EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF INTERIOR DESIGN ON RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION IN PREFABRICATED AFFORDABLE HOUSING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.1046Keywords:
Interior Design, Aesthetics, Spatial Organization, Indoor Environment Quality, Occupants’ well-being, Residential SatisfactionAbstract [English]
This study explores the influence of interior design on residential satisfaction among residents of prefabricated affordable housing in Delhi, India. The research examines the relationships between three key design dimensions – Spatial Organization (SOR), Visual Elements (VEL), and Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) – and overall residential satisfaction (RSA). Findings based on structural equation modelling reveal that all three dimensions have significant positive impacts on RSA. However, Indoor Environmental Quality emerged as the strongest factor, followed by Spatial Organization. Visual Elements, while influential, held a slightly lesser weight in residents' overall satisfaction. These results suggest that residents prioritize practical considerations like thermal comfort, efficient layouts, and sufficient space for activities. This highlights the need for architects and designers to focus on Indoor Environmental Quality and Spatial Organization during the design of prefabricated affordable housing. Careful material selection with low chemical emissions and space-saving solutions are crucial for resident well-being. In conclusion, this research underscores the importance of considering all aspects of interior design to enhance residential satisfaction in affordable housing. Prioritizing Indoor Environmental Quality and Spatial Organization, alongside mindful material selection, can contribute significantly to resident well-being within these dwellings.
References
Addo, I. A. (2015). Assessing Residential Satisfaction Among low Income Households in Multi-habited Dwellings in Selected low Income Communities in Accra. In Urban Studies (Vol. 53, Issue 4, pp. 631–650). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015571055
Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. (2016). A Notional Appraisal of the Bases of Housing Satisfaction. International Journal for Housing Science and Its Applications, 40(2), 133–145.
Bluyssen, P. (2009). The Indoor Environment Handbook: How to make Buildings Healthy and Comfortable. In The Indoor Environment Handbook: How to Make Buildings Healthy and Comfortable. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774611
Buys, L., & Miller, E. (2012). Residential Satisfaction in Inner Urban Higher-Density Brisbane, Australia: Role of Dwelling design, Neighbourhood and Neighbours. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(3), 319–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.597592
de Kluizenaar, Y., Kuijpers, E., Eekhout, I., Voogt, M., Vermeulen, R. C. H., Hoek, G., Sterkenburg, R. P., Pierik, F. H., Duyzer, J. H., Meijer, E. W., & Pronk, A. (2017). Personal exposure to UFP in different micro-environments and time of day. Building and Environment, 122, 237–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.06.022
Deuble, M. P., & de Dear, R. J. (2014). Is it hot in here or is it just me? Validating the post-occupancy evaluation. Intelligent Buildings International, 6(2), 112–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2014.883299
Dinҫ, P., Özbilen, E., & Bilir, M. B. (2014). A Multi-dimensional Scale for Measuring Residential satisfaction (rs) in mass Housing Projects. Indoor and Built Environment, 23(6), 864–880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X13484619
Galster, G. C. (1985). Evaluating Indicators for Housing Policy: Residential Satisfaction vs Marginal Improvement priorities. Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 415–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333289
Galster, G. C., & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential Satisfaction: Compositional and Contextual Correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13(6), 735–758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916581136006
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I – method. In European Business Review (Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 63–76). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
Hui, E. C. M., & Yu, K. H. (2009). Residential Mobility and Aging Population in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 33(1), 10–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.02.001
Jain, S., & Bhandari, H. (2022). Affordable Housing with Prefabricated Construction Technology in India: An Approach to Sustainable Supply. ECS Transactions, 107(1), 8513–8520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/10701.8513ecst
Jiang, Y., Zhao, D., Wang, D., & Xing, Y. (2019). Sustainable performance of buildings through modular prefabrication in the construction phase: A comparative study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205658
Kline, T. J. B. (2005). Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385693
Latha, P. K., Darshana, Y., & Venugopal, V. (2015). Role of building material in thermal comfort in tropical climates - A review. In Journal of Building Engineering (Vol. 3, pp. 104–113). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.06.003
Lee, S., Alzoubi, H. H., & Kim, S. (2017). The effect of interior design elements and lighting layouts on prospective occupants’ perceptions of amenity and efficiency in living rooms. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(7), 1119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071119
Loftness, V., Hakkinen, B., Adan, O., & Nevalainen, A. (2007). Elements that contribute to healthy building design. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(6), 965–970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8988
Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait-multimethod data. In Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 177–198).
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.97.3.562
Mohammadi, M. P., Ahmad, A. S., Mursib, G., Roshan, M., & Torabi, M. (2014). Interior layout design parameters affecting user comfort in EE buildings. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences, 16(3), 579–587.
Mohit, M. A., & Raja, A. M. M. A. K. (2014). Residential satisfaction-Concept, theories and empirical studies. Planning Malaysia, 12(3), 47–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v12.i3.131
Pinquart, M., & Burmedi, D. (2003). Correlates of Residential Satisfaction in Adulthood and Old Age: A Meta-Analysis. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 23(1), 195–222.
Salleh, A. G. (2008). Neighbourhood factors in private low-cost housing in Malaysia. Habitat International, 32(4), 485–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.01.002
Sholanke, A., Fadesere, O., & Elendu, D. (2021). The Role of Artificial Lighting in Architectural Design: A Literature Review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 665(1), 012008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/665/1/012008
Singh, Mamata R., and S. D. Naskar. 2020. “Smart Construction: Case of ‘3-S’ Prefab Technology for Sustainable Mass Housing.” In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Springer, 301–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2545-2_26
Speare, A. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography, 11(2), 173–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2060556
Vardaxis, N. G., Bard, D., & Persson Waye, K. (2018). Review of acoustic comfort evaluation in dwellings—part I: Associations of acoustic field data to subjective responses from building surveys. In Building Acoustics (Vol. 25, Issue 2, pp. 151–170). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X18762687
Xu, X., Sunindijo, R. Y., & Mussi, E. (2021). Comparing user satisfaction of older and newer on-campus accommodation buildings in Australia. Facilities, 39(5–6), 389–410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/F-11-2018-0133
Xue, P., Mak, C. M., & Cheung, H. D. (2014). The effects of daylighting and human behavior on luminous comfort in residential buildings: A questionnaire survey. Building and Environment, 81, 51–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.06.011
Yang, S., Pernot, J. G., Jörin, C. H., Niculita-Hirzel, H., Perret, V., & Licina, D. (2020). Energy, indoor air quality, occupant behavior, self-reported symptoms and satisfaction in energy-efficient dwellings in Switzerland. Building and Environment, 171, 106618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106618
Yildirim, K., Akalin-Baskaya, A., & Hidayetoglu, M. L. (2007). Effects of indoor color on mood and cognitive performance. Building and Environment, 42(9), 3233–3240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.037
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shubham Jain, Harveen Bhandari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
