IMPACT OF GST ON UNORGANIZED BUSINESS SECTOR COMPLIANCE COSTS AND COPING STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i4.2024.6328Keywords:
Compliance, Costs, Strategies, GST, ImpactAbstract [English]
The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) as a transformational reform measure in the field of India’s indirect taxes in 2017 signifies a complete overhauling of the existing indirect tax system by way of moving towards harmonization of taxes and greater efficiency. The impact of the reform among firms has proved extremely contentious, with large, organized firms clearly benefiting, but there is an open debate as to its impact on informal firms. How GST affects millions of small businesses, India’s biggest work base, and a key albatross around the economy’s neck This study deals with the impact the goods and services tax (GST) has had on some 65-million-plus micro and small enterprises, which collectively provide the livelihood to more than 80% of the Indian workforce and account for nearly 50% of the output of the nation. Drawing from secondary sources and 40 semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu in a mixed-method approach, the paper explores two sides of the coin of compliance costs and survival strategies.
The results suggest that the costs of compliance, in terms of finances, administration, and attitudes, are relatively higher and have a regressive edge on 3–6 percent of turnover for the informal business sector. At the same time, the report also spotlights industry resiliency. Coproduction entrepreneurs use coping strategies such as collective resource pooling, (meta-)intermediaries, strategic non-registration, and selective digitalization. These adaptive mechanisms write down that GST has not killed off informality but transformed it, resulting in what academic analysts have termed “bounded formalization.”
The paper finds the possibility of GST as an instrument of progressive formalization, and the design structure of the current GST worsens inequalities in the business ecosystem. Policy re-engineering, through accommodating compliance architecture, simplified refund mechanisms, supported digitalization, and sustained capacity-building, is essential to ensure that GST promotes inclusive growth, not exclusion.
References
Bird, R., & Gendron, P. P. (2007). The VAT in developing and transitional countries. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619366
Chen, M. (2012). The informal economy: Definitions, theories and policies. WIEGO Working Paper No. 1.
Government of India. (2017). The Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016. Ministry of Law and Justice.
Government of India. (2018). Annual report 2017–18. Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue.
Keen, M. (2013). The anatomy of the VAT. National Tax Journal, 66(2), 423–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2013.2.06
Mukherjee, S. (2020). Impact of GST on small enterprises in India: Evidence from sectoral analysis. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(35), 47–54.
NITI Aayog. (2018). Transforming the informal sector in India. New Delhi: NITI Aayog.
Purohit, M. C. (2019). Goods and Services Tax in India: Evolution, impact and challenges. Journal of Public Finance and Policy, 2(1), 1–18.
Rao, M. G. (2019). GST in India: Achievements, challenges and prospects. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy Working Paper.
Reserve Bank of India. (2019). Report on currency and finance: GST and the Indian economy. Mumbai: RBI.
Sharma, A. (2019). Compliance costs under GST: A study of small traders in North India. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 65(3), 505–520.
Singh, R. (2021). GST and the informal sector: Emerging patterns and challenges. Indian Economic Journal, 69(2), 159–176.
World Bank. (2018). India development update: India’s growth story and GST reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dhananjay Kumar Singh, Binod Pratap Singh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.