NATURAL BIOPRINTING: TEXTILE SOURCES AND PROPERTIES

Authors

  • Ashok Athalye Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India
  • Supriya Sanatkumar Sarkar Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v13.i1.2026.1728

Keywords:

Printability, Biomimicry, Biomaterials, Tissue engineering, Scaffold

Abstract

The field of bioprinting has witnessed a variety of materials attempting to establish themselves as suitable bioinks. In the medical field, bioink has found its application, but it still faces challenges in striking a balance between biological requirements and mechanical properties. Synthetic materials offer the desired mechanical properties due to controlled production, but they lack biocompatibility. These materials, even though they have an upper hand in production, fall short in their ability to interact with the complex in situ environment. Tackling this issue, bioprinting has been revolutionized by natural biopolymers due to their exceptional biocompatibility. Acquired from natural sources, materials such as cellulose, keratin, silk fibroin, alginate, and collagen can easily mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM). Properties required for bioink, such as mechanical strength, biological properties, and rheological behavior, play a crucial role in complex structural bioprinting. Easily tunable to requirements, these materials can provide a range of architects with inherent cellular adhesion, differentiation, and proliferation properties. Despite their weak mechanical strength and inherent rapid biodegradability, continuous improvements in the blending, crosslinking, and modification of biopolymers have significantly enhanced their printability and structural robustness, making it easier to create biologically active constructs and functional scaffolds. This review will discuss these properties and how natural biopolymers can be an ideal candidate for bioink in a wide range of applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bedell, M. L., Melchiorri, A. J., Aleman, J., Skardal, A., and Mikos, A. G. (2020). A High-Throughput Approach to Compare the Biocompatibility of Candidate Bioink Formulations. Bioprinting, 17, e00068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00068

Borah, A., and Kumar, D. S. (2022). Overcoming the Barriers of Two-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems with Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems: Techniques, Drug Discovery, and Biomedical Applications. In Biomedical Product and Materials Evaluation (179–229). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823966-7.00003-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823966-7.00003-7

Clark, C. C., Aleman, J., Mutkus, L., and Skardal, A. (2019). A Mechanically Robust Thixotropic Collagen and Hyaluronic Acid Bioink Supplemented with Gelatin Nanoparticles. Bioprinting, 16, e00058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2019.e00058

Feroz, S., Muhammad, N., Ratnayake, J., and Dias, G. (2020). Keratin-Based Materials for Biomedical Applications. Bioactive Materials, 5, 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.007

GhavamiNejad, A., Ashammakhi, N., Wu, X. Y., and Khademhosseini, A. (2020). Crosslinking Strategies for 3D Bioprinting of Polymeric Hydrogels. Small, 16, 2002931. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202002931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202002931

Ghosh, J., Rupanty, N. S., Asif, T. R., Noor, T., Islam, T., and Reukov, V. (2025). Advancing Biomedical Applications: Integrating Textile Innovations with Tissue Engineering. Biomedical Materials, 20, 042002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/adda81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/adda81

Habib, A., Sarah, R., Tuladhar, S., Khoda, B., and Limon, S. M. (2024). Modulating Rheological Characteristics of Bio-Ink with Component Weight and Shear Rate for Enhanced Bioprinted Scaffold Fidelity. Bioprinting, 38, e00332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00332 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00332

Kumar, V. B., Tiwari, O. S., Finkelstein-Zuta, G., Rencus-Lazar, S., and Gazit, E. (2023). Design of Functional RGD Peptide-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. Pharmaceutics, 15, 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020345

Mallakpour, S., Azadi, E., and Hussain, C. M. (2021). State-of-the-art of 3D Printing Technology of Alginate-Based Hydrogels—An Emerging Technique for Industrial Applications. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 293, 102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2021.102436

Osidak, E. O., Kozhukhov, V. I., Osidak, M. S., and Domogatsky, S. P. (2024). Collagen as Bioink for Bioprinting: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Bioprinting, 6, 270. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i3.270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i3.270

Prakash, J. N., Sarkar, S. S., and Kandasubramanian, B. (2023). Emerging Strategies in Stimuli-Responsive Silk Architectures. Macromolecular Bioscience, 23, 2200573. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202200573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.202200573

Rijal, G. (2023). Bioinks of Natural Biomaterials for Printing Tissues. Bioengineering, 10, 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060705

Schwab, A., Levato, R., D’Este, M., Piluso, S., Eglin, D., and Malda, J. (2020). Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting. Chemical Reviews, 120, 11028–11055. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00084

Sharma, C., Raza, M. A., Purohit, S. D., Pathak, P., Gautam, S., Corridon, P. R., and Han, S. S. (2025). Cellulose-Based 3D Printing Bio-Inks for Biomedical Applications: A Review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 305, 141174. https://doi.org/10.1016table/j.ijbiomac.2025.141174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141174

Suntornnond, R., An, J., and Chua, C. K. (2017). Roles of Support Materials in 3D Bioprinting – Present and Future. International Journal of Bioprinting, 3, 83–86. https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.01.006

Theus, A. S., Ning, L., Hwang, B., Gil, C., Chen, S., Wombwell, A., Mehta, R., and Serpooshan, V. (2020). Bioprintability: Physiomechanical and Biological Requirements of Materials for 3D Bioprinting Processes. Polymers, 12, 2262. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12102262

Wu, C. A., Zhu, Y., and Woo, Y. J. (2023). Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Bioengineering, 10, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10070842

Yang, Y., Jia, Y., Yang, Q., and Xu, F. (2022). Engineering Bio-Inks for 3D Bioprinting Cell Mechanical Microenvironment. International Journal of Bioprinting, 9, 632. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.632

Yao, B., Hu, T., Cui, X., Song, W., Fu, X., and Huang, S. (2019). Enzymatically Degradable Alginate/Gelatin Bioink Promotes Cellular Behavior and Degradation in Vitro and in Vivo. Biofabrication, 11, 045020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab38ef DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab38ef

Downloads

Published

2026-01-17

How to Cite

athalye, ashok, & Sarkar, S. S. (2026). NATURAL BIOPRINTING: TEXTILE SOURCES AND PROPERTIES. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 13(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v13.i1.2026.1728