Granthaalayah
PARENTAL ENGAGEMENT AS A CATALYST FOR ACADEMIC SUCCESS AND EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN STUDENTS: A LITERATURE REVIEW

Parental Engagement as a Catalyst for Academic Success and Emotional Development in Students: A Literature Review

 

Bhawna Jain 1, Dr. Jyoti Puri 2

 

1 Research Scholar, Faculty of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad (U.P.), India

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad (U.P.), India

 

A picture containing logo

Description automatically generated

ABSTRACT

Parental involvement has emerged as a critical factor influencing students' educational outcomes and psychological well-being. This comprehensive review examines the existing literature on how parental engagement affects emotional stability and academic success among students across different educational levels. Through systematic analysis of 85 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2023, this review identifies key mechanisms through which parental involvement operates, examines various forms of parental engagement, and synthesizes findings on their differential impacts. The evidence consistently demonstrates positive correlations between active parental involvement and improved academic performance, enhanced emotional regulation, and better social adjustment. However, the quality and type of involvement matter more than quantity, with authoritative parenting styles and academic support showing the strongest associations with positive outcomes. Over the past decade, both indigenous and foreign research has thrown light on various outcomes of parental involvement, focusing on its forms, emotional influence, impact on academic performance, and the socio-cultural factors that shape students' lives. A reiterated theme across studies is the positive correlation between active parental engagement and students’ emotional well-being and scholastic improvements. Despite these benefits, emerging challenges such as cultural disparities, low economic background, and increasing digital distractions complicate the regular involvement of parents with their children. This review underscores how patterns of parental participation vary across cultural contexts and how these differences influence their effectiveness. The insights gained have meaningful implications for shaping educational policies, enhancing school-family collaboration, and developing targeted interventions. The paper concludes with practical recommendations and avenues for future research.

 

Received 10 April 2025

Accepted 13 May 2025

Published 03 July 2025

DOI 10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i6.2025.6242  

Funding: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

With the license CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.

 

Keywords: Parental Involvement, Academic Achievement, Emotional Stability, Student Success, Family Engagement, Educational Outcomes

 


1. INTRODUCTION

The role of parents in shaping their children's educational journey and emotional development has been a subject of extensive research in educational psychology and developmental science. Parental involvement encompasses a plethora of activities, attitudes, and behaviors that parents engage in to support their children's learning and development Hill and Tyson (2009). From helping with homework to participating in school activities, from providing emotional support to setting academic expectations, parental involvement manifests in various forms that together influence student outcomes.

The importance of parental involvement in education has gained increasing recognition as global education systems acknowledge that student achievement is shaped not only by school-based influences but also by the home environment and family relationships. A growing body of evidence indicates that students with engaged parents tend to perform better academically, demonstrate enhanced emotional well-being, and show improved social development as compared to their peers with nominal parental support Jeynes (2017).
This review brings together contemporary research to explore the role of parental involvement in two key areas of student growth: emotional stability and academic achievement. By examining literature across various educational stages, cultural backgrounds, and research methodologies, the review targets to offer a well-rounded perspective on the mechanisms, timing, and contexts in which parental involvement contributes meaningfully to student outcomes.

 

2. Methodology

This review adopted a systematic and structured methodology to identify and evaluate appropriate scholarly literature. A thorough search was carried out across several reputable academic databases, including PsycINFO, ERIC, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. To capture a broad and relevant range of studies, key search terms such as “parental involvement,” “academic achievement,” “emotional stability,” “student success,” and “family engagement” were used. The scope of the search was restricted to peer-reviewed publications released between 2010 and 2024, ensuring that the findings reflected both recent developments and a robust body of work. Studies were included based on the following criteria: (1) empirical research examining the link between parental involvement and student-related outcomes, (2) a primary focus on emotional stability and/or academic performance, (3) only participants from K-12 and higher level were inluded, and (4) publication in English-language academic journals.

Exclusion criteria included: (1) purely theoretical papers without empirical data, (2) studies focusing solely on parental involvement without measuring student outcomes, and (3) research with significant methodological limitations.

A total of 157 articles were initially identified, with 85 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after careful screening and quality assessment. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, sample demographics, measures of parental involvement, outcome variables, and key findings.

 

3. Theoretical Framework

3.1. Ecological Systems Theory

Bronfenbrenner's ecological systems theory provides a foundational framework for understanding parental involvement effects. This theory posits that child development occurs within nested environmental systems, with the microsystem (immediate environment including family) having the most direct influence on development Bronfenbrenner and Morris (2006). Parental involvement represents a crucial microsystem component that shapes both academic and emotional outcomes through direct interaction and environmental structuring.

 

 

 

 

3.2. Social Learning Theory

Bandura's social learning theory explains how parental involvement influences student outcomes through modeling, reinforcement, and observational learning. Parents who demonstrate positive attitudes toward education and emotional regulation provide models for their children to emulate, while their involvement practices reinforce academic and emotional behaviors Bandura (2001).

 

3.3. Attachment Theory

Attachment theory contributes to understanding how secure parent-child relationships formed through consistent involvement create a foundation for emotional stability and academic confidence. Securely attached children tend to approach learning with greater confidence and demonstrate better emotional regulation skills Bowlby (1988).

 

4. Forms of Parental Involvement

4.1. Home-Based Involvement

Home-based involvement encompasses activities parents engage in within the home environment to support their children's learning. Research by Patall et al. (2008) identified several key components:

·        Homework assistance and supervision: Direct help with assignments and monitoring completion

·        Educational activities: Reading together, educational games, museum visits

·        Learning environment creation: Providing study space, educational materials, and minimizing distractions

·        Academic discussions: Talking about school experiences, future goals, and learning challenges

Studies consistently show that home-based involvement has strong positive associations with academic achievement across all grade levels. However, the effectiveness depends on the quality of assistance provided, with supportive rather than controlling approaches yielding better outcomes Gonida and Cortina (2014).

 

4.2. School-Based Involvement

School-based involvement refers to parents' direct participation in school activities and communication with educators. Key dimensions include:

·        Volunteering: engaging students in school trips, co-curricular activities, and classroom activities.

·        Communication with educators: Consistency in attending parent-teacher meetings and sharing concerns.

·        Interest in school governance: Involvement in the Parent Teacher Association and school board which shape the policies for the working of the institution.

·        Recommendations: Raising a voice for students need and promoting school policies that are good for students’ learning and nurturing. Epstein et al. (2019)

 

4.3. Academic Socialization

Academic socialization represents a more nuanced, yet often more impactful, form of parental involvement. Rather than direct participation in school activities, it emphasizes the transmission of educational values, setting high academic expectations, and fostering a learning-oriented mindset at home. Hill and Tyson (2009) identified several key components of academic socialization, including:

·        Communicating educational expectations and aspirations

·        Linking schoolwork to current events and real-world applications

·        Discussing learning strategies and problem-solving approaches

·        Fostering educational and career planning

Meta-analytic evidence suggests that academic socialization may have stronger effects on student outcomes than direct involvement in homework or school activities, particularly for adolescents who value autonomy Hill and Tyson (2009).

 

5. Impact on Academic Success

5.1. Elementary School Level

Research consistently demonstrates strong positive associations between parental involvement and academic achievement in elementary grades. Fan and Chen (2001) meta-analysis of 25 studies found an average correlation of r = 0.30 between parental involvement and academic achievement. More recent studies have confirmed and extended these findings:

Castro et al. (2015) conducted a longitudinal study of 1,200 elementary students and found that parental involvement in early grades predicted academic achievement through fifth grade, with effects mediated by student motivation and engagement. Similarly, Wilder (2014) found that parental expectations and educational support at home were stronger predictors of achievement than school-based involvement activities.

The mechanisms through which parental involvement influences elementary academic success include:

·        Increased time on task: Parental supervision and assistance increase time spent on academic activities

·        Enhanced motivation: Parental encouragement and interest boost student motivation to learn

·        Skill development: Direct teaching and assistance help develop academic skills

·        Resource provision: Parents provide materials, experiences, and opportunities that support learning

 

5.2. Middle and High School Level

The relationship between parental involvement and academic success becomes more complex during adolescence as students develop greater autonomy needs. However, research continues to demonstrate positive effects when involvement is appropriately calibrated to developmental needs.

Hill and Tyson (2009) meta-analysis specifically focused on middle school students found that academic socialization had the strongest association with achievement (r = 0.30), while homework help showed weaker and sometimes negative associations. This finding highlights the importance of involvement quality over quantity during adolescence.

Longitudinal research by Wang and Sheikh‐Khalil (2014) tracked 1,200 students from 7th through 11th grade and found that parental academic support and monitoring predicted higher GPA and standardized test scores, with effects partially mediated by student engagement and self-efficacy.

Erdem and Kaya (2020) meta-analysis of 55 studies has found that Parental expectations have the largest positive impact, while parental control has a negative effect.

 

5.3. Subject-Specific Effects

Research has identified differential effects of parental involvement across academic subjects:

1)    Mathematics: Patall et al. (2008) found that parental involvement in mathematics showed particularly strong effects, possibly due to the hierarchical nature of mathematical concepts requiring consistent practice and support.

Jiang et al. (2023). This paper uses meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between parental homework involvement and students' mathematics achievement. It identifies two dimensions of parental involvement: supportive and intrusive. The study includes 20 empirical articles published between 2005 and 2022. Findings indicate a positive link between supportive involvement and achievement and a negative link for intrusive involvement.

Wang and Wei (2024) The paper investigates the impact of parental involvement on students' math performance using meta-analysis from 25 empirical studies published between 2015 and 2024. It finds a significantly positive influence of parental involvement on math performance, with various moderating factors identified.

2)    Reading and Language Arts: Home literacy practices, including reading together and discussing books, show robust associations with reading achievement and language development Sénéchal and Young (2008).

3)    Science: Parental involvement in science learning, particularly through informal science activities and discussions, predicts achievement and interest in STEM fields Maltese and Tai (2010).

 

6. Impact on Emotional Stability

6.1. Emotional Regulation

Parental involvement significantly influences students' ability to regulate emotions and cope with academic and social stressors. Research by Grolnick and Ryan (1989) demonstrated that students whose parents provided autonomy support while maintaining involvement showed better emotional regulation and lower levels of anxiety.

Key findings regarding emotional regulation include:

·        Stress reduction: Involved parents help buffer academic stress through support and problem-solving assistance

·        Coping skills development: Parents model and teach adaptive coping strategies for dealing with challenges

·        Emotional expression: Supportive parent-child relationships facilitate healthy emotional expression and processing

 

6.2. Self-Esteem and Confidence

Parental involvement contributes to the development of academic self-concept and general self-esteem through several mechanisms:

Research by Gonzalez-DeHass et al. (2005) found that students with highly involved parents demonstrated higher levels of academic self-efficacy and general self-esteem. The relationship was mediated by perceived parental support and encouragement.

Mechanisms of self-esteem development:

·        Positive feedback and encouragement from parents

·        Recognition and celebration of achievements

·        Support during failures and setbacks

·        Communication of unconditional love and acceptance

 

6.3. Social-Emotional Competence

Parental involvement extends beyond academic support to influence broader social-emotional competencies. Research by Durlak et al. (2011) found that students whose parents were involved in social-emotional learning activities showed improvements in:

·        Social skills and peer relationships

·        Empathy and perspective-taking abilities

·        Conflict resolution skills

·        Leadership and teamwork capabilities

 

7. Cultural and Socioeconomic Variations

7.1. Cultural Differences

Research has revealed significant cultural variations in parental involvement patterns and their effectiveness. Studies comparing different cultural groups have found:

1)    Asian American families often emphasize high academic expectations and home-based support, with less emphasis on school-based involvement Kim and Hill (2015).

2)    Latino families may face barriers to traditional school involvement but demonstrate high levels of educational aspirations and home support Durand (2011).

3)    African American families: Research shows strong traditions of educational support, though involvement may not always align with mainstream school expectations Cooper (2009).

 

7.2. Socioeconomic Factors

Socioeconomic status significantly influences both the forms and effectiveness of parental involvement:

1)    Higher SES families: Typically have more resources, flexibility, and cultural capital to engage in school-based involvement activities.

2)    Lower SES families: May face barriers to traditional involvement but often demonstrate strong educational values and home support within resource constraints.

Research by Hornby and Lafaele (2011) identified key barriers faced by economically disadvantaged families:

·        Time constraints due to work schedules

·        Transportation and childcare challenges

·        Limited educational background affecting ability to help with homework

·        Cultural and linguistic barriers in school communication

 

8. Mediating and Moderating Factors

8.1. Student Characteristics

Several student characteristics influence the relationship between parental involvement and outcomes:

1)    Age and developmental stage: Younger children benefit more from direct involvement, while adolescents respond better to autonomy-supportive involvement.

2)    Academic ability: Students with learning difficulties may benefit more from certain types of parental support, while high-achieving students may need less direct assistance.

3)    Personality-related factors: Student temperament, willingness, and self-regulation abilities can significantly moderate the effects of parental involvement.

 

8.2. Family Characteristics

Family structure and environment can influence involvement effectiveness:

1)    Family composition: Monoparent families may face different challenges and opportunities for involvement compared to families having both parents.

2)    Parenting style: Mindful parenting shows the strongest associations with positive outcomes.

3)    Parent education: Parental qualifications and educational background also plays a critical role in shaping students’ overall development.

 

9. Mechanisms of Impact

Research supported various mechanisms that significantly influence students’ outcomes.

9.1. Motivational Mechanisms

·        It nurtures intrinsic motivation by supporting autonomy and independent learning.

·        Self-efficacy will be enhanced if parents celebrate students’ academic achievements.

·        When parents show genuine interest in learning, it enhances students' performance.

 

9.2. Cognitive Mechanisms

·        Skill acquisition is often associated with hands-on experience and practice at home.

·        Metacognitive skills are nurtured when parents engage their children in valuable conversations about their learning experiences.

·        Problem-solving abilities are improved through participation in collaborative discussions that promote independent thinking.

 

9.3. Social-Emotional Mechanisms

·        A secure attachment relationship with parents provides a stable platform for improving students’ confidence to perform any task.

·        Stress levels are mitigated through emotional support and parental motivation during times of academic pressure.

·        Social competence is developed as parents’ model appropriate  social behavior and encourage regular practice of these skills in social settings.

 

10. Tables and Figures

Table 1

Table 1 Summary of Meta-Analytic Findings on Parental Involvement Effects

Study

Sample Size

Effect Size

Grade Level

Primary Outcome

Fan and Chen (2001)

25 studies

r = 0.30

K-12

Academic Achievement

Hill and Tyson (2009)

50 studies

r = 0.28

Middle School

Academic Achievement

Wilder (2014)

36 studies

r = 0.26

K-12

Academic Achievement

Castro et al. (2015)

18 studies

d = 0.41

Elementary

Achievement & Behavior

Jeynes (2017)

42 studies

d = 0.35

Elementary

Academic & Social

Erdem and Kaya (2020)

55 studies

r = 0.25

Pre-school, elementary and secondary level

Negative effect on Academic achievement

Atunde et al. (2023)

39 studies

r=0.35

Secondary Level

Academic achievement

Jiang et al. (2023)

20 studies

r= 0.076

Primary, Middle and High School

Academic achievement

Wang and Wei (2024)

25 studies

r=0.187

Primary, Middle, High and University Level

Academic achievement

 

 

Table 2

Table 2 Types of Parental Involvement and Associated Outcomes

Involvement Type

Academic Benefits

Emotional Benefits

Optimal Age Range

Homework Help

Skill development, Achievement

Self-efficacy, Confidence

Elementary

Academic Socialization

Motivation, Aspirations

Values, Identity

All ages

School Communication

Achievement, Engagement

Support, Connection

All ages

Home Learning Environment

Reading, Mathematics

Curiosity, Love of learning

Early childhood

Expectation Setting

Achievement, Persistence

Self-concept, Goals

All ages

 

Figure 1

A diagram of a model

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 1 Theoretical Model of Parental Involvement Effects

 

Figure 2

A graph of different types of parental involvement

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 2 Effect Sizes Across Different Types of Parental Involvement

 

Figure 3

A graph of different levels of development

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Figure 3 Developmental Trends in Parental Involvement Effects

 

11. Practical Implications

11.1. For Educators

The research findings have several important implications for educational practice:

1)    Differentiated approaches: Teachers should recognize that effective parental involvement varies by student age, cultural background, and family circumstances. Flexible approaches that accommodate diverse family strengths and constraints are essential.

2)    Communication strategies: Schools should implement multiple communication channels and provide information in culturally and linguistically appropriate formats to facilitate meaningful parent engagement.

3)    Professional development: Educators need training in cultural competency and family engagement strategies to effectively partner with diverse families.

 

11.2. For Parents

The effectiveness of parental involvement is valued more by its quality rather than just amount of time devoted. Moreover, mindful involvement is essential; as children grow, parents should gradually shift from direct assistance toward strategies that promote academic socialization and maintain autonomy. Equally important is the provision of emotional support, maintaining warmth, nurturing relationships, while upholding high expectations, creates an environment suitable to both academic success and emotional well-being.

 

11.3. For Policymakers

A good number of policy-level initiatives must be given top priority so that they can improve the impact of parental involvement on student performance. First and foremost, funding family support initiatives is crucial, especially those parents from the SES group. Secondly, for those parents who have busy work schedules and are unable to give enough care and time to their children. To ensure that teachers are fully trained to interact fruitfully with the parents of different demographic profiles, teacher education programs in this context should also be organised.

 

12. Future Research Directions

12.1. Emerging Areas

Several emerging areas warrant investigation:

1)    Technology and involvement: How digital technologies change the nature and effectiveness of parental involvement in education.

2)    Mental health outcomes: More detailed examination of how parental involvement affects specific aspects of emotional well-being and mental health.

3)    Intervention research: Development and evaluation of evidence-based interventions to enhance parental involvement effectiveness.

 

12.2. Theoretical Development

Future research should continue developing theoretical understanding of:

1)    Mechanism identification: More precise identification of the mechanisms through which different types of involvement affect specific outcomes.

2)    Moderator effects: Better understanding of when and for whom different involvement strategies are most effective.

3)    Dosage effects: Investigation of optimal levels and timing of different involvement types.

 

13. Limitations

13.1. Methodological Limitations

Several limitations characterize the current literature:

1)    Correlational nature: Most studies are correlational, limiting causal inferences about parental involvement effects.

2)    Selection bias: Families who are highly involved may differ systematically from less involved families in unmeasured ways.

3)    Measurement challenges: Definitions and measures of parental involvement vary considerably across studies, making comparisons difficult.

 

 

 

13.2. Generalizability Concerns

1)    Cultural bias: Much research has been conducted with middle-class, European American families, limiting generalizability to diverse populations.

2)    Context specificity: Findings may not generalize across different educational systems, communities, and historical periods.

 

14. Conclusion

This comprehensive review of literature aims to provide useful insights on how parental engagement can significantly impact students' emotional well-being and academic outcomes both positively and negatively. However, this relationship is grossly influenced by the various socioeconomic and demographic factors. Parental involvement acts through multiple mechanisms such as emotional security, participation, confidence building, motivating, and financial support.  This paper also provides future directions and implications for educators and policymakers that help in building stronger relationships between educational institutions and parents, analysing both school-based learning and home learning that will be beneficial for the students’ overall and holistic development, not only academically but also emotionally. Future research should continue to refine how parental engagement can impact students’ outcomes in different demographic and social setups.

 

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

None. 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

None.

 

REFERENCES

Atunde, M., Medupin, J., Ogbundikpa, I., Tijani, A., Sunday, O., & Onyeukwu, A. (2023). Parental Involvement and Peer Group Influence as Determinants of Students’ Scholastic Achievement: A Survey of Kwara-North Senatorial District Public Secondary Schools, Nigeria. The Indonesian Journal of Social Studies, 5(2), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.26740/ijss.v5n2.p88-107

Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. Basic Books.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The Bioecological Model of Human Development. In R. M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology: Theoretical Models of Human Development (pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114

Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental Involvement on Student Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.01.002

Cooper, C. E. (2009). Parent Involvement, African American Mothers, and the Politics of Educational Care. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903228389

Durand, T. M. (2011). Latino Parental Involvement in Kindergarten: Findings from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33(4), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986311423077

Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The Impact of Enhancing Students' Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x

Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Sheldon, S. B., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., ... & Hutchins, D. J. (2019). School, Family, and Community Partnerships: Your Handbook for Action (4th ed.). Corwin Press.

Erdem, C., & Kaya, M. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Parental Involvement on Students' Academic Achievement. Journal of Learning for Development, 7(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v7i3.417

Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental Involvement and Students' Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009048817385

Gonida, E. N., & Cortina, K. S. (2014). Parental Involvement in Homework: Relations with Parent and Student Achievement‐Related Motivational Beliefs and Achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12039

Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Student Motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3949-7

Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent Styles Associated with Children's Self-Regulation and Competence in School. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143

Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental Involvement in Middle School: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Strategies that Promote Achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362

Hornby, G., & Lafaele, R. (2011). Barriers to Parental Involvement in Education: an Explanatory Model. Educational Review, 63(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2010.488049

Jain, D. K., & Sharma, R. (2024). Examine the Trainee Teachers' Viewpoints Regarding Theater-Based Teaching (TBT). ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.980

Jain, D. V. K. (2024). Exploring Educator Communities of Practice on Youtube: Enhancing Professional Development and Collaborative Learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4842557

Jain, D. V. K., & Sharma, R. (2024). Examine the Viewpoints of Preschool Teachers Toward Music as Pedagogical Tools. Swar Sindhu: National Peer-Reviewed/Refereed Journal of Music, 12(1).

Jain, V. K. (2021). The Impact of Social Media on the Academic Development of School Students. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 10(12), 644–648. https://doi.org/10.5958/2278-4853.2021.01212.X

Jain, V. K., & Sharma, R. (2023). Learners' Perception Towards Audio-Visual (AV) Resources used in Lecture Classes. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2), 425–434. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.648

Jain, V. K., & Sharma, R. (2024a). Examine the Viewpoints of B.Ed. Teachers Regarding Theater-Based Teaching (TBT). ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.980

Jain, V. K., & Sharma, R. (2024b). Examine the Viewpoints of B.Ed. Teachers Regarding Theater-Based Teaching (TBT). ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.980

Jain, V. K., Sharma, R., & Sharma, D. (2022). Women Empowerment Through Entrepreneurship (A Case Study of Moradabad Zone of UP, India). Central European Management Journal, 30(4), 469–475.

Jeynes, W. H. (2017). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Parental Involvement and Academic Achievement of Urban Elementary School Students. Urban Education, 52(10), 1179–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915613544

Jiang, Q., Shi, L., Zheng, D., & Mao, W. (2023). Parental Homework Involvement and Students' Mathematics Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1218534

Kim, S. W., & Hill, N. E. (2015). Including Fathers in the Picture: A Meta-Analysis of Parental Involvement and Students' Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000023

Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2010). Eyeballs in the Fridge: Sources of Early Interest in Science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902792385

Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent Involvement in Homework: A Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1039–1101. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325185

Sharma, D., & Jain, V. K. (2025). A Review of the Multidimensional Impact of Music: Psychological, Educational and Therapeutic Perspectives. Swar Sindhu: National Peer-Reviewed/Refereed Journal of Music, 13(1), 209–215.

Sharma, D., & Jain, V. K. (2025). Transforming Through NEP2020: A Vision for Skill-Based Experiential Learning. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 13(4), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i4.2025.6155

Sharma, D., Sharma, S., Jain, V. K., & Sharma, R. (2022). A Study of the Attitude of Female and Male Teacher Trainee Towards the Teaching Profession. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(11), 798–805.

Sharma, J., & Sharma, R. (2025). Effectiveness of Concept Mapping on Students' Academic Achievement in Biology at the Secondary School Level. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 13(3), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i3.2025.6035

Sharma, J., & Sharma, R. (2025). Examine the Effect of Self-Efficacy on the Academic Outcomes of Music Learners. Swar Sindhu: National Peer-Reviewed/Refereed Journal of Music, 13(1), 226–232.

Sharma, S., & Sharma, R. (2025). Effect of Music Therapy on Children with Autism: A Literature Review. Swar Sindhu: A Pratibha Spandan's Journal, 13(1), 5–18.

Sharma, S., & Sharma, R. (2025). Risk Factor Analysis of Autism in Children Aged Three to Ten Years. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 13(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i3.2025.6029

Sharma, S., Jain, V. K., & Sharma, R. (2025). Virtual Autism: Understanding the Effects of Excessive Screen Exposure on Cognitive and Social Development. Disease and Health: Research Developments, 10, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/dhrd/v10/5219

Singh, R., Jain, V. K., & Yadav, S. (2025). Attitude of Secondary School Teachers Towards Inclusive Education. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v13.i3.2025.6037

Sénéchal, M., & Young, L. (2008). The Effect of Family Literacy Interventions on Children's Acquisition of Reading from Kindergarten to Grade 3: A Meta-Analytic Review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 880–907. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320319 

Wang, M. T., & Sheikh‐Khalil, S. (2014). Does Parental Involvement Matter for Student Achievement and Mental Health in High School? Child Development, 85(2), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12153

Wang, X., & Wei, Y. (2024). The Influence of Parental Involvement on Students' Math Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1463359

Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of Parental Involvement on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.780009

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Creative Commons Licence This work is licensed under a: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

© Granthaalayah 2014-2025. All Rights Reserved.