SOCIAL MEDIA ACTIVISM BY MILLENNIALS SHAPING PUBLIC OPINION ON SOCIAL ISSUES

Authors

  • Dr. Joy Samuel Dhanraj. G Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Loyola College, Chennai
  • Dyaaneshwar S Undergraduate Student, Department of Business Administration, Loyola College, Chennai.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i(4SE).2025.1590

Keywords:

Social Media Activism, Millennial, Real-World Action, Beliefs

Abstract

This study examines the role of social media activism by millennials shaping public opinion with a focus on social pressure, group belonging, and long-term engagement. It aims to understand whether online activism translates into real-world actions and how factors like normative social influence, collective action, and repeated exposure impact participation. A quantitative research design was used, collecting responses from millennials via a Likert-scale survey. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and regression modeling were conducted to identify key predictors of social media activism engagement. Cronbach’s Alpha was used to assess reliability.
The results indicate that social pressure and group belonging significantly influence millennials’ engagement in social media activism. Normative social influence and alignment with peer groups were strong predictors of participation. However, offline action and changing long-held beliefs were not significant, suggesting that social media activism raises awareness but does not necessarily translate into real-world action or long-term belief changes. The model explained 20.4% of the variance in social media activism’s impact on beliefs.
The study is limited by focuses exclusively on millennials, limiting generalizability to other age groups. The research identifies correlations but does not establish reason. Future studies should explore longitudinal effects, cross-cultural differences, and platform-specific activism trends. Organizations and advocacy groups can use these findings to enhance engagement strategies by leveraging social pressure and peer alignment. Campaigns should focus on creating a sense of community to encourage participation while recognizing that online activism alone may not drive offline actions.
This study contributes to the growing discourse on digital activism by highlighting the psychological and social drivers of participation. It provides insights into why millennials engage in social media activism and whether online movements create meaningful impact beyond digital spaces. The findings help bridge the gap between social media engagement and real-world activism, offering valuable implications for researchers, policymakers, and advocacy groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaker, J., & Smith, A. (2010). The dragonfly effect: Quick, effective, and powerful ways to use social media to drive social change. Jossey-Bass.

Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center.

Banaji, S., & Buckingham, D. (2013). The civic web: Young people, the Internet, and civic participation. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8949.001.0001

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.

Choi, S. M., & Lee, W. N. (2018). The role of social media in political participation: An empirical study in the context of South Korea. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(3), 455-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1451861

Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i2.3336

Gladwell, M. (2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker.

Howard, P. N., & Parks, M. R. (2012). Social media and political change: Capacity, constraint, and consequence. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 359-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01626.x

Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. NYU Press.

Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs.

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001

Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28-41.

Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Dhanraj. G, J. S., & Dyaaneshwar S. (2025). SOCIAL MEDIA ACTIVISM BY MILLENNIALS SHAPING PUBLIC OPINION ON SOCIAL ISSUES. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 12((4SE), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.29121/ijetmr.v12.i(4SE).2025.1590