FUSION INDUCED
BY ENERGY-INTENSIVE MULTIFUNCTION CAVITATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH POSITRON
IRRADIATION
Toshihiko Yoshimura 1
1 Department
of Mechanical Engineering, Sanyo-Onoda University, 1-1-1 Daigaku-dori,
Sanyo-Onoda, Yamaguchi 756-0884, Japan
|
ABSTRACT |
||
This review summarizes the development of
multifunction cavitation technology and assesses future applications for this
process. The focus is on attempts to increase the surface strength and functionality
of various metals and plastics and to elucidate the conditions that can
induce nuclear fusion by cavitation. An experimental setup capable of
producing cavitation fusion based on positron-irradiated laser-assisted
high-field energy-intensive functional cavitation is described, having the
same basic structure as a prior device without positron irradiation. A
combination of water jet, ultrasonic and magnetic field energy sources has
been found to increase the sonoluminescence intensity and to theoretically
exceed the threshold required for the D-T fusion reaction. This paper
describes the incorporation of positron and laser energy sources to this
system as a means of further increasing the internal temperature and pressure
values of bubbles. Specifically, a Na-22 positron beam source was placed in
the upper part of the reaction vessel in the direction of the magnetic field
such that positrons were imparted to cavitation bubbles floating on the
surface of degassed heavy acetone. These positrons were partially annihilated
by interactions with electrons via the Compton effect to generate gamma-rays
and energy via the reaction e+ + e- → 2γ +
l.02 MeV. This energy promoted the D-T chain reaction D + T → 4He + n +
14 MeV to increase the probability of cavitation fusion. |
|||
Received 20 May 2023 Accepted 20 June 2023 Published 05 July 2023 Corresponding Author Toshihiko
Yoshimura, yoshimura-t@rs.socu.ac.jp DOI 10.29121/IJOEST.v7.i3.2023.520 Funding: This research
received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial,
or not-for-profit sectors. Copyright: © 2023 The
Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License. With the
license CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download,
reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work
must be properly attributed to its author. |
|||
Keywords: Cavitation
Fusion, Multifunction Cavitation, Positron Irradiation |
1. INTRODUCTION
Approximately 90 years have passed since the discovery
of the positron and more than 60 years since positrons were first used in the
study of condensed matter. During this time, there have been many studies regarding
the electronic structure of alloys, such as Fermi surfaces, that have taken
advantage of the properties of positrons, including research on lattice
defects. Important experimental methods within this field were developed in the
1980s, including two-dimensional angular correlation, positron beams Brandt et al. (1983), Schultz and Lynn (1988) Additional progress in
experimental techniques occurred in the 1990s. As an example, high-efficiency
two-dimensional angular correlation techniques were devised, making it possible
to perform higher resolution assessments of high-temperature superconductors
and semiconductor defects in shorter time frames. In conjunction with these
advancements, high-intensity, high-quality, low-speed positron beam
technologies were developed both in Japan and elsewhere. These beams have
allowed the analysis of near-surface defects and interfaces as well as the
determination of depth profiles. Other associated techniques have included slow
positron diffraction, positron annihilation Auger electron spectroscopy and
positron microscopy Ishii (1993), Puska and Mieminen
(1994), Asoka-Kumar et al. (1994), Dupasquier et al. (1995).
The positron (e+) is the antiparticle of
the electron. It is an elementary particle that has the same mass as an
electron and the same absolute charge value but the opposite charge sign.
Radioisotopes such as 22Na and 58Co are often used as
positron sources in laboratory work and the present study employed 22Na
for this purpose. The positrons resulting from the β+ decay of 22Na
(positron and neutrino emission (positive beta decay, positron decay) tend to
exhibit a continuous spectrum with a maximum energy of 540 keV and an average of
220 keV. In the case that fast (white) positrons are incident on a metal
surface, these particles will penetrate to a depth of approximately 0.1 mm and are
slowed down to thermal energy within a time span of approximately 1 ps. This phenomenon
generates thermal positrons. These thermalized positrons diffuse over a
distance of approximately 10-7 m in a crystalline metal before they
are annihilated by combining with one of the many surrounding electrons. The lifetime
of these thermal positrons in on the order of 100-200 ps
and these annihilations emit two gamma rays (γ1 and γ2),
each with an energy of 511 keV and moving in nearly opposite directions. Positrons
in bulk metals do not form specific bound states with electrons. However, in
molecular or ionic crystals, annihilation can also occur from the positronium
state. Because the positron has a positive charge, it will move away from the
positive ions that constitute a metallic crystal. Therefore, positrons (also
known as Bloch positrons) moving through a crystal containing conduction
electrons represent the primary annihilation partners for ions. Positrons that
arrive at sites at which positive ions are missing, such as atomic vacancies, microvoids (three-dimensional vacancy clusters less than 1
nm in size), voids or surfaces will be captured and disappear.
Room-temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) are widely used
and a number of methods for indirect observation of the microscopic properties
of these materials have been developed. A positronium (Ps) atom, meaning a
combined positron and electron, can act as a microscopic probe in this regard. Specifically,
a Ps atom in an RTIL will be in a different state than that in a molecular
liquid and the effect of temperature on this Ps atom is also likely to be
completely different. Positrons can be injected into a liquid from above its surface
and the effect of temperature on the positron lifetime near the liquid surface
and in the bulk can be assessed. On this basis, prior work has investigated the
state of Ps atoms in an RTIL together with the effect of temperature on the surface
structure of the IL Zhou et al. (2012).
Along with the development of techniques using positrons
to evaluate lattice defects on material surfaces as described above, the use of
these particles for surface modification to improve surface strength has also
progressed. Shot peening is a type of injection processing intended to impart
work hardening and compressive residual stress to a metal. These effects occur as a consequence of plastic deformation based on the collisions
of the metal with numerous small spheres made of steel or non-ferrous metals
and travelling at high speeds Okido et al. (2002). This technology has
previously been applied to prevent stress corrosion cracking of metals. In
initial studies, this effect was used to improve the tensile residual stress in
weld zones by generating compressive residual stress in the reactors and
internal structures of nuclear power plants. However, shot collection after
processing was found to be less than 100%. On this basis, water jet peening
(WJP) using water originally present in the reactor Saitou et al. (2003), Yoshimura et al. (2007) was
developed as a means of improving the process, and this technology has since
been applied at various nuclear power plants in Japan. Prior work by our group
also demonstrated that the corrosion resistance of steel could be improved
using mechanochemical cavitation technology (MC-WJP) Yoshimura and Sato (2014) based on the
use of an ejector nozzle and addition of a small amount of chemicals.
Various approaches to cold fusion research have been
proposed to date Yoshimura et al. (2018d). Taleyarkhan et al. carried
out ultrasonic cavitation trials using deuterated acetone (C3D6O)
and measured the amounts of tritium and neutrons generated from these processes Taleyarkhan et al. (2002), but other researchers
were unable to replicate these experiments. Our own group performed theoretical
and experimental studies aimed at assessing the possibility of bubble nuclear
fusion. This prior work developed a technique referred to as multifunction
cavitation in which ultrasonication is combined with water jet energy Yoshimura et al. (2016a), Yoshimura et al. (2016b), Yoshimura et al. (2018a), United
States US Patent No. 10,590,966: Yoshimura (2020). This technology was
subsequently used to investigate the bubble fusion phenomenon and it was
determined that fusion can occur in the case that the initial bubbles rapidly expand
and contract Yoshimura et al. (2018b), Yoshimura et al. (2018c).
It is possible to increase the internal temperature
and pressure of cavitation bubbles by applying concentrated ultrasonic
radiation from the periphery of a conventional WJC jet rather than from only
one direction Yoshimura et al. (2021b). This
technique was used to develop an energy-concentrating multifunction cavitation
system in which five ultrasonic transducers are arranged around a water jet.
Work by our group showed that a narrow 0.1 mm nozzle can replace the standard
0.8 mm nozzle to reduce the quantity of deuterated acetone used in the bubble
fusion process when performing surface modification. In other research, a magnetic
field and laser energy were also superimposed on the water jet Yoshimura et al. (2021a), Yoshimura et al. (2022b). The resulting
ultra-high-temperature, ultra-high-pressure cavitation surpassed the threshold
values of 1.0 × 1010 K and 1.0 × 108 MPa required for the
D-T nuclear fusion reaction Yoshimura et al. (2021a). Our group
additionally developed laser assisted magnetic field energy-intensive concentrated
multifunction cavitation (LMEI-MFC) apparatus Yoshimura (2023a) for the surface
modification of materials. The configuration of this apparatus was almost the
same as that of the LMEI-MFC fusion device, except that a vacuum was applied
for the purpose of degassing and either pure water or tap water could be
employed for surface modification. The LMEI-MFC fusion device initially
incorporated a 0.1 mm nozzle although a larger version with a nozzle diameter
of 0.8 mm and a flow rate of 7 L/min was also designed Yoshimura et al. (2021b), Yoshimura et al. (2021c), Yoshimura et al. (2021d), Yoshimura et al. (2021e), Ijiri et al. (2022a), Ijiri et al. (2022b), Ijiri et al. (2021a), ljiri et al. (2021b), Ijiri et al. (2021c), Ijiri et al. (2019). A larger water jet
nozzle diameter has been found to increase the cavitation diameter generated in
the water jet, although the flow rate is also increased. This is
disadvantageous because deuterated acetone is expensive and so the flow should
be as low as possible. As the cavitation diameter becomes smaller, the microjet
impact pressure during bubble collapse decreases but the impact pressure due to
the Lorentz force can compensate for this change. It should be noted that positrons
incident on condensed phases such as water and other liquids will have short
penetration depths because these substances do not contain the same defects found
in crystalline solids. The cavitation bubbles that rise to the surface of heavy
acetone during degassing are in a state in which the thin bubble walls are
balanced by the surrounding liquid pressure, the internal air pressure and the
Laplace force. The probability of passing positrons through the metastable thin
bubble walls is considered to be high.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the cavitation fusion apparatus developed by
our group. In this apparatus, the reaction vessel has a heptagonal pyramidal
shape that is similar to a widening cone. This shape was originally devised with
the intention of using a swirling nozzle Yoshimura et al. (2018d), Yoshimura et al. (2022f) to generate a swirling flow around a conical water jet as a means of reducing
pressure. The sonoluminescence output Yoshimura (2023a), Yoshimura et al. (2023b) resulting from the emission of photons from multibubbles
in the PLMEI-MFC (Positron and Laser assisted Magnetic field Energy-Intensive
concentrated multifunction cavitation) can also be monitored. As an alternative
to heavy acetone, a mixture of standard acetone and heavy acetone is injected
into the reactor at 40 MPa. The resulting
cavitation jet is subjected to ultrasonic irradiation around its periphery. The
bubbles in this system undergo isothermal expansion at low sound pressures and
rapid adiabatic compression at high sound pressures. This repeated expansion
and compression generates ultra-high-temperature, high-pressure cavitation. Consequently,
the liquid inside the bubbles is vaporized and subsequently undergoes thermal
decomposition such that free deuterium and oxygen atoms/ions are generated.
Although the system is operated under a vacuum, residual atmospheric nitrogen
and argon may be included in the liquid wall. Argon has a high ionization
energy but may nonetheless undergo ionization under these conditions as a
result of the concentrated energy that is employed. Placing powerful neodymium
magnets around the reaction vessel imparts a high magnetic field to the jet
such that the charged bubbles experience a Lorentz force and collide at high
speeds. Furthermore, in the case that the cavitating jet is irradiated with a
laser beam at a wavelength of 450 nm, ionization in the charged bubbles is
promoted due to multiphoton excitation. As a consequence of the synergistic
effect obtained from rapid contraction due to the adiabatic compression of the bubbles
and high-speed collisions between the bubbles, the pressure and temperature
required for nuclear fusion are exceeded. Collisions of deuterium atoms, D,
with one another generate helium atoms, He, neutrons, n, tritium atoms, T, and
protons. As D and T collide the reaction D + T → 4He + n + 14 MeV also occurs.
Disintegration is a phenomenon in which
high-speed particles are expelled from an atomic nucleus such that a different
element is produced. In some such cases, a neutron from the nucleus can change into
a proton in conjunction with the emission of an electron (e-) via
the process
(
Charged particles and electromagnetic waves will
interact with matter such that they lose energy (or velocity) and eventually
stop moving. Alpha rays (that is, beams of 4He, which comprises two
protons and two neutrons) readily ionize solid targets and so can be stopped by
a single sheet of paper. In contrast, β-rays can travel for several meters
in air depending on their energy and will penetrate plastic to a depth of
approximately 1 cm and aluminum to a depth of 2 to 4 mm. Gamma rays and X-rays
have much greater penetrating power than α-rays and β-rays, although again
this depends on the beam energy, and can travel several tens of meters in air. These
radiation types can only be stopped by thick plates of dense metals such as lead
or iron. Uncharged neutrons lose energy through collisions and are then
absorbed by interactions with matter. That is, neutrons lose energy (as
represented by velocity) by colliding directly with the atomic nuclei that make
up matter. Energy is most effectively lost when colliding with protons (meaning
hydrogen nuclei) of approximately the same mass.
The neutrons generated in such experiments were detected by a neutron
counter installed at the same position as the photon counter monitoring the
luminescence intensity from bubbles in the PLMEI-MFC apparatus shown in Figure 1. These neutrons were able to pass through obstacles
such as a thin iron plate but, in doing so, generated γ-rays that had to
be controlled. Therefore, the entire apparatus was surrounded by high-density
polyethylene containing diboron trioxide (B203),
which exhibits a high neutron shielding effect. Regulatory requirements
restricted the total effective radiation dose to 1 mSv or less per week. It
should be noted that, for this device to serve as a practical energy source,
the kinetic energy of the neutrons would be converted into thermal energy.
Figure 1
Figure 1 Positron Irradiation (PLMEI-MFC) Cavitation Fusion Equipment. |
As shown in Figure 2, a 22Na positron beam source is placed in the direction of the
magnetic field such that the positrons follow Fleming's left-hand rule and move
toward the surface of the degassed heavy acetone. These neutrons are
subsequently captured with a certain probability in cavitation bubbles that
float on the liquid surface. The image in Figure 3 demonstrates cavitation that appears on the surface of the acetone during
degassing. The apparatus employed a NA351 source provided by the Japan
Radioisotope Association. The disc-shaped source was sandwiched between films
made of the polyimide Kapton® (having a thickness of 7.5 μm)
and positrons were emitted in almost all directions. This source is typically used
for positron annihilation experiments in conjunction with a vacancy analysis
technique for materials such as metals. It has a half-life of 2.6 years
and emits β-rays at 546 keV in addition to γ-rays at 1.275 MeV. The
decay of 22Na to 22Ne causes positrons to be emitted
according to the reaction
The Na-22 source provided a radioactive output
of 1 MBq and so no special management protocols were required. Figure 4 plots the number of photons emitted per second as determined using
H9319-02 photon counting heads (Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.) with and without the
positron source under a blackout curtain blocking external light. In the
absence of positrons, the photon count was approximately 5500 photons/s but
increased to 14,000-48,000 photons/s when positrons were captured by the
counting heads. In the case that X-rays or γ-rays collide with electrons, additional
energy may be imparted to the electrons causing a change in the wavelength of
the original X-rays or γ-rays (meaning that these rays have lost energy).
This phenomenon is known as the Compton effect and is also responsible for the
partial annihilation of positrons in the present apparatus. After a positron
enters a bubble, it is immediately annihilated by combining with an electron,
leading to the generation of two gamma-ray photons according to the equation e++
e- → 2γ + l.02 MeV. This energy promotes the D-T chain reaction (D + T → 4He
+ n + 14 MeV). In addition, using a laser light port, a slow positron beam Brandt et al. (1983), Schultz et al. (1988) can be
applied to cavitation bubbles in the heavy acetone to generate cavitation
nuclear fusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Positron Irradiation (PLMEI-MFC) Cavitation Fusion Equipment (The Upper Flange Hidden). |
Figure 3
Figure 3 Cavitation Groups Observed on Acetone Surface During Degassing. |
Figure 4
Figure 4 Positron β+ Ray Emissions Over Time as Measured Using a Photon Counter. |
A radiation monitor (Iwatsu Electric Co., Ltd., Radiation Dose Monitor SV-2000) was used to measure gamma rays from the positron source. The measurement range was from 0.001 to 9.999 μSv/h with a minimum display resolution of 0.001 μSv/h. The background radiation level in the laboratory was determined to be 0.62-0.65 μSv/h. Prior work by Taleyarkhan irradiated heavy acetone and standard acetone held in a cylinder with neutrons both with and without cavitation. This work indicated that neutron irradiation in conjunction with the cavitation of deuterated acetone increased the amount of neutrons generated. However, the effects of factors such as reflection of the neutron beam were not fully evaluated Taleyarkhan et al. (2002), Seife (2002). In the present PLMEI-MFC apparatus, neutron generation from numerous bubbles in pure water was investigated based on the continuous flow of a liquid jet without neutron irradiation during the cavitation process. Although this study could not be experimentally approached because our laboratory has not a radiationshield environment, the luminescence intensity increased as the energy imparted to the system was increased such that the temperature and pressure of bubbles subjected to a water jet, ultrasonication and a magnetic field as energy sources theoretically exceeded the thresholds required for the fusion D-T reaction Yoshimura et al. (2021). Both laser and positron energy were added in these trials and further improvements in emission intensity were observed, suggesting that the internal bubble temperatures were further increased. In addition, multiphoton excitation was induced by the laser irradiation and the collision pressure between bubbles was therefore expected to be increased. Reactions between positrons and electrons in the bubbles promoted intra-bubble nuclear fusion, thus further raising the possibility of achieving cavitation fusion. Experimental verification of these phenomena is urgently required.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
None.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
None.
REFERENCES
Asoka-Kumar, P., Lynn, K. G.,
& Welch, D. O. (1994). Characterization of
Defects in Si and SiO2−Si Using Positrons. Journal of Applied Physics,
76(9), 4935–4982. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.357207
Brandt, W., & Dupasquir, A. (Eds.). (1983). Positron Solid-State Physics. In Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”. North-Holland Publishing Company.
Dupasquier, A., & Mills, A.. P. Jr. (1995). Positron Spectroscopy of Solid. IOS Press.
Ijiri, M., Ogi, T., Murakami, K., Horiguchi, S., & Yoshimura,
T. (2022a). Effect of Multifunction Cavitation Treated Carbon Steel
Surface on Fracture Toughness. Journal of Materials Research and Technology,
19, 3546–3553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.117
Ijiri, M., Okamoto, N., Okamoto, S., Ogi, T., Kikuchi, S., &
Yoshimura, T. (2022b). Characteristics of Oxide Film Formed on Cavitation-Treated
Steel Surface in Water. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 19,
1897–1905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.182
Ijiri, M., Yamaguchi, K., Kikuchi, S., Fujiwara, M.,
Nakanishi, Y., & Yoshimura, T. (2021a). Improvement in the Quality of
the Processed Material Surfaces Lies in the Moving of Nozzle in the Cavitation
Processing. Surfaces and Interfaces, 25, (101206). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101206
ljiri M, Kato, F.,
Maeda, D., Shimonishi, D., & Yoshimura, T. (2021b). Effect of
Compressive Residual Stress on Film Formed by Mechanochemical Multifunction
Cavitation Processing. ljiri M. Materials Science
Forum, 1016, 574–579. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1016.574
Ijiri, M., Yamaguchi, K., Kikuchi, S., Kato,
F., Kunieda, Y., Sakurai, H., Ogi, T., & Yoshimura, T. (2021c).
Formation of a Phosphoric Acid Compound Film on an AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Surface
Using Cavitation Bubbles. Surfaces and Interfaces, 25, 101194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101194
Ijiri, M., Shimonishi, D., Tani, S., Okada, N., Yamamoto, M.,
Nakagawa, D., Tanaka, K., & Yoshimura, T. (2019). Improvement of Corrosion
Resistance of Magnesium Alloy by High-Temperature High-Pressure Cavitation
Treatment. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture,
2(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.02.001
Ishii, A. (1993). Positrons at metallic surfaces. Trans. Tech. Pub, Aedermannsdorf.
https://d.docs.live.net/b569d3d9be6a9f15/01-Copy-Editing-Papers/IJOEST/Volume7Issue3/Formatted/07_IJOEST_520/Kato,
F., Maeda, D., Shimonishi, D., & Yoshimura, T. (2021b). Effect of
Compressive Residual Stress on Film Formed by Mechanochemical Multifunction
Cavitation Processing. ljiri M. Materials Science Forum, 1016, 574–579.
https:/doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1016.574Okido, S., Yoshimura, T., Enomoto, K.,
Saito, H., Morinaka, R., & Ishikawa, T. (2002).
Preventive effect of shot peening on stress corrosion cracking. Materials
Science Research International, 8(4), 193–198.
https://doi.org/10.2472/jsms.51.12Appendix_193
Puska, M. J., & Mieminen, R. M. (1994). Theory of Positrons
in Solids and on Solid Surfaces. Reviews of Modern Physics, 66, 841–897.
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.841
Saitou, N., Enomoto, K., Kurosawa, K., Morinaka, R., Hayashi, E., Ishikawa, T., & Yoshimura, T. (2003). Development of Water Jet Peening Technique for Reactor Internal Components of Nuclear Power Plant. J. Jet. Flow Eng., 20, 4–12.
Seife, C. (2002). Bubble Fusion Paper
Generates A Tempest in a Beaker. Science, 295(5561), 1808–1809.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5561.1808
Schultz, P. J., & Lynn, K. G. (1988). Interaction of Positron
Beams with Surfaces thin Films, and Interfaces. Reviews of Modern Physics,
60(3), 701–779. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.60.701
Taleyarkhan,
R. P., West, C. D., Cho, J. S., Lahey, R. T., Nigmatulin, R. I., & Block,
R. C. (2002). Evidence for Nuclear Emissions During Acoustic Cavitation.
Science, 295(5561), 1868–1873. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067589
Yoshimura, T. (2023a). Cavitation Fusion by Energy-Intensive
Multifunction Cavitation in a Strong Magnetic Field with Laser Light Excitation.
International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies, 7(2), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijoest.v7.i2.2023.492
Yoshimura, T., Noda, T., & Ijiri, M. (2023b).
Processing of magnesium alloy by energy-intensive multifunction cavitation in a
strong magnetic field with laser light excitation and associated
sonoluminescence. Results in Materials, 18, 100391: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2023.100391
Yoshimura, T., Fujinaga, S., & Ijiri, M. (2022a).
Modifying Resin Viscoelasticity by Multifunction Cavitation Processing in a
Magnetic Field. International Journal of Engineering Science Technologies,
6(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijoest.v6.i4.2022.364
Yoshimura, T., Watanabe, S., Ijiri, M., & Ota, S. (2022b).
Development of Processing Technology Using Extremely High Concentration
Cavitation Energy by Strong Magnetic Field. Results in Materials, 14, 100289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinma.2022.100289
Yoshimura,
T., Ijiri, M., & Sato, K. (2021a). Estimation of Nuclear Fusion
Requirements in Bubbles During Ultrahigh-Pressure, Ultrahigh-Temperature
Cavitation Promoted by Magnetic Field. International Journal of Engineering
Science Technologies, 5(6): 102-115, i6.2021.257. https://doi.org/10.29121/IJOEST.v5
Yoshimura, T., Sugae, Y., Ogi, T., Kato, F., & Ijiri, M.
(2021b). Development of Energy Intensive Multifunction Cavitation
Technology and its Application to the Surface Modification of the Ni Based
Columnar Crystal Superalloy CM18 6LC. Heliyon, 7(12), e08572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08572
Yoshimura, T., Nishijima, N., Hashimoto, D., & Ijiri, M.
(2021c). Sonoluminescence from Ultra-high Temperature and Pressure
Cavitation Produced by a Narrow Water Jet. Heliyon, 7(8), e07767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07767
Yoshimura, T., Iwamoto, M., Ogi, T., Kato,
F., Ijiri, M., & Kikuchi, S. (2021d). Peening Natural Aging of
Aluminum Alloy By Ultra-High-Temperature And High-Pressure Cavitation. Applied
Sciences, 11(7), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11072894
Yoshimura, T., Shimonishi, D., Hashimoto, D., Nishijima, N.,
& Ijiri, M. (2021e). Effect of Processing Degree and Nozzle Diameter
on Multifunction Cavitation. Surface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry,
57(1), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068375521010154
Yoshimura, T., Kumiko, T., Ijiri, M., & Nakagawa, D. (Inventors). (2022f). Assignee: Sanyo-Onoda City Public University, Patent no. JP7157994, Date of Patent: Mar 17,2022.
Yoshimura, T. (Inventor). (March 17, 2020). Assignee: Sanyo-Onoda City public university, Patent no. US, 10(590), 966 B2, Date of Patent, Method for Generating Mechanical and Electrochemical Cavitation, Method for Changing Geometric Shape and Electrochemical Properties of Substance Surface, Method for Peeling off Rare Metal, Mechanical and Electrochemical Cavitation Generator, and Method for Generating Nuclear Fusion Reaction of Deuterium, International PCT Pub. No.: W02016/136656, Pet Care Trust. No: PCT/JP2016/055016.
Yoshimura, T., Tanaka, K., & Yoshinaga,
N. (2018a). Nano-level Material Processing by Multifunction Cavitation.
Nanoscience and Nanotechnology – Asia, 8, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.2174/2210681206666160922164202
Yoshimura, T., Yoshiya, H., Tanaka, K., & Ijiri, M. (2018b).
Estimation of Bubble Fusion Requirements During High-Pressure, High-Temperature
Cavitation. International Journal of Advancements in Technology, 09(3), 1–9
1000206. https://doi.org/10.4172/0976-4860.1000206
Yoshimura, T., Yoshiya, H., Tanaka, K., & Ijiri, M. (2018c).
Estimation of Bubble Fusion Requirements During High-Pressure, Hightemperature
Cavitation. The 21st International Conference for Condensed Matter Nulear
Science, 3–8 June. Fort Collins, CO. https://doi.org/10.4172/0976-4860.1000206
Yoshimura,
T., Kumiko, T., & Ijiri, M. (2018d). Nanolevel Surface Processing of
fine Particles by Waterjet Cavitation and Multifunction Cavitation to Improve
the Photocatalytic Properties of Titanium Oxide. Intech Open Access.
Cavitation, ISBN: 978-1-78984-653-9. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.75271
Yoshimura, T., Tanaka, K., & Yoshinaga, N. (2016a). Development of Mechanical-Electrochemical Cavitation Technology. J. Jet. Flow Eng., 32(1), 10–17.
Yoshimura, T., Tanaka, K., & Yoshinaga, N. (2016b). Material processing by Mechanical-Electrochemical Cavitation p. 2016 Water Jetting: 223-235. BHR Group.
Yoshimura, T., & Sato, K. (2014). Study on Improvements of Corrosion Resistance of Steel Using Mechanochemical Cavitation. J. Jet. Flow Eng., 30(2), 10–17.
Yoshimura, T., Waseda, K., Sato, K., & Takarayama, N. (2007). Development of Water Jet Peening in Air and Application to Fretting Fatigue. J. Jet Flow Eng., 24(1), 11–17.
Zhou,
W., Chen, Z., Oshima, N., Ito, K., O’Rourke, B. E., Kuroda, R., Suzuki, R., Yanagishita,
H., Tsutsui, T., Uedono, A., & Hayashizaki, N. (2012). In-situ Characterization
of Free-volume Holes in Polymer thin Films Under Controlled Humidity Conditions
with an Atmospheric Positron Probe Microanalyzer. Applied Physics Letters,
101(1), 014102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4729425
This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
© Granthaalayah 2014-2023. All Rights Reserved.