ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing ArtsISSN (Online): 2582-7472
A BRIEF STUDY OF
AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL ART PRACTICES IN CONTEMPORARY INDIAN PAINTINGS 1 Research Scholar, Department of Painting, Faculty of Visual Arts, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
1. INTRODUCTION Everything that we see around us is art. The point is that
how we look at anything, only our psyche can corroborate this. There is no
instrument or any theory to measure art; each attitude can decide whether this
is art or not. As we all were very different from each other, everyone’s
emotions, likes and dislikes were all distinct, which would make art’s division
according to how everyone’s imagination of art would different. Art enriches
our life and our life will continue even if it is not
there. But imagine a world without culture, art, music, movies, books, or
poetry. It would be a terribly lifeless place. Art is a way through which we
can express all kinds of feelings without any hesitation. Based on all the
events happening in the society with which we feel connected and conscious and
aware of, and based on emotions like happiness, sadness, memories, personality,
defeat-victory, fear, nervousness and every feeling inside us that we can’t easily write or tell anyone, can
create it directly or indirectly through art. Art gives artist the courage to
bring their voice to society as a whole. It gives a chance to understand,
become a medium to deal with many difficulties. In this sense, art is a sort of
soft power and its value is incalculable since it has
a subtle impact on the world rather than a macro one. “Communication is facilitated by art, particularly when it
uses images. It enables people to build a sense of community and solidarity
that transcends geographical boundaries. It is the obligation of artists to
elicit responses from viewers on an emotional and physical level in addition to
intellectually introducing them to new ideas. Through these channels, art
combats the deluge of information and encourages people to take
action. Engaging with art is not a solitary activity; it provides a
venue for people to share an experience in our culture, where such
opportunities are rare, even if they have different opinions. The crucial
aspect is not our consensus on the shared experience, but rather the
recognition of the value in sharing an experience in itself.
Within art and various cultural forms of expression, discord is welcomed and
embraced as a necessary component. In this context, the community fostered by
arts and culture has the potential to transcend the divisive populism and
stigmatization prevalent in public conversations, as activists strive to do.
Art also urges us to appreciate instinct, doubt, and innovation, and to
perpetually explore novel concepts. Artists aspire to defy conventions and
discover unconventional approaches to contemporary matters.” Olafur (2016) If we talk about writing, we seen, the functionality of
language and art are of the same kind, but language has its own constraint
because there is a breakdown in language and communication, everyone’s has disparate language that cannot
be understood. Thats why visual is a wider way, to reach the society than the
language. As language has to be learned but visuals
not. Our relationship with visuals is centuries old and therefore
understandable. It is already embedded in our conscience. Like, when we seeing a sharp
object, we would understand that it is a stinging, hurting thing. We will
understand the functions of a nail or a spear only through visualization,
whether we have a common language or not. When we talk about contemporary art, we mean art that was
created in the 20th or 21st centuries. Modern artists use technology that is
globally impacted, culturally diverse, and multifaceted to change the world.
Their art is a dynamic fusion of materials, techniques, ideas, and themes that
beckons to question easy description and engage tradition in a boundary line.
The period after 1950s to now is called contemporary era. Artworks created in
this period are difficult to comprehend. Contemporary art movements like body
art, conceptual art, performance art, visual storytelling through paintings,
land art, super-realistic painting, etc. were all prevalent during this time period. As we have learned the effect of global art on society,
which may be realistic art, conceptual art, minimalist art, etc, on this basis,
here we discuss about the, ‘A Brief study of
Autobiographical Art Practices in Contemporary Indian Paintings’. Autobiographical
Art Practices is the art, in which the artist himself/herself works based
on their notion formed out
of expressing emotions that is an outcome of their lived experience.
The word “autobiography” is
a combination of the Greek words “auto” for self,
“bio” for life, and, “graph” for writing. Autobiography
(n.d.) The first person ‘I’
is the most tangled indicator of autobiographical artwork, in which the artist,
the protagonist and the narrator are all the same. The previous literature has proposed various criteria to
define about several Art Practices. Different approaches stand out, major part
of the previous literature have used to define the story behind their art
narration in various context or say that in a holistic context. None of these
approaches are able to properly define the
Contemporary Autobiographical art practices in Indian context. In ‘Modern Art
in India’, Ajit Mookerjee assert the concept of
individuality, he stated a period of the signed picture, which meant a
transition from collective to individual effort. “An autobiography is a distinctive and captivating
document that possesses enduring historical value as a firsthand account, while
also presenting a distinct sense of self. Autobiographical works inherently
carry a subjective nature. Nevertheless, the author's subjectivity is
inseparable from the power of their personality within an autobiography. It
offers a fresh perspective and deep understanding of how individuals shape
their own identities and interpret their experiences. Memory, identity, and
experience serve as the foundation for rationality within autobiographical
subjectivity. The creator of an autobiography gathers the fragmented elements
of their individual self and reconstructs them into a cohesive portrayal. The
artist exists as both their self and something greater, simultaneously
inhabiting and transcending social and historical contexts.” Jayaannapurna (2017) People tend to avoid recalling particular
remembered and recognizable moments as chronological time passes and
instead describe their life events in more broad and condensed terminology. Likewise,
in the absence of any suggestion to the sensory and emotional aspect of a
specific memory, individuals have the ability to analyze and present raw information, statistics, and
explanations that define certain individuals, occurrences, or historical
epochs. In autobiographical work of the artist, self refers,
to their perspective of feelings in which he/she describes their detailed
perception including sense of their conscience which sometimes can’t be express. The importance of
autobiographical art is to calm the curiosity of knowing all these mysteries. The autobiographer frequently
replicates particular events in their life, such as the people who shaped them
or the causes they were most passionate about. A
person's mirror of himself while going through specific exceptional and
unmatched personal backdrops is a phenomenal episode. Based on these
components, each person's likes, dislikes, ideas, and behaviors
collectively make up their unique identity. Jayaannapurna (2017) It has been viewed as a means of self-transcendence,
self-expression, self-understanding, and self-construction. While confessions,
journals, memoirs, reflections, and self-portraits are frequently recognized as
diverse forms of autobiography, it is obviously difficult to determine the
boundaries of the genre. Autobiography poses a number of
intriguing issues regarding memory. Values are commonly seen as being essential
to the formation of personality, societal morality, and the basis for leading
an autobiographical artistic life. This kind of work can be done to fulfill some needs, like to express their freedom to live,
to maintain their self-respect, earning social recognition, contributing
towards national security, and for catharsis purpose (as a way of getting rid
of anger, reducing suffering, etc). “Sometimes Reality is Too Complex. Stories Give it
Form.” (Jean-Luc-Godard) The concept of individuality is discussed in
autobiographies; it "includes our views about our physical
characteristics, personality traits, values, abilities, roles and goals, as
well as the acquisition that we exist as individuals.” The Cognitive Self (n.d.)Individualism is
defined as a preference for self-expression and exploration above tradition or
popular mass idea and behaviors. It is the ability
for artists to accomplish anything they wish as self-employed individuals.
Individuality, as opposed to individualism, "evokes the notion of one’s
own identity established both through introspective re-examination of the
givens of life and through the ongoing integration of multiple traditions and
influences into a cohesive whole". Hinchman
(1990) Autobiography can help a person better understand
themselves, other people, and the world at large. By comprehending an alternate
existence within a distinct temporal and spatial context, it heightens our
consciousness regarding the essence of our individual identities and our part
in the complexities of the human condition. We can see and touch metaphors even when we cannot see or
touch the self, which serve as a bridge between the internal and exterior, the
experience of the artist and that of the audience, the past and the present
selves, and the formed and unformed selves. An autobiography is a monument to
the self as it is becoming as well as a chronicle of the past or a book/work of
art that is currently in circulation. We read autobiographies to learn more
about ourselves and the present, not about other people or the past. The most
recognizable form of symbolic memory is autobiography. Satchidanandan (2001) Autobiographical art has the power to help people understand the purpose of life and find answers to its difficulties, as well as to win acceptance and admiration. Life-writing in the Indian subcontinent is moving in a new direction when people who are socially and economically disadvantaged, marginalized, and represent the everyday aspects of life, known as "vulnerable subjects," use it as a potent tool to reclaim their identity and express their unique perspectives through a critical examination of prevailing societal norms. We contend that the move from religious subjects to
secular ones, from the lives of extraordinary persons to those of ordinary
people, and from a predominately male-dominated field to a practice embraced by
women, marks the evolution of autobiography. Additionally, autobiography has
transformed from a narrow genre into one that is more inclusive, moving beyond
its origins in the West to become a well-liked topic in the postcolonial era.
Autobiography's chronological scope has also undergone considerable changes. Sadhu (2021) The researcher has used the Descriptive, Analytical,
Historical and Correlational methodology and Psychoanalysis method theory. The
main purpose of psychoanalysis here is therefore to study underlying
unconscious motive of the artist and out what it is that compels the artists to
express himself in this manner. Quantitative and Qualitative, both the data collection
method is appropriate for this research as it deals with feelings, attitudes, opinions and thoughts of human beings. Data types would be collected by both types. It would be Primary and Secondary. Such as Interviews, Observation, Case Study, Questionnaire, Articles and Books related to the topic, Comments and Theories of Art Critics/ Historians/Philosophers on artist’s work, life history, visiting of Modern Art Galleries, Museums etc. 1.1.
HISTORY OF AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL ART The beginning of the autobiography can be reckoned with
literature. In the form of self-story, it came first in writing, then by
writing, it became ingrained in the visual arts. Whereby the artist was able to
portray a description of his/her life, through visuals. “Historians of Greed philosophy assert that Heraclitus was the pioneering advocating that all cosmology originates from self-awareness. He was the foremost to develop a physiology and a physics that projected a cosmology intentionally mirroring is own self, as the exceptional focal point.” Though, they frequently disagreed in their that consciously reflected himself, the unique man at its centre.” Though, they frequently disagreed in their interpretations of transcendence as well as the relationship between the self and the other, the world, and the Cosmic Self, the Upanishads, Buddhism, Tamil Shaivism, Bhakti and Sufi poetry, Ramayana, Vivekananda, Sri Aurobindo, and Mahatma Gandhi all made reference to the idea of self-knowledge (atma-jnana), which is a central concept in Indian metaphysics.Saint Augustine’s Confession was written in around 400 AD and served as a model for Christian authors throughout the Middle Ages. Along with this, the threat of several autobiographies persisted. The sculptor and goldsmith Benvenuto Cellini's (1506–1571) autobiography, which he wrote between 1556 and 1558 and gave the simple title Vitam, is comparable to one of the first major autobiographies of the Renaissance (which began following the end of the Middle Ages in the 14th century) (Italian:Life). Self-concept. (2005) Figure 1
Further, if we focus on the Indian context, Autobiography
seems to have blossomed properly only by the middle of nineteenth century.
Though, there are older instances as well, such as Banarasi
Das' Ardha Katha (1641), a Hindi poem in which the
Jaina poet of Mughal India portrays his transformation from a rebellious
teenager to a religious realization by the time the work was written. Satchidanandan (2001) Now, we look at the autobiography in the context of art.
It can only emerge when an artist could be free to express, it means art
without patronage. We can trace the autobiographical art practice in
Prehistoric era Figure 1. They used to create
their story on the walls of cave, specially we take example of ‘Hand prints’ image in which they were consciously or unconsciously marks
their presence in history, to identify their dwelling place. Means personal
identity was somewhere in them which can be seen in handprint work. After this, Ghiberti of the Renaissance, the first artist
autobiography, discusses the history of art in Italy, his personal life as it
relates to his works, and his idea of art. There are two extremes of
autobiography in Cellini and Cardano: Cellini presents himself, and Cardano
analyses himself. The pietistic is autobiographers
to the slightest shades of religious feeling, illustrate a trend to give a new
importance to the details of personal life, and there is evidence of the same
trend in the secular autobiography. Roy (1960) If we are discussing
about identity, accordingly we have to know, since
when did such awakening took place. When the emergence of awareness pertaining
to their individuality and establishing her/himself in art started to get
importance. So under this, we will link the
autobiography (which identifies the personality of a specific person), with the
signature in a work of art. The signature is the essence under which the artist
marks himself/herself in history, and records their presence, in addition to
the artwork as a personal identity, which originate in India from Molaram’s signature, with his death in1833 B.C.E. began the
period of the signed picture which meant a transition from collective to
individual effort. Mookerjee
(1956). The Mughal kings also
wanted the painting signed in order to identify the
artist’s name to reward them. From all these documents, we can find out the
personal touches of the artists had started coming into the artworks. After
this, if seen, every artist started working in their individual style from the
colonial period and gradually when the patronage of colonial ended it became a
general practice. Subjectivity in Indian art by Indian artists has been present since ancient times. Indian art has always been a reflection of the culture and values of the society in which it was created. Indian artists have used their art to express their personal experiences, beliefs, and emotions. This subjectivity can be seen in the various forms of Indian art, such as painting, sculpture, and architecture. In modern times, Indian artists have continued to explore their subjectivity through their art, often using it to explore themes of identity, politics, and social issues. In India, the history of autobiographical art begins with the turn of the 20th century, when artists began to explore their own personal experiences and identities through their work. This trend was largely driven by Bengal school after the colonial period, individuality among artists reflected their inner self, not only composition-wise but also subject-wise, to which names of Amrita Sher-Gil and Rabindranath Tagore can be added Figure 2. Later on, after the independence different groups of artists came out, presented art in their style. The rise of modernism, when “The best artists began their search of true art once more, understanding the essential ideas that underlie all great masterpieces rather than merely copying the surface of the past.” ended the crisis that Indian art had experienced during colonial rule, according to German historian Herman Goetz. Mitter (2001) As Amrita Sher-Gil is positioned for the subjectivity at the beginning of Indian modernism. She first emerged on the Indian screen in the middle of the 19th century, at a time when a group of notable artists (Nandlal Bose, Rabindranath Tagore, Ramkinkar Baij and Benode Bihari Mukherji) were making some fundamental decision about sovereignty in contemporary Indian culture. The artist in Santiniketan were promoting the virtues of cultural pedagogy and inspired vocation. In Calcutta, Yamini Roy was pursuing the market place. Raja Ravi Varma worked to build a professional exhibition circuit on an Indian basis around the turn of the century, and Amrita Sher-Gil followed in his footsteps by taking the first steps in that direction. She argued that her style choices needed to reflect the solution to the identity problem. She expressed the right of women to deal with a sexually immanent self through both her character and her art. Her special responsibility is to bring to bear. The aesthetic issues of Amrita Sher-Gil brought up at this point in the complex are very interesting. She established the foundational concepts for an existentially defined progressivism in her personal quest an aesthetic calibrated to register the European and Indian characteristics. The aesthetic issues of Amrita Sher-Gil brought up at this point in the complex are very interesting. She established the foundational concepts for an existentially defined progressivism in her personal quest an aesthetic callibrated to register the European and Indian characteristics. This was given special consideration in the years after her passing by the progressive artist collective founded in Bombay in 1947. Although Shergill's progressivism reflected the circumstances of her birth, by the time it emerged in the 1930s, the notions of (nationalist) sovereignty had inexorably been incorporated. Her life became a cultural exchange where she showed a fight for independence as part of a clash of civilizations. All civilizations fighting against colonialism displayed this identity-confusion. In the postcolonial battles that followed, an alternate form of cultural modernity emerged. Figure 2
After independence PAG (Progressive Artist Group), forged
a brave new world. With the rejection of academic art, in their firm belief in
the autonomy of painterly image, in their quest for self-expression, the Group
could be considered the first self-conscious modernists in the country, artists
like FN Souza, Figure 3, MF Hussain, SH Raza,
SK Bakre etc. Dalmia and Hashmi (2007) Expressionism finding the most direct means for the depiction of personal feelings and archetypal contents. By the 1980s, several artists had intervened in and transformed, for their specific purposes, the practice of equating objectivity with specific means of working, of finding subject matter in the immediate environment rather than in ‘grand’ themes. Figure 3
Significant developments have occurred in the art since
then, particularly with regard to the arrival at
radical subjectivity positions. In 1981, Bhupen Khakhar figuratively inscribed
in an unprecedented manner the statement about the self with the painting
titled ‘You can't please All' Figure 4. By itself it would
not have had much consequence, but he deliberately arrived at an upfronted problematization
with the painting titled ‘Two Men in Benaras’ Figure 4. The painting is rife
with challenges directed towards the conventional societal norms of mortality.
The theme itself is an unusual option in representation, particularly when seen
within the Indian context of elite, and middle class
consciousness. For that matter all of Bhupen's work has consistently challenged
and embarrassed elitist pseudo-modesty, condescension
and sense of decor. Bhupen in certain cases does bring into his art the
minority gay community, in the sense of getting their subaltern/colonized
status represented. This subversion of the autobiographical enables reaching out towards an affiliational social space. At the same time these do not address the 'problem' of the social identity of gays and the issues related to this. In certain cases the subject revolves around ordinary workers-paanwalas, fisher folk, etc. The autobiographical further leads on towards defining the psychological quintessence of experience, celebrative and angst-ridden at the same instance. In the early examples communion and inter subjectivity itself remain distanced, and whenever figures do come together in an alliance, the experience of the enigmatic and the bizarre takes over. Floating in innumerable combinations of communion, fantasizing and imagining, the subject confronts alienation and the fear of self-effacement which is brought in as an aspect of figuration itself. After all, apart from the option for an alternate lifestyle, the subject has to also deal with the deterministic issues of commodification and fetishization which go against positive life instincts. Figure 4
Rekha Rodwittiya’s paintings assert the right of the subject to be sensuous and vulnerable. The physicality, nudity and sexuality are treated self- consciously and precariously, since the uncertain aspects of sensuality itself could turn out to become an issue. Artist like Zarina Hashmi who deals with her autobiography of homelessness, in her work ‘Travels with Rani I and II’ Figure 5. Jehangir Jani and Balbir Krishna discourses around the phenomenology of gay experiences. Panikkar et al. (1997) Figure 5
1.1.1.
CONCLUSION It can be assumed that the beginning of Identity is mainly
done by women painters in India because women in India have always been mostly
counted among a suppressed population.
Whose desires, choices, personality, existence are suppressed, so in
this form, a female artist Amrita Sher-Gil in India has solved the problem of
identity through her art. She
articulates the privilege of woman equally through her personality through her
art. Every artist has expressed themselves in a distinctive way at a particular
moment, bringing to light a secret inner dimension and realizing it via their
works of art. These artists have served as social capital, identifying members
of the community by shared knowledge or access to their works of art. In India,
autobiographical art is frequently utilized to foster communication and
understanding.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS None. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS None. REFERENCES Autobiography (n.d.). What is Autobiography? Definition, Usage and Literary Examples. Supersummary. Dalmia, Y., and Hashmi, S. (2007). Contemporary Art of India and Pakistan. Oxford University Press Hinchman, L. P. (1990). The Idea of Individuality: Origins, Meaning, and Political Significance. The Journal of Politics, 52(3), 759-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131826 Jayaannapurna, A.V.S. (2017). A Study
of Autobiographical Approach
and Understanding. Scholedge
International Journal of Multidisciplinary & Allied Studies, 4(4), 28-30. Jayaannapurna, A.V.S. (2017). A Study
of Autobiographical Approach
and Understanding. Scholedge
International Journal of Multidisciplinary & Allied Studies, 4(4), 28-30. Mitter, P. (2001). Indian Art. Oxford University Press Mookerjee, A. (1956). Modern Art in India. Oxford Book & Stationary Co. Olafur, E. (2016, January 18). Why Art has the Power to Change the World.
World Economics Forum. Panikkar, K., Shivaji, N., Preetha, G., Das, A. (1997). Art, Subjectivity and Ideology: Colonial and Post Independent India. Nandan an Annual on Art And Aesthetics, 17, 1-94. Roy, P. (1960). Design And Truth in Autobiography. Sadhu, S. (2021). Resistance to Autobiography : The Indian Experiment with Life-Writing. Rupkatha Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 13(3), 1-12. Satchidanandan, K. (2001). Reflections : Thinking of Autobiography. Indian Literature, 45(2), 5-12. Satchidanandan, K.
(2001). Reflections : Thinking of Autobiography. Indian Literature, 45(2), 5-12. Self-concept. (2005, April 10). In Wikipedia. The Cognitive Self (n.d.): The Self-Concept.
© ShodhKosh 2023. All Rights Reserved. |