadmap for success. Journal of Architectural Education and Practice, 9(2), 53-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Srisoma Konduri, Bipasha Kumar , Deepashree Choudhury

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.